Don't speak to women you're attracted to...or risk arrest?

Stugots26

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
407
Reaction score
208
Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd so it begins:

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/10/31/do-we-need-a-law-against-catcalling?ref=opinion

Are you serious?

First of all, letting cops make the call is a frightening thought.

Secondly, how is anyone going to prove any specific person said any specific thing on the street? Or didn't say it?

Third, certain legal definitions come into play. Civil or criminal assault is defined by a reasonable apprehension of immediate harmful or offensive contact. Anything less is not assault. Harassment needs to be threatening.
So now we're extending criminal liability to female insecurities. What's next, a woman's emotional response to the way a man looks at her?

Fourth, obviously, Freedom of Speech. Obscenity has been best characterized by the Supreme Court as "you know it when you see it," but is really has to appeal only to the "prurient and morbid interest in sex." Catcalls, while certainly uncouth, are typically not obscene. Beyond that, I fail to see how this passes equal protection, because the law would have both discriminatory intent and discriminatory impact against men.
 

LMFAO

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
760
Reaction score
40
They should ban saying anything to women by text, email, Whatsapp, phone calls and all other forms of communication. Imagine the desperation of some of these women who suddenly get no attention whatsoever. They'd feel more f**king insecure to the point they really wouldn't know what to do with themselves.

But really this is not practicable solution at all and a waste of police time. The lawyer who suggested this just herself trying to get attention and status, a totally f**king idiotic idea to say the least.

Get a thicker f**king skin, grow up.

If someone is really actually following you continuously then that may be harassment, but if you think saying hi is harassment then you ought to be sent to a mental institution.
 

AttackFormation

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 2, 2014
Messages
4,119
Reaction score
3,661
Age
31
Location
Sweden
LMFAO said:
They should ban saying anything to women by text, email, Whatsapp, phone calls and all other forms of communication. Imagine the desperation of some of these women who suddenly get no attention whatsoever. They'd feel more f**king insecure to the point they really wouldn't know what to do with themselves.
I really think being male for a few years would fix these women. They wouldn't complain about the bad coming with the good.

The other solution would be to abort 60% of males for a 20-80% gender balance, disable interaction between genders on social media and give all the invisible/boring sh!t jobs they can't brag to their girlfriends about their boyfriend having to women so every man is an alpha. Hoo boy, just think of the overnight change.

Or you could turn them ugly for a few years, same effect as being male for a few years.

The other part of the problem is men are caught in a catch-22. If more men stop pandering to women then those who "betray" the collective and still do it have better odds of success, but if everyone does it the odds get lower. But the solution can only be that men stop pandering to women.
 

Stugots26

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
407
Reaction score
208
What you fear you attract.

"OMG men are pigs, they have no self control, only think about sex, and the ones I want never want me, so let's make sure they can't rape, harass, or talk to ANY WOMAN"

then

"Wait a minute, now NO MEN WANT TO TALK TO ME?"

Self fulfilling prophecies abound.
 

What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.

You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

Stugots26

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
407
Reaction score
208
From Chateau Hartiste:

"Ultimately, the problem with stupid, bitter feminists and their lackeys is their inability to understand, let alone empathize, with how differently from women that men are aroused to desire. Once you have convinced yourself that there are no real biological or psychosexual differences between men and women, it’s a small step from there to bemoaning catcalling while your tits are thrust three feet in front of you. This is what a religious adherence to feminist lies gets you: Fear and loathing of men because they get turned on by visual stimulus with an intensity and swiftness that is alien to your gynocentric worldview.

Most women who aren’t deranged feminists trying to make a victim class point know that, for instance, catcalling is mostly harmless, and take it in stride (even if driven to annoyance by excessive street solicitations). Normal, psychologically healthy women (read: pretty women), intuitively grasp that men and women are very different on and under the hood. They may not know the evolutionary reasons for the differences, or care to know, but their acceptance of men as men permits them to behave in a more charming feminine manner, and to appease men’s desire (or avoid inciting it when necessary) because it’s fun and exciting instead of an “injustice” that must be raged against. Feminist spite and resentment towards men comes from a place of studied ignorance and, in some instances, envy of male sexuality. I think a lot of avowed feminists are ugly broads who secretly yearn to possess the liberated and unencumbered sexual joy that is the birthright of men.

