STR8UP said:
Well for one I don't have the 2-3 hours a day it would take to burn that many calories. That's insane!
The 1700 was based upon about 2500 maintenance with 45 minutes of cardio added in a few days a week.
I wouldn't eat that low if your calories are 2500. I start out 500 below and adjust from there. If you go too low, fat loss will cease eventually. This is why people give up on diets often when at first they're like "it's working!" Low calories for too long kills off your metabolism. You can check this. Seriously sleep with a thermometer and the moment you wake up take your temperature. You shouldn't be much below 98.7. The lower it is, the more you've killed your metabolism. You don't want your calories too low to offset this as much as possible.
I'm taking fat off right now at a clip of 1-2 lbs a week. I'm 210 right now. I started at 219 5 weeks ago. Definition is returning to arms and my weekly saturday caliper measurements are definitely showing the number creeping downwards. I haven't even started cardio yet. It's cold
I just lift and eat 2300-2400 calories a day. I was bulking before at about 3400-3700 for over a year... and i think my maintenance is 2700-2800. Mostly all i've done is cut back my carbs to only around workouts and occassionally every few days.
You really shouldn't diet for longer than 12-16 weeks because of that metabolism thing. Even if it's just a few week break of eating back at normal calories before trying to cut fat again.
And i'd *never* diet while not lifting. Give your body a reason to horde that muscle since it's using it.
If i were you i'd lift, bump up the calories to over 2000, and just go walking 3-6 times a week 30-45 min at a time and maybe one HIIT session. Depends on whether the fat is coming off how much to do. If you're not going to lift then i'd do more HIIT sessions since you don't have to worry about tanking your lifting sessions by too much high intensity cardio.
I've lost 30 lb chunks twice in my life. One when i knew about nothing about diet and i had a ton of cereal and went running nearly every day. And the other when i was lifting and was low carb. The low carb was easier. It was more of a timed carb diet where you could plan cheats easier (have pizza and such)...
STR8UP said:
Yea, google a calorie burning chart and you will see that even the most strenuous exercises will only burn 7-800 cals per hour. That means that if you are in your target heartrate zone where you will maximize fatloss, you are probably only burning a few hundred per hour, 500 max.
That "zone" stuff means little. If you were doing HIIT you'd burn more calories overall even though you'd burn more calories WHILE EXERCISING from a 40 min walk. The HIIT would boost the metabolism for hours afterwards and in the long run burn more calories.