Gangbang teacher says "she's the victim"

[betheman]

You are talking about the hypocrisy of the court system now, which is another subject altogether, that is not what your first post was about!

Your first post was about the teacher and how you thought she should feel guilt or remorse etc. Which is bullshyt, as I pointed out. Now either admit that or prove it wrong, don't try to change the subject, grandpa...

of course she should feel guilt and remorse, she is a teacher, in a position of trust and authority, she has abused that role. the clue is in the fact she has committed a crime and been found guilty. no guilt or remorse!
nice mild ad hominem attack in there, hypocrite much?

 

[visions]

if the teacher was a man he would've got life in prison...
on another note it's ridiculous how shameful american society is about sex and nudity (as demonstrated by the constant sex "scandals" the media tries to shove down our throats). we don't have problems showing on tv someone's head get blown away by a shotgun, but god forbid a penis or tit is shown.

 

[Burroughs]

Seems every other week some birds getting sprung fvcking her students. I guess now that male teachers have gone the way of the dodo hypergamy still gotta hypergamy some way some how. All that testosterone and teen bravado would be sending these wall nearing b!tches hamsters into overdrive.

I lol'd at 20/20 turning this chicks hypergamous impulses into a "story". Even had the soft guitar playing throughout the background. You know your gender has hit the jackpot when instead of public shaming and nightly ass poundings from Bubba you get soft guitar and a reporters sympathetic ear.

Public schooling #winning.

Its happening all around yet the vast majority of men stay stuck on stupid and are unable to catch the clues

thats the funniest thing really

faggot men will argue in support of this teacher :crazy:

Danger good job as usual in setting the clowns straight.

 

[Fruitbat]

Its happening all around yet the vast majority of men stay stuck on stupid and are unable to catch the clues

thats the funniest thing really

faggot men will argue in support of this teacher :crazy:

Danger good job as usual in setting the clowns straight.

Are you missing the point that sex means different things to men and women? Sex is a victory for the man. An older man doing it with 4 students IS different, as those girls will end up confused in their tiny minds, whereas the guys will be literally high fiving each other.

The point stands, it is unprofessional and she should have the same punishment as a man doing the same, but you are a closet feminist if you see the value of sex, and a gangbang FFS, as being the same for either sex. She offered something to those boys. 4 girls GBing a male teacher is always going to be different, and I would suggest that if you view sexuality as being an equal act for men and women, regardless of context, you are really in fem zone......as are most phaggots

 

[Burroughs]

Fruitfag... adults are talking here...go take your toys and go play in the corner....k
:crackup: :crackup: :crackup:

 

[Die Hard]

Whether the high school boys who fvcked her enjoyed it or not isn't the point. The courts do not ask 12 year old girls when they've had sex with 25 year old men, if they enjoyed it. We have statutory rape laws for a reason, and it's meant to protect children and minors from being abused and taken advantage of by adults and people who are in a position of authority or trust.

"12 year old girls" and "25 year old men"? I thought this was about guys of 18 years and older, and a 28 year old chick... Why are you comparing apples and oranges?

Like I've said before, she should be punished for her behavior because if her behavior was accepted, it could lead to OTHER situations where teachers actually DO take advantage of their position of authority and trust (just to be clear, this was NOT the case with her). But the public shame and losing her job seem like more than sufficient punishment to me, I find 5 years in jail absolutely disproportionate. What's next? Chopping a guy's arm off for stealing a pack of bubblegum?!

If you really believe she deserves more than 5 years in jail for something like this, then your ideas about justice are really fvcked up, in my opinion.

 

[Die Hard]

Clearly fag-hard has gone full retard :crazy: :crackup:

Awww, did I hurt your ego, poor Burroughs? Don't worry, the sting will pass

 

[Die Hard]

the clue is in the fact she has committed a crime and been found guilty. no guilt or remorse!

Ah, so you believe the question whether someone has been found guilty of a crime, determines whether that person should feel guilt/remorse?

Suppose tomorrow some new law gets passes, that says it's forbidden to look at a girl's boobs in public. So you go to the beach and some girl walks by topless and you look at her boobs. Cops come pick you up and you get convicted, they have eyewitnesses to prove you looked at her boobs and you get fined 100 dollars.
Next day, some reporter interviews you on what happened and you tell him you don't feel guil or remorse about looking at her boobs.

OH!!! SHAME ON YOU!!! The law clearly forbids looking at boobs in public and you have been found guilty of this CRIME! But you don't even feel guilt or remorse about it?! YOU MUST BE A PSYCHOPATH!!!


Well, this is your line of thinking.... Which is plain out retarded, as anyone can see. The question is, are you really this retarded? Or are you simply a butthurt mysogynist whose brain stops functioning properly as soon as he observes a woman who claims she feels victimized? ("Oh, women always fvck men over and then claim THEY are the victim! So let's just turn this into idea into a prejudice and assume that ANYTIME a woman claims she feels victimized, it's an untrue claim and she is an evil creature out to destroy the souls of men!")

Like I said before, some people on here have developed unhealthy thinking patterns. Shame me all you want but this thread is a clear example of that.

 

[betheman]

Ah, so you believe the question whether someone has been found guilty of a crime, determines whether that person should feel guilt/remorse? wtf are you banging on about? where have I asserted that a person should or shouldnt feel guilt or remorse?

