Doc Love Is Crazy and if You Follow His Advice, You Are Too!

bigneil

Banned
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
8,377
Reaction score
2,696
Location
Texas
Doc Love is correct on many cases and he has boiled things down to a distilled and time-tested set of formulas:

1) Female Interest Level is the most important element of the relationship. Her Interest Level is the real difference behind moodiness versus horniness.

2) A man should focus on increasing HER interest level (not projecting his own).

3) Female Attitude is hard-wired and cannot be changed (you want a Flexible Giver).

4) Men need the 3 C's (Confidence, Control and Challenge).

5) Once her interest level drops below a certain point, it will never return.

I rank Doc Love's book, The System (which I bought in '04), among the top 5 dating books along with Art of Seduction (Greene), Rules of Power (Greene), How to Succeed with Women (Louis/Copeland) and How Can I Get Through to You (Foster).
 

jennybythesea

New Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am not sure what to make of The System. I only know thati met a guy thati liked and he started doing some of this and it made me think he did not like me very much. No woman wants to feel unwanted. I agreed to one last date because I wanted to tell him in person that I did not understand why he would ask me out if he did not like me very much and that he had hurt my feelings on too many occasions. When you meet a nice, pretty girl with a big heart, killer body and brains and money to boot, don't follow this system. The guy I am seeing now does not hold as much interest for me as Mr. System. But he is kind. The guys that use this, just come off as being cold and unkind. So I cut my
losses and left him sitting at a table at a restaurant. He sent me a message the next day and I told him I never wanted to see him again and that I wished him well in finding the right woman. He sent me two more messages but I never responded. Behaving this way can be hurtful and I decided I would not sign up for that, the good women with kindness and live to give are going to just stop answering the phone when it's you and you may never know how
much you hurt them.
 

donking

Senior Don Juan
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
240
Reaction score
14
jennybythesea said:
The guy I am seeing now does not hold as much interest for me as Mr. System. But he is kind (nice guy).
proves the rule... duh...
 

bigneil

Banned
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
8,377
Reaction score
2,696
Location
Texas
I like Doc Love, and once owned and read The System (in 2004).

I just don't take him seriously with his "Once her interest level goes below 50% it never comes back" theory, because if you can't measure interest level precisely how can you set a hard-and-fast rule on the percentage?
 

Solomon

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
5,632
Reaction score
2,795
Location
Inside her mind
I use to read Doc's love articles back in 2008 when i first was trying to improve my game, even then I knew the guy was full of crap with some of the advice he gave. i.e. get the house phone number, sorry but 18-25 girls, don't have house phones

bigneil said:
Doc Love is correct on many cases and he has boiled things down to a distilled and time-tested set of formulas:

1) Female Interest Level is the most important element of the relationship. Her Interest Level is the real difference behind moodiness versus horniness.

What about my interst what about my wants? this contradicts the rule of the "prize" mentality

2) A man should focus on increasing HER interest level (not projecting his own).

What about my interst level? this is catering to the puzzy another reason why your dealing with pain from a stripper
3) Female Attitude is hard-wired and cannot be changed (you want a Flexible Giver).

meeeeh, it can if you give are hard stiff cvck :crackup:

4) Men need the 3 C's (Confidence, Control and Challenge).
agreed
5) Once her interest level drops below a certain point, it will never return.

agreed

I rank Doc Love's book, The System (which I bought in '04), among the top 5 dating books along with Art of Seduction (Greene), Rules of Power (Greene), How to Succeed with Women (Louis/Copeland) and How Can I Get Through to You (Foster).

Doc love IMO is the same as Anti dumb, I mean Anti-dump Sexpdx broke it down the best why both methods are outdated and why guys like Big Neil will always be a step behind...

I don't post much anymore and even spend very little time lurking. However, showing up and seeing an Anti-Dump post on the main page of the site is frustrating nonetheless. I realize that you guys who post on the forum don't decide what articles go on the main page of the site, Allen does. Also, I don't read what is posted here enough to know how much Anti-Dump's ideas influence this place anymore.

To reiterate my main disagreements with Anti-Dump there are two main ones. First is that his whole approach appears to be aimed entirely at finding the "most interested woman" you can possibly find. I believe guys should definitely want to find a woman who is interested in them but her interest in you is just part of it. What about YOUR interest in HER. Since Anti-Dump was mostly focused on finding a woman to marry this is really important. I definitely think that most of us have certain qualities we look for in a woman besides just how interested she is.

What we learn in this community (in my interpretation) has always been about making ourselves more interesting to women in general. Assuming we come to be successful at this, there will actually be MANY women who are interested in us. Due to this increased general female interest in us, we will be in a position to see which of these women WE are most interested in. In short, that the woman's interest in us, which is nonetheless important, should be some sort of prime directive seems silly.

Second, because Anti-Dump's approach is all about finding this postulated "most interested woman" his methods for interacting with women seem to involve a lot of tests to see how interested she is in you. There is nothing wrong with testing a woman's interest but there is the issue of CREATING the supposed interest that is being tested of which Anti-Dump's approach seems destitute. He seems to believe that a woman's interest in you comes from seeing you for the first time and nothing else. Based on my experiences, I don't consider this an accurate description of the facts of life. Maybe if you are a boxer brief model it is closer to the truth but for the rest of us a woman's interest in us depends largely on our communication, and by improving our skills in that respect we are able to interest more women.

