Love Shogun Samurai Slash of Truth:
The original point of feminism was female empowerment, not male dis-empowerment.
Read some of their stuff from the sixties and seventies, and replace every mention of women with men, and you basically have the SS forums.
Now, fast forward 30 years when people get complacent because of all the support they're receiving from their fellow human beings, and they get lazy. It's no longer about "work for what you want" - it becomes "you have a RIGHT to this, you have a RIGHT to that."
So, I'll be the first to admit that feminine doctrine has skewed from its original purpose of creating strong women, suitable for functioning independently in society. It has instead begun creating whiny, bratty, self-entitled AWs.
But, if on the other side of the coin, the fall of feminism concerns me MUCH less than the fall of masculism. Naturally, because I'm a man, and only I can fix my problems. Women will be women - they play their game, we play ours. This is the way it should work.
But, not according to most people on SS. Most of the time when someone new posts, it's about how they think they deserve this or that, or that the game is full of BS and the rules should change. Basically, a bunch of whiny people waiting for the world to be handed to them.
Once again, we only need to look at the AFC posts on SS to see this.
And how far HAVE we fallen?
Well, the true spirits of feminism and masculism are thus: To achieve your goals, empower yourself
What both have become, because of modern societies tendency to baby everyone, is thus: To achieve your goals, dis-empower and hate on the opposite group, while pretending to empower yourself with posturing, routines, and social trickery/manipulation.
To me, that's worse than communism. The commies were always blaming these people or those people - but at least the commies had the balls to do something about it instead of waiting for the legal system to "sort things out" for them.
See, the thing about true feminism (like being a real Don Juan), is that it's not easy, and requires a lot of hard work and sacrifice. When a woman is faced with that choice, or just shaking down an AFC for everything he's worth, of COURSE she's gonna take the easy route and say she has "rights to half."
And there's no way that any of us could say that if we were faced with the same choice, we wouldn't think really damn hard about it.
In marriage, the right to half was supposed to bring about the expectation that the woman was supposed to bring half to the table. Somewhere along the line, both women AND men got complacent. But, this is the natural way of things - even though all people are capable of being happy and fulfilled by themselves through inner game, most will choose the path of weakness and seek their happiness from external objects.
Most of you will disagree with this. I will give exactly zero flying f*cks.
