Do you agree with Pook on this?

[Purefilth]

Depends who it is.

Me? Well here are a few things that result in Niagara Falls occurring between my legs:

A guy who can make me laugh until I want to tear my clothes off and furiously screw his brains out.
A guy who is relaxed around me.
A guy with a passion for psychological discussion and theory.

i call Bullshiit.

Depends who it is.

Me? Well here are a few things that result in Niagara Falls occurring between my legs:

A guy who can fight
A guy who at least 6 foot tall
A guy with a body like a greek god.

there - i fixed it for you.

 

[Halcyonique]

i call Bullshiit.

there - i fixed it for you.

Keep callin'. Guys who take the time to correct me on my personal preferences - based on the mere fact that I possess tits and a vagina - are always fun.

1. Fighting - especially physical - to me, shows weak-mindedess and an inability to resolve conflict via verbal communication, which I value highly.

2. I'm 5 ft 5. And, although if the man is a lovely guy, height goes out of the window - whether he's extremely short or extremely tall - I would, admittedly prefer to perhaps kiss him when being fvcked, or at least be able to see his face, rather than just getting a face-full of his neck.

3. Body like a greek god, as in extremely muscular? I prefer a softer body that I can snuggle up to. It doesn't help that every man I've ever known who worked out to gain a physique like that in the first place, has been vain, shallow and aggressive. Kind of like those ladies who obsessively visit the tanning salon with their "girls".

 

[Die Hard]

Here we go again... Another thread is about to get messed up because a woman enters. And the funny thing is SHE is not the one messing it up, it's the GUYS who can't keep themselves from taking her bait, even though they know better...

 

[Halcyonique]

Yeah women HATE those guys lol

Correction: I do.

"Women" is not a term by which you can apply a basic collective of generalized attributes to. True enough, there are plenty of women who seem to go mad for dumb but chiseled a$$holes, just as there are plenty of men who go mad for dumb, hot b!tches.

 

[Wolfgang D]

i call Bullshiit.

there - i fixed it for you.

If she says those are her preferred traits, it is reasonable to think it is true. She takes the time to wade into a forum that is all-male territory and post her thoughts in more than sixty posts without being combative; obviously she is not the average poster you will see on forums like, say, girlsaskguys.com., where there is a lot of that feel-good philosophy I mentioned earlier.

 

[Purefilth]

If she says those are her preferred traits, it is reasonable to think it is true. She takes the time to wade into a forum that is all-male territory and post her thoughts in more than sixty posts without being combative; obviously she is not the average poster you will see on forums like, say, girlsaskguys.com., where there is a lot of that feel-good philosophy I mentioned earlier.

I have no doubt that in her head those are her preferred traits. Doesnt mean they make her panties wet.

Since when have we decided that because a woman says something it must be true.

Because she disagrees with me I must be wrong, right?:rock:

 

[Halcyonique]

Since when have we decided that because a woman says something it must be true.

Well sir, why wouldn't you believe me?

Because I'm female? And females are lying, brainless morons? Perhaps mentally inept creatures incapable of speaking an ounce of truth? In which case I can't imagine why you'd dedicate any amount of time to seeking such a being, if we - as a gender - cannot even do so much as even think for ourselves.

Actually... what is it if you actually had sex with (or wanted to have sex with) such a mentally incapable individual?

 

[Halcyonique]

Thank you Wolfgang_D.

My only real intention here, is to say that not all women are this:

Pook tapped on the Woman with his pointy stick. “Women,” he said, “are entirely sexual creatures. They do not respond to your intellectualism. They do not respond to your genius. They only respond to sexuality.”

I know that if I were a man - especially if (as I understand some members here are / do / have) I had some difficulty understanding women, or lacked contact with them - the idea of women being this way would terrify me. Sincerely. It would chill me to the core, especially if I may have been looking for advice on how to find a long-term female companion with whom I could actively share my interests with. Or not even that - simply share anything other than sex with.

Human beings in general are sexual creatures, but not entirely. We have interests, occupations, fascinations, activities, etc, which are detached from sex. There indeed exist people who are more sexually driven than others; there exist people who are more intellectually driven than others, and everything inbetween. And so, it is brazenly incorrect to declare that women as a whole are entirely sexual creatures. It's even worse to state that women "do not respond" to intellectualism, or genius.

A man who says this is outright preying on the naivety of other men, which I think is quite cruel considering the weight of his opinion. His status is such, that there are many men who take his word as the word of god far above any female who would greatly object to this on a factual level. And yet, to fully imbibe this notion that your female counterparts are so sexually driven, and aren't attracted to intellect or genius could further isolate men who already feel isolated enough as it is, without such bullcrap misinformation.


"Purefilth" {below post} - How unfortunate. So, in your mind, a woman cannot like such things, without you rushing desperately to your bright pink font and emoticons to make a sub-par effort at parodying her for it? How harrowing; you have my deepest pity. I am sure your outlook ensures that you stay popular with the ladies.

 

[Purefilth]

Well sir, why wouldn't you believe me?

Because I'm female? And females are lying, brainless morons? Perhaps mentally inept creatures incapable of speaking an ounce of truth? In which case I can't imagine why you'd dedicate any amount of time to seeking such a being, if we - as a gender - cannot even do so much as even think for ourselves.

Actually... what is it if you actually had sex with (or wanted to have sex with) such a mentally incapable individual?

Mostly because this thread appears pointing that women arent turned on by intellect and you appear.

look I'm a girl!!:cheer:
I love Intellectuals:cheer: :cheer:
Philosophical conversations turn me into niagra falls:cheer: :cheer: :cheer:
Woohoo!! Look guys - a woman who likes Intellectuals!!:cheer:
Arent I special, Pay attention to meeee!!!!

What an appeal for attention! Typical Girl.

And poor wolfgang fell for it.

 

[Fruitbat]

Be careful.

Bear in mind women aren't QUITE as visual as we are, and DO look at more, even in a sexual light.

Most women are having the same discussion with men about the fact they "Just like barbie dolls with big boobs and butt"

Personally, I like thinner women than barbie doll types...and I genuinely don't find the attitude of a barbie doll attractive.

So, guys, would you rather have an HB9 barbie with a cold and mechanical sexual approach, or a HB7 who is the most sexual being you have ever encountered?

the 2 rarely, if ever, go together IME. So, when I look for a girl, I don't neccesarily look for "boobs, butt, full lips etc". I look for a girl who is sexual and good in bed, and I have minimum standards for looks, obviously.

That is I guess what our lady is saying in her own hamster type of way....

If Purefilth is correct, then HBs would only ever get with muscular 6 footers. We all know this isn't true. It is true, however, that accomplished, succesfull men with money always tend to get HBs. I know several quit hot women who are with really odd guys. If the whole 6 foot thing was the only thing to get women wet, we wouldn't need this forum, or game, or money. I am 6ft 1 by the way and I haven't found it to be the be all and end all.

We are judging women by our own standards.

Wolfgang fell for nothing,

 

[Deep Dish]

Halcyonique:
Human beings in general are sexual creatures, but not entirely. We have interests, occupations, fascinations, activities, etc, which are detached from sex. There indeed exist people who are more sexually driven than others; there exist people who are more intellectually driven than others, and everything inbetween. And so, it is brazenly incorrect to declare that women as a whole are entirely sexual creatures. It's even worse to state that women "do not respond" to intellectualism, or genius.

Halcyonique, you seem like a smart girl and I like your writing style, but you’re missing the point.

Your principle elemental mistake is conflating sexuality with sex. Sexuality is more than sex, more than escalating moves, more than flirting, and certainly more than watching porn. Sexuality is the very fabric of reality. It’s color. It’s swagger and gravitas. It’s power. It’s no surprise that the most sensual girls tend to be artists, artists of their own identity image, interior decorating, and artsy girls are, let’s just say, kinda slutty. (I love artsy girls the most, no wonder.)

Women are entirely sexual because the color of life is sexuality. While you do have “interests, occupations, fascinations, activities” away from sex, you don’t have ultimate truth. And that is the difference. Ayn Rand was a great philosopher, Emily Brontë was the only great female poet, but both were more reminiscent, in mannerisms, style, and appearance, of men.

 

[zekko]

Well sir, why wouldn't you believe me?

Because I'm female? And females are lying, brainless morons?

That is exactly how females are portrayed on this forum.

It's interesting to me that this is a forum about interacting with women. But every time a woman posts on this forum, we are discouraged from discussing anything with her, because she is considered basically a troll, and of course as a female nothing she says can be trusted.

It's also interesting to me that as soon as a woman posts on this forum, everybody goes out of their way to act like an @ss (not only to the girl, but to each other). I guess that is to be expected, since guys are taught here that women only get their panties wet for @ssholes. Maybe they're trying to woo you, Halcyonique.

 

[MikeOck]

Depends who it is.

Me? Well here are a few things that result in Niagara Falls occurring between my legs:

A guy who can make me laugh until I want to tear my clothes off and furiously screw his brains out.
A guy who is relaxed around me.
A guy with a passion for psychological discussion and theory.

I'm not going to argue against you finding those to be attractive traits. Most women like a funny, confident and intelligent man. The problem is that these aren't sexy traits in and of themselves.

The real topic in this thread, as I see it, is that women, in general, respond sexually to sexuality (but only if you first display traits which she finds attractive). A man would be sorely mistaken if he honestly believed that making a woman laugh will result in her tearing her cloths off and furiously screwing his brains out. If the funny, confident, intelligent guy treated you like a sister (as a "nice guy" would) you aren't going to jump his bones. The guy must express his sexuality as well. This could be done through humor (double entendre), or confidence (not shy about expressing his sexual desires), but these things without sexuality are not sexy alone.

 

[Deep Dish]

There’s some science I want to throw into this thread which proves women are entirely sexual.

Women are aroused by watching monkeys have sex, and by watching lesbian sex. They don’t even know it. They universally respond, biologically, to sexual stimuli of any kind, even if they aren’t consciously aware of it. But not men—we know exactly when we’re aroused, and not.

 

[Atom Smasher]

That is exactly how females are portrayed on this forum.

It's interesting to me that this is a forum about interacting with women. But every time a woman posts on this forum, we are discouraged from discussing anything with her, because she is considered basically a troll, and of course as a female nothing she says can be trusted.

It's also interesting to me that as soon as a woman posts on this forum, everybody goes out of their way to act like an @ss (not only to the girl, but to each other). I guess that is to be expected, since guys are taught here that women only get their panties wet for @ssholes. Maybe they're trying to woo you, Halcyonique.

You have to remember, Zekko, that woman who regularly post on a forum like this are FAR from average representative of their gender in any sense. Healthy women with no axe to grind are not sitting around posting on a men's forum trying to prove their pet points.

Looking back on the history of this site, we can see that by far most of them have proven to be attentions seekers looking to stir up the hornets' nest, and the majority have clearly been emotionally imbalanced, to say the least. This may not be true of H, but she still most certainly does not accurately represent the average person of her gender. For starters, she knows some of the big words. She also speaks much more coarsely and than the average female will. In short, she is not a representative of the "average" woman (that being difficult to define, of course) and should not be regarded as such. She is an anomaly, like most women here.

Men get tripped up in thinking that women who post here are an accurate representation of the average female. That never has been nor ever will be the case.

I have also observed and commented that virtually any time a woman either starts, or posts prominently in a thread, the men start turning on each other. I haven't gotten that one figured out yet, except to posit that women tend to be extremely covert and skilled at getting men to turn on one another. Unfortunately, many take the bait.

Edit: School's out! Has Concerned Laurie returned for another go-round?!?!

 

[Sandow]

Once on a road trip, I had a girl ask me questions straight out of a science book I had in the car. I answered nearly all of them right. Right after we pulled over and fvcked. She said she was getting so wet and turned on from all of my answers that we had to pull over. True story. On the other end of the spectrum, I've had a girl get so turned off from science/philosophy talk, I honestly think it's because she just wasn't bright enough. So...different stokes for different folks.

 

[Die Hard]

Here we go again... Another thread is about to get messed up because a woman enters. And the funny thing is SHE is not the one messing it up, it's the GUYS who can't keep themselves from taking her bait, even though they know better...

Let me correct myself: I just realized that you poor souls don't know any better!

Oh well, it was a sh!t thread anyway...

That is exactly how females are portrayed on this forum.

It's interesting to me that this is a forum about interacting with women. But every time a woman posts on this forum, we are discouraged from discussing anything with her, because she is considered basically a troll, and of course as a female nothing she says can be trusted.

It's also interesting to me that as soon as a woman posts on this forum, everybody goes out of their way to act like an @ss (not only to the girl, but to each other). I guess that is to be expected, since guys are taught here that women only get their panties wet for @ssholes. Maybe they're trying to woo you, Halcyonique.

PLEASE respond to this soon, ( . )( . )

 

[( . )( . )]

PLEASE respond to this soon, ( . )( . )

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t33/AJ_Dual/whats-going-on-in-this-thr.jpg

That is exactly how females are portrayed on this forum.

It's interesting to me that this is a forum about interacting with women. But every time a woman posts on this forum, we are discouraged from discussing anything with her, because she is considered basically a troll, and of course as a female nothing she says can be trusted.

You must have missed her earlier posts. She took it upon herself to attempt to shame men into not being repulsed by fat. Her anger in that particular thread and the speed she took her facebook angle pic down confirmed she's a plumper. Combine that with her admitting to being a libtard and proud who also happens to work in the "sex industry" and is "bi" (of course), oh yeah and did I mention how many times she says she's a grrrrl proves she's basically another oxygen thief bringing blue pill poison here who also happens to vote.

It's also interesting to me that as soon as a woman posts on this forum, everybody goes out of their way to act like an @ss (not only to the girl, but to each other).

Bullsh!t.

Penkitten, watertiger, shorty brown, don Juanita to name a few were/are quite intelligent as far as women go, were pleasant most of the time and willing to stfu and listen more times than they had a "grrrrl world" opinion.

 

[Sneevox]

Yes, yes, and yes.
Girls are innately sexual creatures. They are made for bearing children.


Just because they feel emotions and are able to self-identify themselves does not mean they're not primitive like all of the rest of the animal kingdom.

Turn them on and they almost don't know how to say no to you.

 

[zinc4]

So, guys, would you rather have an HB9 barbie with a cold and mechanical sexual approach, or a HB7 who is the most sexual being you have ever encountered?

Both at the same time would be nice.....

Who is this woman in this thread posting crapola for us to read?

Status or perceived status trumps all.....that is all they really care about in the end with looks second....and this girl says a 6 pack wouldn't make her more wet...every thing else being equal that is a lie obviously....she was probably pumped and dumped by a few chiseled guys and now is bitter toward that type.