Gays bringing e-harmony to its knees

[logic1]

Picking and choosing who you sell products to based around your own personal beliefs sounds like the opposite of capitalism and a free society.

Actually the picking and choosing is the purest form of capitalism and a free society. Nobody said life is fair.

 

[speakeasy]

Hey, whatever God in whatever book that made Adam and Eve is the same God that made Adam and Steve.

Unless you woke up one day and made a conscious decision to be attracted to girls, how can you say that gays made a conscious decision to be attracted to guys? Your sexuality isn't a choice. If it were, most of these gay dudes probably would have chose to be normal and not be ostracized by society, right?

I always ask people in these discussions: Were you 50/50 on which sex you were attracted to? No? You've always liked women? So what makes you think they choose to like men. If anything, it's a genetic abnormality. But it's not a choice.

Then what explains why there's so much butt sex in prison? I've seen prison documentaries where men turned gay after being in prison and said they'd never even thought about sleeping with a man before going in.

Secondly, sure homosexuals may have no choice in their attraction, but that doesn't mean they were born that way either. Some people may have had something happen at a very young age that changed their thinking. Like a young girl who gets molested by her uncle then grows up with social phobias due to events in her early childhood.

Personally, I believe it's a 50/50 thing. They've done studies on identical twins that show that if one twin is gay, there's a 50% chance the other will be. Now if homosexuality were 100% genetic, then both identical twins would gay since they share the same exact DNA. On the other hand, genes must play a role otherwise, it wouldn't be the case half the time. It's a combination of both. Homosexuality is probably not an on/off switch, but more of a sliding scale where your environment plays a role. For some the gay genes may be so strong, that for them it's not a choice. I've seen some guys who act kinda gay and effeminate, yet go for women. These guys could probably go for men if that was all there was, but since they've been socialized to go for women, that's what they do. Bisexuals I think fall somewhere in between.

Anyway, I don't think it's simple "you're born gay" thing that gays try to make it out to be. Because sometimes the most macho tough guys ex-cons you've seen had no problem getting it up to fvck a man in the ass in jail. Then they come out and go back to banging women.

 

[SexxiKing777]

It's not so much a "gay political movement" that worries me. It's the notion that businesses (businesses...NOT churches) would be allowed to refuse service to people based on personal beliefs. That frightens me...because once it's okay to discriminate gays, who's next? Jews? Asians? Italians? I just don't want it to be me, man. I don't want to go to a chinese food place and hear, "Hey, we don't serve Italians. Get out." And by your rules, that would be okay. Because it seems you're saying that the government should let businesses deny service to people based on their racial, sexual, or religious beliefs.



Eh. I don't think you should have to hide who you are. Especially when you were born that way. Me and you...we grew up liking women, right? There was no decision...we didn't say "Hey, guys are kinda cute...but girls are cuter." We said "I like girls. This is what works for me." Gays were born liking men. They didn't choose it. So why should they hide it? Why should they be denied rights because they were born a certain way?

Eharmony is not denying these fools rights. They only catered to straight couples because it was a straight site. I don't see why they couldn't simply go to a site just for gay people if they want gay dating. I would not b1tch and moan because some gay site doesn't cater to my needs, there are plenty of other ways to meet women anyway.

No rights were lost unless eharmony became the authority of dating and said gays could not date PERIOD. THEN it would be an issue of rights. But until then, Gays have all the right to date,fvck, and live the way they want to. Now is everyone going to agree with it? No, but fvck those people, let them be and mind your own damn business. Even Jesus himself said to leave people the fvck alone if they won't listen. One should not be forced to agree with something they don't like. This country is going in reverse. soon we will be just like the communist where you have to support sh1t or die. It's crazy.

eharmony never said you HAD to be straight. They just didn't have a gay option.

Should I sue the women's club down the street for not catering to men?

Should I sue Lifetime because they don't have "male" programs?

Should I sue the Karate school because They don't teach Kung fu?

when does this madness end?

 

[Iceberg]

Then what explains why there's so much butt sex in prison? I've seen prison documentaries where men turned gay after being in prison and said they'd never even thought about sleeping with a man before going in.

Whoaaa....That's a WHOLE different scenario. I'm talking about people in normal walks of life...not people who are condemned to be locked in a building with nothing but men for the rest of their lives.

That's like if I said, "People aren't born cannibals." And you'd say "No way. What about those guys that were stuck on a mountain with nothing to eat but people."

You get what I'm saying? You don't wanna take extreme cases of people in unusual situations and use it as part of a hypothesis.

Secondly, sure homosexuals may have no choice in their attraction, but that doesn't mean they were born that way either. Some people may have had something happen at a very young age that changed their thinking. Like a young girl who gets molested by her uncle then grows up with social phobias due to events in her early childhood.

Some gays experienced that. You are correct. But would you wager that a MAJORITY of them suffered molestation or some similar traumatic event?

Personally, I believe it's a 50/50 thing. They've done studies on identical twins that show that if one twin is gay, there's a 50% chance the other will be. Now if homosexuality were 100% genetic, then both identical twins would gay since they share the same exact DNA.

