Electoral College Racist!

zekko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
16,065
Reaction score
8,909
I said in a recent post that we should expect to hear a lot about how Hillary won the popular vote, so as to try to deny Trump the ability to claim a mandate. Well, it's started already. Tonight on CNN, I heard a woman talk about the electoral college being racist.

There are a few rationales for this:
The first argument is that in the more populated states, people get less electoral votes per person than they do in the less populated states. The reason some say it is racist is because the more heavily populated states have more urban areas, where there are more minorities. Meanwhile, the less populated states are more rural in nature, and thus are mostly white. Therefore, the argument states that this gives whites more voting power than minorities.

The other argument is that in the days of slavery, they allowed slaves to count as 3/5 of a person even though they could not vote. This allowed the southern states to claim higher populations and thus be allotted more electoral votes. Therefore, the argument states, the electoral college played a part in giving more voting power to pro-slavery states.
_____

The main argument in favor of the electoral college is that it prevents the big cities from dictating policy to the states where the population is more spread out. The electoral college also made tallying the election results easier in a time when it took much longer to add up each individual vote.

I've heard arguments for and against abolishing the electoral vote in this country ever since I was born. I don't really have a strong opinion either way. But I can't help but be amused by the typical leftist tactic of labeling it racist to try to stir up support for them. We also know that we wouldn't be hearing any of these arguments if Hillary had won the election.
 

backseatjuan

Banned
Joined
Nov 2, 2011
Messages
4,463
Reaction score
1,657
Age
43
Location
Россия
War between Russia and United States is not world war 3, it is an impossible scenario at least, because such a war would leave in ruins both countries. Neither country is going to provoke each other to such a doom. World war 3 could look like many small wars throughout the world, total of such wars could be much scarier than a full blown nuclear war. It could happen if western structure of power collapses. United States has olympic national debt number which has doubled during 8 years of Obama rule - economic default in your country could provoke world war 3. Scenario with default would also bring war home as it will spark throughout your country just like these protests.

Those minorities can sense the impending lessening of spending on them, be it obama care, social security, or other poor programs. Government can not create jobs, government can only ration wealth properly. That money is going to go elsewhere, for example on creating jobs, which is much more important. Other examples are your alaska oil pipeline, less military bases across the world (you have 650 bases throughout the world), better choices for military technology, and other things.

The term "racist" itself is liberal garbage, designed to cater the liberal garbage. They have to say something, let them say it, but it will not last more than several weeks.
 

logicallefty

Moderator
Joined
Apr 26, 2006
Messages
6,055
Reaction score
5,237
Age
50
Location
Northeast Florida, USA
I made a similar post about the Electoral College, yesterday I believe it was. Buy stock in Kleenex now folks because #cryinglikeamotherfvckingbabyoverhillaryloosing is about to take the nation by storm! I am not a big fan of the Electoral College, but it's law and fair play right now, and Trump won fair and square. Just like I am not a fan of the Executive Order powers either. But they are law and fair play and we all know Obama didn't hold back using them to give a big fat middle finger to Congress.
 

BetterCallSaul

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
863
Reaction score
378
Location
Texas
The electoral college isn't going anywhere and it should never elect a president by popular vote. This nation is not a direct democracy despite what is parroted by news anchor talking heads. If the president were decided by popular vote, we would only be socialists and/or the people easiest to buy off get into office. There would never be any sort of conservative voice in any elected office in Washington.

Learn how our system works before criticizing it.
 
Top