Disclosure Project - The Coming Release of Free Energy and IFO's (NOT UFO's)

A-Unit

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2004
Messages
1,515
Reaction score
43
Found this video on Google (it works now) on one of my many searches. Haven't watched the whole thing, but it appears interesting based on sources and speculation.


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1776848428018799270&q=billy+meyer

-------------------

As it pertains to the video, one thing that strikes me odd is, if physicists recognize that EVERYTHING is energy deep down to the core basis of life, and the blackness of space is ALSO energy, then why dependence on such LIMITED means of energy?

Effectively, ENERGY is everything and everywhere. It's free! Anybody who's studied JUST the surface of physics, LOA, quantum mechanics etc, knows the smallest particle only has space in it; it's not solid. So how does everything MOVE and ACT if nothing is specifically solid? If everything is "charged", when did it first get its charge? According to laws of energy, it's neither created nor destroyed, so in effect, ALL of life has been, will be, and always shall exist. It cannot be destroyed, just transferred.

Why then can we split atoms, send men to moons, and map genomes, BUT not tap such sources of energy for FREE use?

This crosses the lines of demarcation between conspiracy and reality, but I much prefer CONSPIRACY to reality, because MOST people cease their thinking at the boundaries of what people dub "conspiracy". The minute you think into realms of impossibilities or craziness, people dub you a conspiracy theorist, or a kook. Yet, it's precisely THOSE people whom are responsible for EVERYTHING we have before us. THEY were the unbridled dreamers, NOTHING was too outlandish, crazy, or far-fetched. When did we lose this sense of creativity and imagination?

Even in simplest terms, Ford wante a V-6 and a v-8, and when he asked for it, Engineers said it wasn't possible. Yet, he wanted it, and told them those engineers SOLE mission was to figure it out. And what we have today are far larger than v-6 and v-8's. Just because it wasn't SO then, doesn't make it untrue. If we ceased THINKING and POSSIBILITY only at what physically exists, we'd be scratching the ground for grub worms in Africa still.

Maybe some people have a precondition to THINKING fancifully, or maybe it's genetic, or maybe it's that someone hasn't hardened their heart and mind so much THEY'RE open to possibilities. I really don't know. What I know is, if I ceased deep, creative thinking, I'd feel lifeless. Dead. It's one small piece of what separates man from animals. Without it, or not using it, we are just animals. Some humans are classified as thus today.

On the topic of Energy, why would people slowly release alternate forms of energy, or specifically FREE energy?

Because, of all ASSETS on earth, basic capital assets that support life are the MOST valuable, and therefore hold hostage the wealth inherent on the planet. Those controlling the energy sources, money supply via banking, land, and other "natural resources" suffer no shocks to their wealth through the economy. They can never be out of a job, and the evil and sinister inflation demon ensures that their wealth is always current with present levels of assets.

Economics has 3 classes of assets

1) Capital Assets
2) Services
3) Goods

Capital assets retain the most wealth. Services convert the capital asset into various goods that are sold. Depending which source of "energy" you are determines your stability and wealth potential. Someone who has oil resources, can sell it forever, as long as oil is based in nearly everything we use and every process we use to make things. Just think about how VALUABLE oil is. Not only do we use the DIRECT product, but we use it to convert the goods to other products, and to stay alive, while remaining heated in cold winters, drive cars, fly planes, only to use more oil cooking at the resort we go to. Is it any wonder then energy hasn't been released to be free?

Services are those providing some service, such as health, accounting/IRS, legal advice. Their product is SERVICE, but unless they law claim to a % of the services of others, as in MLM or the ownership of a law firm, services or the "S' box in rich dad won't yield NEARLY the wealth of Capital assets, like oil, land, wood, food, chemicals, metals, etc. That's because the INCOME sources are more limited to what they specifically do, with minor alterations with additional revenue. A tax preparer can add mortgages, or financial planning, but he still MUST be present to collect his money. He can't just sell tax services and also not be at the meeting, or be golfing. Conversely, someone selling barrels of oil only needs to drudge it up, then sell it the world over as its uses are in the thousands. His one source has MANY streams of revenue.

And the person MAKING the goods has but one role, make the goods. Their pay, or wealth is dependent upon their time spent making goods, and no more. Performance reviews my indicate moderate bonuses, but rarely will it yield what Services can, and never will it touch what Capital Assets produce, unless YOU are the producer and owner of the Capital Asset, say, using rubber to make tires and sneakers. Oh, and oil will be needed again, laying further credence to the fact that limitless energy sources EXIST, but will unlikely be released.