Having said all that, the article which now sits on the front page of sosuave.com is as flawed as any of Anti-Dump's ideas, if not more so. The idea that a woman will be think you are "in demand" as Anti-Dump puts it because you carry a paper and pencil is off base. Just because you are prepared to get phone numbers says nothing in the world about whether or not you are getting laid. I have done A HELL of a lot of PU and the times in my life when I was getting the most phone numbers were not when I was getting laid the most, not by a longshot. If your conversation skills suck and you don't create solid rapport and attraction she is not going to be suddenly attracted to you because you whip out a pencil and paper to get her phone number. On the other hand, if you have an awesome conversation with you that fascinates her and draws her deeply into you she isn't going to be totally appalled when you finally ask for her number and say, "gee, I don't have a pen, let me get one."

Anti-Dump also says in this article that there are two kinds of women who will not like you for carrying a pencil and paper for numbers and one of them is one with emotional problems who "can't stand the thought of competing with others." First of all, the idea that she is going to believe she is competing for you based on your having a pencil and paper has no basis in reality, even in a woman's mind. Most women have seen many guys who carry such things and many of them aren't getting laid and women are able to tell that is the case. Second, most women have emotional problems, it is more a questions of which ones you can deal with and which ones you can't than it is finding a woman with none whatsoever. If you know which emotional problems you simply can't deal with there better ways of finding if she has THOSE problems. That topic is beyond the scope of this post but those tools exist. The notion that carrying writing utensils is some sort of screening mechanism for emotional health is laughable.

None of this is to say that carrying a pencil and paper to write down numbers is a bad idea. Only that Anti-Dump reads way too much into the message it sends to women and how they will react to it. At best, to say you should carry a pencil and paper is a nuts-and-bolts tip. It is convenient to do so, and it goes no deeper than that.

This is another example of how he focused on the wrong things. The quality of your interactions with women are where you want to focus your energy. That is where attraction is created and you learn about her, whether you are even interest in her and if you are, what you have to do to make it happen (whatever "it" is).

-PDX
 

Solomon

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
5,632
Reaction score
2,795
Location
Inside her mind
floydb25 said:
All dating guru's have sound advice, and understand the nature of attraction. The only problem is their delivery. They are annoying as balls, and don't get to the point without being condescending, arrogant, or using capital letters to emphasis their point. They're also too repetitive and have imaginary friends. At the end of the day, they're just trying to make money, and aim to acquire this in any way possible. It's just another business, and it shows big time. They're not genuinely interested in helping the audience. Not much different from all those crappy infomercials; equally as irritating, and automatically avoided / skipped over.
I disagree some dating guru's have terrible advice, and not just pua's but actually dating guru's

Most of the stuff is fluff.

I've read over 30 doc love articles and I reckon only 5 of them he is spewing any advice that's worth following

The guy's system is outdated, I mean who the hell still ask for home phone numbers? unless your dating 50 year olds sureeeeeeeeee that 19 year old hottie probably doesn't know how to use a landline

:crackup:
 

Andysecher

New Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2013
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
bigneil said:
Doc Love is correct on many cases and he has boiled things down to a distilled and time-tested set of formulas:

1) Female Interest Level is the most important element of the relationship. Her Interest Level is the real difference behind moodiness versus horniness.

2) A man should focus on increasing HER interest level (not projecting his own).

3) Female Attitude is hard-wired and cannot be changed (you want a Flexible Giver).

4) Men need the 3 C's (Confidence, Control and Challenge).

5) Once her interest level drops below a certain point, it will never return.

I rank Doc Love's book, The System (which I bought in '04), among the top 5 dating books along with Art of Seduction (Greene), Rules of Power (Greene), How to Succeed with Women (Louis/Copeland) and How Can I Get Through to You (Foster).

Just curious to know....when a girl breaks up with a guy and goes back to him after dating a few others, how has the interest level made its way back?
 

Dust 2 Dust

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
2,172
Reaction score
685
Location
Florida
Andysecher said:
Just curious to know....when a girl breaks up with a guy and goes back to him after dating a few others, how has the interest level made its way back?
Doc advises his students to never take back an ex. You can win back an ex, but Doc says she is returning for all the wrong reasons. She is bored, lonely, and failed to snag another man so she settles for you as a consolation prize. Doc preaches 1 chance per woman per lifetime.
 

Greggie W

New Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2013
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
Good advice

I think Doc Love's System has many valid points, principles, etc... It's not the answer to every possible scenario but it gives men a foundation to build on.

Yes, some of the material can be updated (i.e. the home phone number question) but use a little common sense and apply here as needed.

For women, I believe they see it as a threat because women have been nothing but "playing games" for years...and it seems to be the norm in society.

Doc Love even explains that: you should not use women, you should show class around women (not be rude or crude), you should shoot for a healthy, balanced relationship.

For years, women have been getting help for every magazine under the sun regarding dating, love and tips on "how to get the man to fall in love with you".

Now, women are upset because someone (a man) comes along to give men the same advice? Really?
 
Top