There have been identical twins born where one has a personality disorder and the other is "normal". It's not like "gay" is swimming around in the mothers womb guaranteed to effect both twins. Issues involving the mind are different than issues involving the body. Do you disagree?

For instance, twins, while sharing genetics, do not necessarily share the same turn-ons and turn-offs in regards to the opposite sex. They have different minds and are attracted to different things.

I think my use of the word "genetic" threw you off. I don't mean, you can pass a gay gene to kids. I just mean that "you're born that way"...which is an incorrect usage o the word. My bad.

Anyway, I don't think it's simple "you're born gay" thing that gays try to make it out to be. Because sometimes the most macho tough guys ex-cons you've seen had no problem getting it up to fvck a man in the ass in jail. Then they come out and go back to banging women.

Macho tough guys in jail are banging weak little inmates because they have no other option. Those guys aren't "gay" so much as they're just out of other choices. People gotta bang somethin, right? I'm talking about gays that lived normal lives, and had every opportunity to settle down and be "normal" but couldn't do it because they were attracted to dudes. I think we'll agree that this is the logical majority of them, right?

Do you think those people should be forced to a life of different rules than the rest of us because of something they had no choice over?

Anyway, I don't think it's simple "you're born gay" thing that gays try to make it out to be.

Simple question then. Were you born straight?

By the way: I know the discussion isn't going to go anywhere. People aren't gonna change their beliefs just because of a talk on the internet. So, hey whatever, man. I respect your opinion. I'm not gonna make you go back-and-forth with this thing all day

 

[speakeasy]

Simple question then. Were you born straight?

I don't know. I really don't. I've always been straight and that's what feels natural to me. But who's to say I wouldn't be gay or bi if someone raised me thinking it wrong to be with girls. Homosexuality was rampant in ancient Greece because the culture held up young teenage boys as the ideal sexual objects and women were viewed as being for procreation only.

 

[Ken785]

This is ridiculous. God, im glad i votes YES on Prop 8!!

 

[backbreaker]

1. there actually isn't that much butt sex in prison. vastly overhyped media thing. it does go on ovbiously but not as much as you would think. it's not like they hand you your jump suit and a sack of trojans when you get there.

it happens, but it is usually in retalation for something or to get back at someone for something.

2. If you own a company that is half ass successful you will be sued. it's not a amtter of if it's a matter of how often.

90% of all lawsuits are stupid and it's what's wrong with america. America is sue happy

 

[speakeasy]

1. there actually isn't that much butt sex in prison. vastly overhyped media thing. it does go on ovbiously but not as much as you would think. it's not like they hand you your jump suit and a sack of trojans when you get there.

I wouldn't say it's overhyped at all. More men get raped than women. Read the second paragraph:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prison_rape

 

[Alle_Gory]

This is not a move by the gay community. This is a frivolous lawsuit so a couple of douchebags (who happen to be gay) can fill their pockets with some coin.

This is on the level of the dude in a wheelchair going around suing businesses that aren't wheelchair accessible for a living and the woman who sued McDonalds because their hot coffee was hot and she burned herself when she spilled it.

Simply greedy bastards thriving in a sue happy culture.

 

[speakeasy]

Now look:

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2010/01/28/exclusive-cbs-limbo-air-gay-dating-site-ad-super-bowl/?test=faces

I'm convinced that there are some brilliant social engineers in the background behind all this stuff pushing the limits and seeing how far they can go. I think the flamboyant parading of gays in the mass media over the last 10 years(Brokeback Mtn, Queer Eye, Queer as folk, Perez Hilton, MTV gay shows, etc etc) is to try and force people to get comfortable with homosexuality with the goal of making legal gay marriage national law.

Think about it, gays are only 1 or 2% of society. So running a massively expensive superbowl ad for such a tiny demographic doesn't even make fiscal sense. Then factor in that even of the couple percent, only a part of them are going to be watching the superbowl, and then only a part of them are going to want to sign up for a dating site in the first place, so you're talking about a fraction of 1% of the country. So what is the real reason behind this ad? I think it's a way of saying "screw you" to people who view heterosexuality as the norm.

 

[Rescue Mission]

3 quick hitting points:

1) gay people need to shut up and mind their own business; I am straight, and I mind my own business without trying to heavily push the straight agenda on the whole world.

2) no real player/don juan would ever be found on eharmony in the first place, because that site costs $$ and is wayyyyy detailed (thus meeting women's needs for a forced relationship instead of a man's need of having fun/sex).........a don juan gets women for free, bottom line

3) since when is the demise of the continuation of our society celebrated? Gay people will not reproduce, thus killing off our population slowly but surely (especially as the gay population keeps rising).......all in the meantime, Muslims are having 4-5 kids per STRAIGHT couple, and increasing their population exponentially...........how many accepted gay muslims do you know by the way?

 

[OzyBoy]

I just saw an ad on tv as i am reading this. Quite funny. No gay people though. :moon: