Gaming with Herpes=Game Over? (request for mature perspectives and advice)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Boilermaker

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 3, 2010
Messages
1,332
Reaction score
76
Danger said:
I have stated before and will state again. I have no problem with another category. Pointing out to the Mods EXACTLY proves my point about your insults. It proves nothing about your point, as I have answered your questions (while purposefully avoiding your flame-bait).


And I pointed out to the mods that you were calling names, which you were. Don't start hiding now. You called an entire group of posters bitter. Not naming names does not change the fact that you consider each individual bitter.

And your question about "ever been wrong in your life" was inflammatory, which you also know as well.

So, instead of hiding behind words. Be honest and admit you were purposefully being inflammatory.



I admit when I am wrong, but I don't compromise principles.

And while I have sympathy for the tragedy of Newton, it changes nothing about the facts of guns. The hallmark of reason is that is does not get swayed by sporadic emotional events, no matter how tragic, reason must remain.


And of course I have been wrong. Enough times to learn that I now only argue a point when I know I am right. I won't let go when I am right, and I keep posting evidence to support my argument. Inevitably, people (like in your previous post) resort to flaming and insults, simply because they are unable to deal with the facts presented to them. The facts here of course, being that the "instigators" are always the first to enter the MRA threads and start throwing insults, whereas no MRA's ever enter a pickup thread to attack PUA.

In fact, now you even try to disparage me by saying I am "calling the teachers".
Well, I don't need the MODS in the room when I am debating with you. I am past that age. If you need them in the room, I'd question your agenda.

I am not being inflammatory. If you look at this post's history, it was you who came to the defense of the MRM , although nothing personal was directed at you. That's why I am asking you: You always give the impression that you are carrying some sort of truth flag, and you are correct 100/100 while others are utterly wrong. Believe it or not, and for god's sake please don't feel insulted, this hurts your MRM cause also because you happen to look extremely marginal and stiff when it comes to real issues. There will always be some sort of spread in people's opinions, and the way you are spearheading the movement in this forum, you are the only true member of your club. (Should I add a little note that these are my opinions and I didn't mean to be inflammatory?)

I made a point, Zekko agreed. And then you came along and blamed the "no MRM in the Mature Men Forum please" crowd, and here we are.

My point is this: If the mods are going to control every single snarky remark we will make, they will have no other job in this world, because this is a forum of MEN, and I won't tiptoe around anyone's feelings just because they feel insulted by every tongue-in-cheek remark I make. "Being insulted" is more often than not, perceived rather than directed. If calling a religious guy "dogmatic" is insulting him, we can never speak the truth.

Everybody has their own style, and even when I am outright called an "idiot" , I don't take that personally or summon someone here.

Now, is the point this:

MRM must be here, because it's integral to game and Seduction.

If yes, I'd like to hear the reasons. Otherwise, let's open up an MRM section. This is not the first time this idea came about, what is the problem with going forward with it?
 

Boilermaker

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 3, 2010
Messages
1,332
Reaction score
76
Danger said:
Again, pointing out to the mods how the flame wars start is bad?
I think Mods are old enough to read, so they can see exactly where the flaming starts, themselves, no? You don't need to be extra helpful to them in that sense.

But please feel free, quoting yourself you are "hiding behind mods" when it's not necessary at all.

Slickster made a statement, to which I then pointed out how the flaming starts, which nobody can deny because it is the absolute truth. THIS VERY THREAD WITH YOUR VERY POST PROVES EXACTLY MY POINT. This post of yours was an intentional flame on me. You know it, I know it, everybody else knows it
You pointed out how the flaming starts, but you are not the flame yourself when you take a perfectly clear question

"A separate forum?"

and answer it by

" But it's you guys who insult us, first"

and that's not a flame ... That's extremely relevant! And important to be said, right there...!

I am smiling, Danger.

:)

Just man up yourself and admit you initiated flaming.
I'll type it if that's really going to make a difference for you? ... But I thought
you knew it, I knew it, and everybody else knew it, so why do you want me to admit something so clearly obvious?

Your flawless logic aside, I did NOT start the flaming. You came here to the rescue of MRM. And you reply to every single post I make, so half of this irrelevance is your contribution. If you like to show "I" flame, perhaps you can try not answering for once.

And as I said before, I have no problem with a new category. My problem is with the likes of you and others entering MRA threads and starting flame wars. This thread and your post #41 being a great example, and this isn't even an MRA thread.
With the likes of me?

Care to elaborate on that one? Or should I call Colossus to the arbitration on what you really meant on that one...

The likes of me... I wonder what that means.

You are so consistent, and logically flawless, you blew me away, this is my last post on the subject.

But I am glad after all these posts, something productive has come out and we found a common ground, and I found out that

DANGER does NOT have a problem with a separate forum for MRM and he agrees to take MRM related stuff to that forum if one is OPENED.
 

Boilermaker

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 3, 2010
Messages
1,332
Reaction score
76
Yes, keep clipping my posts out of context and re-posting them more and more, in case someone misses the original posts I make.

I said, well, I don't need the MODS in the room when I am debating with you. I am past that age. If you need the mods in the room, I'd question your agenda.

Now you dropped hinting that, and you are clearly begging for arbitration, as if there's some sort of grand judge we are talking to.

Yes, I am past the age where I need someone to check what I say. I think I am being perfectly civil.

Your contextless, and tasteless copy/pasting required me to answer once more. Apologize to OP, and I am out.

(But not like Solomon, because these cheap tricks will not really make me go away)

See you in another thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top