If there’s one common bond that unites all feminists and feminist-lite pundits, it’s a loathing of male desire. Scour away the SJW jargon and that’s the angry little id you’ll find deep inside shaking a clenched black fist at an unforgiving reality it cannot change."

Hot women are more confident and aren't offended by male sexuality. They're much cooler to hang around and typically want men to be men. Certainly my plate wants me to be a man. Anything less than being an aloof a$$hole and she's told me she begins to question a man's heterosexuality.
 

foreverAFC

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
1,213
Reaction score
138
That harassment video really puts some things in perspective, but I gotta say, black guys they really set you up on this one didn't they
 

VladPatton

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
234
Location
NYC
To hell with approaching. Have you tried to talk to a female lately without using a cell phone and emoticons, LOL, WTF, IMHO, AFAIC, #hashtags, and Likes??? It's a fücking nightmare! So, this is good. Tell us all to leave you the hell alone, and we will, while you drift into the cyber world and leave the realms of this universe.

Without them realizing it, they are thinning their own herd. Sometimes, for business, I call up one of these "cool new modern chicks" up to ask a question, and they can barely talk on their feet. The fück you gonna do in real life, or should I say IRL with one of these Apple-androidian Twitter twits? Shıt's gettin really fücked, fellas.
 

zekko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
16,076
Reaction score
8,926
Damn, that silly video of the girl walking down the street has exploded to the point where they now want to make catcalling illegal? Wow, just wow. Something looks harmless on the surface, but if it gets too big the legislators get involved.

I love the comments on the article by John Brown of San Fransisco:

Given recent discussions on here, it is obvious that the only truly effective solution is ban all non-business/emergency communication between males and female strangers in all situations for the following reasons:

1) Since women are inundated with salutations from males on a daily basis, banning all non-business/ER communication is the only way to minimize the burden on women. No particular male can know how many other men have said hello to a woman on any given day. So, banning non-business/ER communication is the best solution.

2) Since many women see all male strangers as potential rapists and talking with them is thereby an unnerving for women, banning non-business/ER communication is the best solution.

3) Since some women have been traumatized by men in the past and talking with them is thereby an unnerving for women, banning non-business/ER communication is the best solution.

For women wishing to find a male mate, women can use online dating sites. Even those online dating sites could be modified to *not* allow men to initiate communication with women.

To further minimize the discomfort of women, streets, offices, bars, places of worship, public transportation and so on could be segregated by gender.


Funny thing is, aren't there already dating sites where men can't initiate contact with the women, only the women can? I know other sites restrict how far outside a man's own age group he can go to contact a woman.
 

skinnyguy

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 2, 2013
Messages
3,446
Reaction score
1,258
I want to see a response video of men telling a girl she is ugly.

She would probably end up sleeping with them.
 

bigneil

Banned
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
8,377
Reaction score
2,696
Location
Texas
zekko said:
Damn, that silly video of the girl walking down the street has exploded to the point where they now want to make catcalling illegal? Wow, just wow. Something looks harmless on the surface, but if it gets too big the legislators get involved.

I love the comments on the article by John Brown of San Fransisco:

Given recent discussions on here, it is obvious that the only truly effective solution is ban all non-business/emergency communication between males and female strangers in all situations for the following reasons...

I saw this same, horrifying comment by the same lesbian, bull-dyke Government troll who was hired for that reason (she chose a very male sounding name as her cover).

And don't you love how fat, unattractive, feminist women like author Laura Beth Nielsen (aka John Brown of SF) want to take issue with men hitting on women who are attractive and feminine? You can see where their incentive arises: hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. For their whole lives they have watched as every man they ever liked preferred skinnier, more fertile women. Yet these women never once put the donut down. Now that they have reached middle age they are ready to start pressing charges.
 

Peaks&Valleys

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
1,957
Reaction score
351
bigneil said:
And don't you love how fat, unattractive, feminist women like author Laura Beth Nielsen (aka John Brown of SF) want to take issue with men hitting on women who are attractive and feminine? You can see where their incentive arises: hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. For their whole lives they have watched as every man they ever liked preferred skinnier, more fertile women. Yet these women never once put the donut down. Now that they have reached middle age they are ready to start pressing charges.
This all day.

The attractive women know how to handle the attention. A lot of times they bask in it and, if anything, they turn the attention in their favor and use these men. Others just accept it as part of life and "deal" with it. But it's lower echelon that want to make it a crime for men to give their attention to these good looking women.....because men are not giving it to them.
 
Top