U
user43770
Guest
To be fair to Slickster, the original post was about picking up women in a flailing economy.( . )( . ) said:
Election implications
- Thread starter seasonedplayer
- Start date
Boilermaker
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2010
- Messages
- 1,332
- Reaction score
- 76
Slickster said:
Be Positive.
Solomon
Master Don Juan
*Sees a bunch of KJing*
*See's Slickster handling business as usual*
*leaves thread satisfied*
*See's Slickster handling business as usual*
*leaves thread satisfied*
( . )( . )
Banned
Maybe your right and I have you confused with someone else , there's only a small handful here who seem to push this whole "my frame is so strong that I don't discuss nor concern myself with current events cause that ain't the way of da PLAYA.... but I shall belittle anyone who does" herpity derpish type bullsh!t which granted may have been cool with the late teen, early 20's crowd a decade ago, but doesn't really fly anymore. I may have lumped you in with them.Slickster said:
Case in point. One of the few bozo's here who constantly tries to sell us all that politics and current events bounce off his superman like frame. Truth be told he most likely doesn't sleep with enough women to warrant the risk of a false rape allegation slapped against him or never had his beta seed used against him and ordered to pay up for 18 years, probably doesn't have enough wealth to be redistributed either, so perhaps he's kind of right in a way.:crazy:Solomon said:
Bokanovsky
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2012
- Messages
- 4,797
- Reaction score
- 4,462
I don't see how that is possible considering that it is for the most part men, not women, who are becoming finically destitute. When Obama talks about redistribution of wealth, he makes it sound like some kind of a Robin Hood thing..taking money from the rich and giving it to the poor and all that. But that's just smokescreen. The rich have an army of accounts, lawyers and offshore investment specialists working diligently to prevent that from ever happening.seasonedplayer said:
But there *is* a very real redistribution of income that's taking place...the transfer of wealth from men to women. Ever notice how predominately male jobs in fields like manufacturing and computer science are being eliminated through outsourcing while predominately female fields like education and healthcare are growing by leaps and bounds as a result of ever-increasing government spending?
( . )( . )
Banned
Bokanovsky nails it again, we are now seeing the fallout of what appears to be a never ending stream of regulations and credentialism is doing to trades and manufacturing. I have a few mates who are very close to throwing in the towel with their own businesses. Once enough of the working class say fvck it it's goodnight Irene.Bokanovsky said:
Womanly economy : http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/womanly-economy/
So much negativity from you Tits? What's up? Did your guy not get elected?
This place has never been a full on PUA community in my opinion. I'm not really sure who you are talking about. This forum has never been about politics or current events either so this is all sounding like frustration to me.
Solomon has always been one of positive guys from what I've seen. Never gives up and is always trying to improve. Isn't that why we come here?
So even if you believe the election is going to change the way we game women, what are your strategies to deal with it? Why not talk about that? If that was the direction of the thread we wouldn't be having this conversation.
It's a site about meeting, dating and attracting women. Not whining, b!tching and moaning about them.
This place has never been a full on PUA community in my opinion. I'm not really sure who you are talking about. This forum has never been about politics or current events either so this is all sounding like frustration to me.
Solomon has always been one of positive guys from what I've seen. Never gives up and is always trying to improve. Isn't that why we come here?
So even if you believe the election is going to change the way we game women, what are your strategies to deal with it? Why not talk about that? If that was the direction of the thread we wouldn't be having this conversation.
It's a site about meeting, dating and attracting women. Not whining, b!tching and moaning about them.
( . )( . )
Banned
Grown men telling other grown men they needn't worry about external factors that may cause long term harm and using lame mainstream shaming tactics to do it "girl deprived, bitter etc" and now your latest ^ is pretty weak though mate.Slickster said:
FFS who is b!tching about chicks and why do you keep saying that? Being pissed off about the state of them and actually getting one is unrelated do you not realise? Learn to seperate what's actually being said. Voicing a negative opinion about leftist ideology, feminism and the damage it's causing is not just reserved for basement dwelling chodes, it concerns EVERYONE, man woman and child. If it upsets you hearing it so much why even bother entering the thread? Or even better move to a more blue pill friendly forum?Slickster said:
This site used to focus more on game, but it's devolving into a whining forum. Life is easier for us now than it ever was for our forebears, but still some guys feel the need to whine about how hard it is to live in the 21st century. Cope. You're living in an age that your great grandfather could mistake for paradise. Easy access to poon. A larger population of better looking girls than any civilization has seen before. A generation of women who voluntarily go Brazilian.
