SexPDX
Master Don Juan
Being a challenge for a woman is widely thought of as a Don Juan priciple. While being a challenge does have it's role in seduction I disagree with those who assert that it CAUSES a woman to be attracted to you.
She simply won't be attracted to you because you would be a challenge for her to get. She becomes attracted to you because you show her VALUE. Challenge without value percieved on her part will do nothing. Think about someone your know who you are not attracted to and they are not attracted to you, but each of you would be a challenge for the other to seduce. How likely do you suppose it is that the two of you will start attracting each other because each other would be a challenge? Not gonna happen, right? Right.
Now that I have destroyed challenge as the possible cause of an initial attraction, what is left to discuss is how it affects an EXISTING attraction. And it turns out it DOES affect it very well IF you have showcased some VALUE to her that CAUSED the attraction which the challenge aspect of the seduction would be MEANINGLESS without.
So...why is "being a challenge" discussed here so much while "demonstrating value" is RARELY mentioned outside of a very limted set of ideas? Could it be because the guys here are used to the WOMAN being the challenge and not THEM and they now get a charge out of the idea that THEY can be the challenge? If I am right then that is perfectly normal but lets not lose sight of the big picture.
That being said, here are the only methods of showing value I see discussed here FREQUENTLY:
1) Alphaness, Being the Man (Pook stuff)
2) ****y and Funny (David Deangelo stuff)
3) Not getting personal validation from women
All good stuff, guys, but there is A LOT more to it than that. I will suspend my own comments until I see what others say.
Nick
------------------
- The seductionist formerly known as trickynick
You either own the game or it owns you.
~"Pon atencion al latido de tu corazon...y el ritmo de tu respiracion...como te permites llegar a ser completamente llevada...por la conexion que esta tomando lugar." ~
She simply won't be attracted to you because you would be a challenge for her to get. She becomes attracted to you because you show her VALUE. Challenge without value percieved on her part will do nothing. Think about someone your know who you are not attracted to and they are not attracted to you, but each of you would be a challenge for the other to seduce. How likely do you suppose it is that the two of you will start attracting each other because each other would be a challenge? Not gonna happen, right? Right.
Now that I have destroyed challenge as the possible cause of an initial attraction, what is left to discuss is how it affects an EXISTING attraction. And it turns out it DOES affect it very well IF you have showcased some VALUE to her that CAUSED the attraction which the challenge aspect of the seduction would be MEANINGLESS without.
So...why is "being a challenge" discussed here so much while "demonstrating value" is RARELY mentioned outside of a very limted set of ideas? Could it be because the guys here are used to the WOMAN being the challenge and not THEM and they now get a charge out of the idea that THEY can be the challenge? If I am right then that is perfectly normal but lets not lose sight of the big picture.
That being said, here are the only methods of showing value I see discussed here FREQUENTLY:
1) Alphaness, Being the Man (Pook stuff)
2) ****y and Funny (David Deangelo stuff)
3) Not getting personal validation from women
All good stuff, guys, but there is A LOT more to it than that. I will suspend my own comments until I see what others say.
Nick
------------------
- The seductionist formerly known as trickynick
You either own the game or it owns you.
~"Pon atencion al latido de tu corazon...y el ritmo de tu respiracion...como te permites llegar a ser completamente llevada...por la conexion que esta tomando lugar." ~