Bible_Belt
Master Don Juan
I did the same math as you and also read elsewhere other comments that the divorce insurance is quite expensive from a statistical standpoint. The company also sidesteps all state regulation by selling something that lawmakers have not yet decided to regulate. Typical rules for insurance companies, which they avoid, involve asset holding requirements, which make it harder for the company to suddenly declare bankruptcy and stop paying claims.Zarky said:You're paying $38,400 per year for a policy that pays out $250,000? Means that if your marriage lasts 7 years or more you've made a bad decision.
A long time ago, I sold, or at least tried to sell, life insurance. One of the rules of life insurance was that the specific-payout stuff like cancer policies was sold to suckers to make money for agents. The more specific an insurance is, the less value it has.
Because people change.Pierce said:How can someone that loves someone so much that they'd get married do that to the same person they got married too?
And regarding the prenup, I don't see it as hostile, especially in this case where both sides are coming into the marriage with assets. The prenup protects her trust fund money just as much as it protects backbreaker. Most people have no money at all, especially when young and just getting married, so a prenup is pointless. But without a fair prenup anything you take into a marriage is going to become joint marital property.