The educational system is built to make everyone a GOODs Producer, AND MAYBE a Service person, but never someone who can take possession of capital assets and utilize them for wealth aggrandizement. The tools used in public schools may range in various degrees along the same spectrum, where a wealthier town learns a FEW more skills in Math, or Language Arts, or Music, but never truly learns the skills of capital asset utilization, wealth enhance, money, finance, government, etc. They learn, or are educated in what they are felt is in the BEST interests of society AND NOT THE INDIVIDUAL. Most educational programs ARE NOT meant to teach thinking, to understand the Constitution and workings of government (just vote for who seems coolest they'd say), how to use money (energy) properly, and other, higher level skills and tools. Some might say they had a great teacher, or took upper level calculus, but you never to what end this calculus is valuable. You learn ALOT of history, but the problem is you're still learning HISTORY. You're not learning LESSONS of history, or the truth about the characters of history, and on most accounts, IT IS A FALSE ACCOUNT OF HISTORY. It's always written as if it's FACT, yet facts are just what are pushed to create a false reality for the individual. And when someone tries to shake that reality, it's mostly too infused to be shook free, since it's been stamped in since birth, and then repeated by the parents.

To reach upper echelons of wealth, or independence, which is fine, and right and good, because we must act as if we are independent living together, rather than acting as if we are all one, one must grasp that hierarchy and the fact that NOBODY wants you to rise above it. People rarely do go beyond services. Gates did. But he wielded much power and wealth, and thereby mad other's wealthy, so nobody held him back. In other arenas though, it's not easy to grab a well of oil, or a cave of coal (though in early times, many people had mines in their backyards).

The fact that society is socially engineered is real and true and has been in process for nearly 2 centuries. In the most recent, it's gained momentum, from a national policy of unification and de-emphasis on the individual, to globalization and unification. Initially, people let their rights and jobs slide, because it was felt "Uncle Sam" would care for them. However, the slow degradation of RIGHTS that are inborn, and the loss of national identity and jobs should make those people who died in previous wars and sacrificed and lost, TURN OVER IN THEIR GRAVES.

People need to grasp the constitution in 2 hands, read it, grab it, and register to own a gun. A gun was had not for violence, that was a ploy by clever marketers to surrender the state to paid hitman (aka politicians). Rather, guns were had so the STATE could not EVER take the people down. It was protection of the people by the people for the people against a tyrannical government. And while guns are deemed bad, it's the person, not the gun who's bad. Without weapons, people are defenseless against their elected hitman, who are nothing more than fiduciaries of the elite and powerful special interest groups, while they toss mere breadcrumbs to the populace.

You think Bono (on the cover of Yahoo today) can cure Poverty? How about focusing on FREEING and making independent the people of those nations IN POVERTY, by giving them what they need to establish a working society. Rather, they are oppressed by silly ideals and debt from the IMF, which loans crazy amounts of money to spendthrifts and thieves on behalf of countries, indebts, then leaves the country or steps down. The country is then left holding the bag, using significant tax payments for debt service payments, rather than infrastrustrure.

Ahhh, I'm out. More later.



A-Unit
 

diplomatic_lies

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 4, 2002
Messages
4,367
Reaction score
8
Actually you'd be surprised how expensive and unreliable "free" energy is. Oh, and it isn't free, it costs a lot to build/maintain the infrastructure.

Solar energy is expensive. Wind is expensive and inefficient. Nuclear gets a lot of social criticism (although it is safer than the media makes us believe). Hydro is very expensive initially, and faces environmental criticism (in fact, China's new far-west hydro plant is facing a lot of criticism from hippies).
 

A-Unit

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2004
Messages
1,515
Reaction score
43
Re:

That isn't the only source. Purportedly, Nicola Tesla built a machine that operated by means of gathering the static electricity in the atmosphere and using that to produce energy. Aside from the cost of the device, its cost is relatively low when you consider replacement, refueling, maintenance, etc of other sources. The means you mentioned aren't free by any stretch, they're just "clean." Tesla, amongst other inventors, came up with other devices and contraptions that would have yielded a leap ahead in technology, at least publicly.

If anyone believes in aliens, and their crash on the planet, then it's likely the technology has been reverse engineered but won't publicly expose it as it would confirm the existence of life beyond our own planet.

I agree, the infrastructure for clean sources is more expensive, and exists mostly for those with the budget to afford it or the conscience to suppport it. For the rest, survival of self comes before survival of planet, so nature is sacrificed for the individual. I wouldn't place nuclear power atop the list, though. It generates great amount of waste, pollutes the environment and represents safety threats. At a beach near me, a sign sounds the warning that if in the event of a melt down, no escape is possible. That reactor is about 40 miles from me. Hopefully the fallout would be slow enough I could get out of range of poisoning.

To take deeper trips in space, we won't be using anything like fuel. Having to refuel is what limits our distance. Finding a source, like a reactor that can propel a ship, or a car, through space/time using the forces of nature will be the new innovations. New sources of fuel just prolong our dependence on supply/demand cycles and keep making people wealthy. Capitalism and business exist to provide and service the needs and wants of people, with a bend toward increasing efficiency and possibility, not exploit them as do most corporations.


