What do you guys think about this..
On one hand I want to do be doing fun things, that sometimes require investment on my part in terms of time and money, as this creates for a more fun date and there's always stuff to talk about and chance for competition and kino.
But on the other hand, I don't want to appear to be trying to hard, and I do want to make sure the girls interested in me, rather than just the fun stuff we're doing. (To counter this I've not been telling them what it is until we meet).
This question is aimed at the first few dates. The activities I'm talking about are nothing overly expensive, just climbing, bowling, dograces etc. All with alcohol obv.
I think it's good that she has a good time, but you don't want to set a precedent as being the guy who puts in so much effort and always has to be doing stuff, (i'm not a performing seal)...idk... it just seems like if we did drinks and bowling for date 1, then to only do drinks on date 2 is a bit of a step back.
What dya reckon guys?
On one hand I want to do be doing fun things, that sometimes require investment on my part in terms of time and money, as this creates for a more fun date and there's always stuff to talk about and chance for competition and kino.
But on the other hand, I don't want to appear to be trying to hard, and I do want to make sure the girls interested in me, rather than just the fun stuff we're doing. (To counter this I've not been telling them what it is until we meet).
This question is aimed at the first few dates. The activities I'm talking about are nothing overly expensive, just climbing, bowling, dograces etc. All with alcohol obv.
I think it's good that she has a good time, but you don't want to set a precedent as being the guy who puts in so much effort and always has to be doing stuff, (i'm not a performing seal)...idk... it just seems like if we did drinks and bowling for date 1, then to only do drinks on date 2 is a bit of a step back.
What dya reckon guys?