Suppose tomorrow some new law gets passes, that says it's forbidden to look at a girl's boobs in public. So you go to the beach and some girl walks by topless and you look at her boobs. Cops come pick you up and you get convicted, they have eyewitnesses to prove you looked at her boobs and you get fined 100 dollars.
Next day, some reporter interviews you on what happened and you tell him you don't feel guil or remorse about looking at her boobs.

OH!!! SHAME ON YOU!!! The law clearly forbids looking at boobs in public and you have been found guilty of this CRIME! But you don't even feel guilt or remorse about it?! YOU MUST BE A PSYCHOPATH!!!


Well, this is your line of thinking.... Which is plain out retarded, as anyone can see. The question is, are you really this retarded? Or are you simply a butthurt mysogynist whose brain stops functioning properly as soon as he observes a woman who claims she feels victimized? ("Oh, women always fvck men over and then claim THEY are the victim! So let's just turn this into idea into a prejudice and assume that ANYTIME a woman claims she feels victimized, it's an untrue claim and she is an evil creature out to destroy the souls of men!")

Like I said before, some people on here have developed unhealthy thinking patterns. Shame me all you want but this thread is a clear example of that.

I didnt even read the rest of it, you are trying and failing miserably, to be a smart arse. sounds like you are pi$$ed off at something in life and are using a forum to score imaginary points.

 

[Die Hard]

LOL, I'm just pointing out the flaws in your thinking. Don't be butthurt...

And to answer your question, you asserted that she should feel guilt and remorse in your second last post. Let me quote that for you:

of course she should feel guilt and remorse

So are you gonna edit that post and delete the quote now, in order to save face?

Pathetic...


EDIT: 10 post count reached...

any normal, mentally stable person would

Hah, you are totally ignorant about normal, mentally stable persons then... Furthermore, you are basically saying you are not a normal, mentally stable person YOURSELF. Coz if you were a 28 year old teacher and four of your students (all above 18 years old) would come to your house and let you gangbang them, you would not feel guilty over it. Unless you're a faggot?

But hey, I wish you the best of luck with your retarded viewpoints. By now, I have pointed out so many of them that you've lost all credibility. On top of that, you first said she should feel guilt and remorse, then you claimed you never did say that etc. So you've disqualified yourself from this discussion, bye bye!

 

[betheman]

LOL, I'm just pointing out the flaws in your thinking. Don't be butthurt...

And to answer your question, you asserted that she should feel guilt and remorse in your second last post. Let me quote that for you:



So are you gonna edit that post and delete the quote now, in order to save face?

Pathetic...

any normal, mentally stable person would, I think thats the bit that eludes you

 

[zekko]

Yes, she wanted to have sex with the dudes, but she didn't want the whole school to know about it. First of all, it's quite embarassing for a teacher when all of the school's students see a video of the teacher having sex (regardless with whom the teacher is having sex).
Secondly, when the videotape is shown to all the students, you can bet your ass that it will end up with the school's administration, resulting in the teacher losing the job, or even worse, get jailed.

So obviously the dudes really fvcked her over by showing the videotape around, this is clear to see for anyone with half a braincell. I'm pretty sure any of you would feel victimized after being publicly embarassed, losing your job and getting jailed for 5 years!! Her whole life was basically destroyed and still people think she has no right to feel victimized???

Here's the problem: She had sex with four high school kids and then expected them to keep it quiet? Would you trust a bunch of teenagers with your future? Seriously, she should have known better, and has no one to blame but herself.

 

[Burroughs]

fag-hard's dog pissed on the bed so he's taking it out on SS :crackup:

 

[disgustipated]

It's statuatory rape if.the guys were 18 and she is however old she is?

 

[Lexington]

You can't really feel too sorry for this woman. Yes, she did something that her students enjoyed but she was incredibly stupid for doing it. She knew what the possible consequences were. Did she honestly think it was a good idea to allow high school students to film her getting gangbanged?

If I was a high school teacher and I fvcked 5 female students, they'd probably lock me up and throw away the key if word got out about it. This broad took a huge gamble and she lost. That's really all there is to it.

 

[Married Buried]

I know we like to make excuses for women like "hypergamy" or whatever but I've never met a slvt that wasn't crazy. Chilling.

The funniest part is they all like to hide the fact they are crazy sluts, but if you just know how to talk to them and listen, they will freely admit it.

 

[plate's_empty]

See this is your problem. You have your facts wrong: the boys in this case were all grade 12 students, making them older than 16 but less than 18 years of age, which of course means all or at least most of them were minors - and this is the whole reason this woman was charged, arrested, and convicted in the first place.

Per the video, they were all 18 or 19.

 

[Burroughs]

Brad isn't it interesting how the beta faggots come out of the woodwork on a topic like this...

...These men are destined to be the slave class and by the sound of things they have already accepted their fate

 

[speed dawg]

* This is the reason she feels victimized! And she has every right to! If you're unable to act professional and meet the requirements of your job, then you should not be allowed to work that job anymore and not whine about it. But if you GET THROWN IN JAIL FOR 5 YEARS because of that, you have every right to feel victimized.

She says, VERY CLEARLY in the video, that she feels victimized because they recorded the event and showed the school. That's fine, whatever. She may feel victimized, but she also decided to fvck 4 guys she didn't (or shouldn't) have trusted. So it matters little.

Bottom line, who gives a fvck. She's being punished for the crime she committed, which, in Texas, was the fact that she had sex with students. Who cares how she feels about it?

 

[sodbuster]

The only thing she is a "victim" of is stupidity.... hers