We're not the first generation that has had to deal with *****es, but some posters here weep for some mythic age of perfect women that never really existed. Life is good. Enjoy it.
We're not the first generation that has had to deal with *****es, but some posters here weep for some mythic age of perfect women that never really existed. Life is good. Enjoy it.
( . )( . )
Banned
Hard for me to take you seriously. Your the dude who was saying how great the Wests obsession with fags is though, that the current homomania crammed down everyone's throat is a good thing for our kids as I recall. Surely there's a happy medium?Uberguy said:
Come again? Maybe if he was a minority who took it up the ass and didn't like the idea of hard work or family.Uberguy said:
I think I just heard Heartiste and every other heterosexual male spit out his beer.Uberguy said:
http://bohemechinois.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/fat-women-bbw-singles.jpg
Just to add some relevance to yhe conversation: Do you know what a hijacked programme is? No? You are, as well as your whole country. The same laughing fascism hides in the skin of both your charismatic leaders. It leaked into your machines of bureaucracy and already reigns your lives.
The more improvement we make, the worse we get. This travesty directly results from our sordid 2-party system where Paul was a non-entity. He would have brought home ALL the "defenders of our country" instead of forcing them to languish 9,000 miles away from our shores and their own families with the lie "you are defending our country." Now we reap the disaster of our corrupt election system. """
.
I agree with both of you. But where you see two parties, I see one: The War and Welfare Party. Obama and the Republicans serve the same master, so it's no surprise that Obama capitulates to the R's. The D-and-R rivalry is theater: It keeps us on the bottom at each other's throats, while pacifying us with the illusion that we ourselves have chosen the regime that plunders us and destroys us.
Aristotle and Montesquieu warn that elections lead to oligarchy, not democracy. Instead of "rule by the people", we get rule by the powerful criminal elements that are best able to manipulate and deceive the people. I advocate aleatory democracy or sortition as an alternative -- abolish parties and select our representatives randomly, as we now select jurors or poll participants. Aleatory democracy produces proportional representation over time at minimal cost, while eliminating all of the evils that come with elections -- financial dependency, demagogy, disinformation, cynicism, division....
The more improvement we make, the worse we get. This travesty directly results from our sordid 2-party system where Paul was a non-entity. He would have brought home ALL the "defenders of our country" instead of forcing them to languish 9,000 miles away from our shores and their own families with the lie "you are defending our country." Now we reap the disaster of our corrupt election system. """
.
I agree with both of you. But where you see two parties, I see one: The War and Welfare Party. Obama and the Republicans serve the same master, so it's no surprise that Obama capitulates to the R's. The D-and-R rivalry is theater: It keeps us on the bottom at each other's throats, while pacifying us with the illusion that we ourselves have chosen the regime that plunders us and destroys us.
Aristotle and Montesquieu warn that elections lead to oligarchy, not democracy. Instead of "rule by the people", we get rule by the powerful criminal elements that are best able to manipulate and deceive the people. I advocate aleatory democracy or sortition as an alternative -- abolish parties and select our representatives randomly, as we now select jurors or poll participants. Aleatory democracy produces proportional representation over time at minimal cost, while eliminating all of the evils that come with elections -- financial dependency, demagogy, disinformation, cynicism, division....
seasonedplayer
Don Juan
Yes, you have nailed it. And to add to this, look at the proportion of single female voters for Obama.i think it was in the high 60s. I live in NYC and there are almost no men's jobs left - wall st has been decimated, corporate strategy jobs gone and no growth in science/engineering. Instead the city is full of ugly feminists either administering or employed by companies/law firms to comply with rules and regulationsBokanovsky said:
