That post modern art on that page already shows I'm in for a good time of biased fun. Let's see...?
Default Settings:
20 - 40
Sounds about right as the cut off age for women, but I suspect if the minimum went even lower, women would easily put it as low as 15.
Race:
Too few options. It's clear who they care about the most here.
Min Height:
Default: 6'

no comment
Min Income: 80K
I kept everything default simply to see what the result would be.
- any marital status
- any race
- at least 6' tall
- any weight
- earning at least $80,000 per year
Probability
According to statistical data, the probability a guy of the U.S. male population ages 20 to 40 meets your standards is
3.1%
Delusion score
3/5
Aspiring cat lady
Then I decided to start picking race.
White: The percentage falls. What?
According to statistical data, the probability a guy of the U.S. male population ages 20 to 40 meets your standards is
2.5%
that is 4.4% of all white men in that age range
Black: ouch.
According to statistical data, the probability a guy of the U.S. male population ages 20 to 40 meets your standards is
0.23%
that is 1.8% of all black men in that age range
Asian: I don't even have to post that one. The percentage was even lower. I can use this tool all day to check different configurations. But let me see if I can get something really high.
- any marital status
- any race
- at least 5' 3" tall
- any weight
- earning at least $25,000 per year
According to statistical data, the probability a guy of the U.S. male population ages 20 to 85 meets your standards is
68.6%
Obviously, when you include all ages, the stats go up, but what I found is that the moment I lowered it to 25K, the number went up hard. In summary, none of this really means anything, but I was simply curious of the extreme data points of the survey.