A-Unit
 

diplomatic_lies

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 4, 2002
Messages
4,367
Reaction score
8
So, what is this "tesla" energy device? I've certainly never heard of it. Except in video games.

I wouldn't place nuclear power atop the list, though. It generates great amount of waste, pollutes the environment and represents safety threats.
Are you basing your observations on facts, or the media frenzy surrounding the Russian nuclear incident? Nuclear power is actually safer than the media depicts.
 

A-Unit

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2004
Messages
1,515
Reaction score
43
Re:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla

That's the wikipedia entry Nikola Tesla.

Check for ebooks using Bittorrent or other programs.

If you haven't heard of him, and the myriad of stories, theories and conspiracies involving Tesla, then the idea of "free energy" might be a new reality to you. Or not.

A-Unit
 

diplomatic_lies

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 4, 2002
Messages
4,367
Reaction score
8
I know who Tesla is, but what is this mysterious "free energy" device you refer to? Can you show me some hard evidence and data relating to this device? Please don't use wikipedia as your source of scientific data...

(As a minor note, energy is never financially "free". The cost to build and maintain energy production is immense.)
 

chickenlegs03

Banned
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
270
Reaction score
8
In the past, I mean before my "experience," I would have said this all a bunch of bullsh*t. UFOs...ha, yeah f'n right...whatever.

But then, a couple months ago, I was just taking pictures with my digital camera near downtown. Bright, sunny day. Barely any clouds...as there rarely are any in the sky here anyway. I was taking pictures of palm trees.

Take a look at this one: http://img214.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc004061tc.jpg

I had no idea what I had caught until I plugged the camera into my pc and looked at the pictures. I thought, 'what the heck is that in my picture...'

HOLY ****. You couldn't fathom the thoughts that ran through my mind. I never believe in any of that UFO sci-fi sh*t. Never a fan, never watched X-Files or any of that crap.

Here is one of the most skeptical people on the planet, and look at that thing in my picture. And what's even more weird is that I still have the raw data on my camera...looking closely at the digital display, you can see the metallic speck while viewing the image in my camera (Sony DSC, 4mgp).

I have showed it to friends and family. There is no explanation. I looked online for flying saucer toys...nothing could come close to this. It's definitely not a toy. You can zoom in 1600% in Photoshop and see the pixels up close. I've analyzed it over and over. It's clearly a flying metallic disk. It is clearly very large because the angle of the palm tree compared to the angle of the disk...makes the disk look very far away...so to show that big in the picture means it's very big. Again, I didn't hear or see anything when I took the picture. I only noticed this AFTER reviewing my images. Thus, it can be concluded that it is also very fast, quiet, and since it is not very blurred, it must have the ability to stop and hover. It freaking boggles my mind everytime I think about it.

To be honest, like I've said repeatedly, I don't really care much about the UFO stuff, so I haven't cared to try and find someone to show it to. Besides, who knows what would happen to my camera if I did, or if I would be forced to shut up or whatever. Not worth it...so I just don't tell anyone important...and just let it be as my "interesting" experience.

edit: I also have absolutely no explanation for the white streak. the whole picture is just mind boggling.

...oh and btw, I watched about 45min of that video...very interesting to say the least. and, I am from NC...so I know who the host, Dr. Greer is, and what hospital he is a doctor at. He is indeed credible.
 

diplomatic_lies

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 4, 2002
Messages
4,367
Reaction score
8
Ummm dude, are you sure that's not a frisbee? The smoking trail also looks like the remains of a skywriting plane.
 

chickenlegs03

Banned
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
270
Reaction score
8
diplomatic_lies said:
Ummm dude, are you sure that's not a frisbee? The smoking trail also looks like the remains of a skywriting plane.
Actually, I'm not sure of anything. But if it was a frisbee then how could it be that high up in the sky? And I honestly don't know any frisbees that are made of metal...at least that thing looks like it is.

Yeah, you're right about the trail most probably. Except that I took two more pictures only a couple seconds later, from a little farther out, and there are no signs of any trails in the sky, which is very weird.

I took these in that similar location, only a minute or two later, at most. It probably can give you a better idea of the size of the tree, and how high up that object must have been. Behind the tree is a mountain...a very high mountain that few people in the area dare to climb because there are supposedly mountain lions near the top.

http://img145.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc004075iy.jpg
http://img380.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc004087bk.jpg

I am still very skeptical myself...I honestly think it's some sort of military surveillance device. But I am convinced there is certainly some technology available that we are not aware of.
 

diplomatic_lies

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 4, 2002
Messages
4,367
Reaction score
8
Distance can be tough to tell in a photograph. I'm not exactly sure what it is (not much of a photo analyst), but I've seen a lot of glitches in my photos before that look like UFOs. I've even got a 35mm shot of a "UFO" inside a crowded nightclub.
 
Top