Seems like you are trying your hardest to make it out to be no big deal.zekko said:I can't condone what Josh Duggar did.
Lame excuses you are making here. You believe that 14 year olds can do whatever they want because you claim they have no self control?zekko said:I think we can all agree to some extent that "playing doctor" and sexual curiousity is natural to some degree. Like so many things, the question is where do you draw the line. Stagger seems to think the line is when you turn 16. Reading this thread, apparently many think it's okay if you're seven. Duggar was 14, and Rex at least was ready to beat him up and hand him over to the government.
I'm just not so sure that at age 14, a kid should be expected to have the wisdom and self control of Solomon. In my mind, a 14 year old is a minor. Again, in Duggar's case, I agree he went too far. But I read one incident was with his sister of 12.
zekko said:Just hypothetically, would you be willing to disown your son if he was 14 and his sister was 12? What if they both said it was consentual experimenting? Of course the older one would be more responsible, but at 14, wholly responsible?
I'm just curious as to where y'all think the lines should be drawn.
Would you be cool with your oldest son performing sexual acts on your younger daughters for years? It would not bother you what he was doing to hurt them? You would play it off like "eh no big deal"?