But good and bad are subjective, not universal rules, so how would the higher power determine if you've been bad or good?
- The killing of a chicken is "bad", but without said chicken people would not be fed which is "good".
- The breaking of a window is "bad", but without said broken window the business that's employed to fix said windows would have no revenues/jobs, which are "good".
- Crime is bad, but without it policemen would have no jobs.
- Buildings on fire is bad, but without them fireman would have no jobs.
- You can make the argument that killing people in a foreign country is bad, but without said acts the people who join the army would be out of a job and free college tuition bill.
What's bad and what's good? Who is the good guy and who is the bad guy? The reality is that everything has aspects of good and bad in it, just as everybody has aspects of good and bad within them. What determines what is good or bad, is based on the perspective of the variables in place. Again, people not knowing how to use a stove properly and setting their house on fire is bad, but without said stupidly, firemen would have no employment, which makes their stupidly in a way a blessing to the fireman.