This post is actually relevant to the OP of this thread and therefore I will respond to it. This is because the idea of using a prostitute/escort as a last resort if you can't get with a real girl is undermined if even a prostitute/escort would reject you (i.e. although that could be argued to be your money or your business rather than romantically or sexually and there is no true rejection unless it's sexual (free sexual) or romantic).
If you go on google, and do a search term "no black gents"... you don't have to write anything else (make sure safe-search is off), then you'll see a bunch of threads, posts, or whatever dealing with that issue, or if you go on any escort review board. If you go on backpage, set the settings for Toronto, and then look up escorts (i.e. it is still legal to advertise in Canada if it's the escort herself advertising on it)....then you'll see allot of ads that say "no black gents", or less frequently "no brown/Indians/". Of those where it is not stated, you are not sure if you'll feel "welcome" with a set-up like that if you are not white or asian. If you are white, it's very unlikely you will be turned down by an escort.
On this point, I don't think anyone can argue that there is a white privilege issue / discrimination on THAT issue.
I see a number of other posts. As far as I'm concerned, unless trainwreck pitches in, you are all on your own unless this thread switches to "other topics" area, some other poster wants to take that on. If anyone dares to call me anti-white on the matter of involuntary celibacy and access to "paid" sex, escorts, etc.... then I think I have the high ground here. Although, I don't envy that position since I'm not one to want to pay for sex and feel "grossed out" of that type of sex. Just look at other posters like the one recently banned "Richard the Frog" and you'll see that someone who bases their lifestyle out of paying for encounters with escorts, tends to lose the novelty of it quickly, and wonder why they can't get it for free.