Smooth Player 056
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2005
- Messages
- 869
- Reaction score
- 3
Clooney I agree.
Diablo - closing threads.
- Thread starter CLOONEY
- Start date
I totally disagree with these guys. As I said in another thread, you can't blame Diablo for applying the rules, you should blame SoSuave's founder for imposing some rules that frankly I don't like either. Rules as "no politics" and "no threads already discussed" are pretty stupid in a forum, since the meaning of a discussion board is to discuss... also things already talked about.
I dont blame Diablo for closing political threads. But this thread was economical, it had a small portion of politics in it, but the vast vast majority was on economics. This is where the rules become blurred, and this is where it is being a nazi closing a thread like that. No other mod closed it, and most over the years I have been here would have let it go on. It was NOT degenerating, and was NOT political. So a few people can go into a thread and say, liberal politics SUCK, and it will be closed? Even if its someones journal on their latest "field reports"? Same difference. A few idiots making political comments does not make a thread political. Thats my problem. I never said Diablo should be banned or have his mod status taken away as I dont post here enough these days to really see any of the posts he has made. I have just noticed a few threads being closed lately that would have not been closed over the last 4+ years. Have the "rules" changed recently?
Blast it all! I thought I logged into the pvussy-gittin forum, not some financial network, not a X-box 360 vs Playstation 3 forum, and certainly not a “George Bush’s eyes are too close together so he’s a retard..” forum.
I am quite surprised that ENTIRE SECTIONS of this forum are not just expunged, like so many super-models’ breakfasts.
I am quite surprised that ENTIRE SECTIONS of this forum are not just expunged, like so many super-models’ breakfasts.
Francisco d'Anconia
Master Don Juan
So what are you saying dude? Does Diablo suck or not?grinder said:
Create self-fulfilling prophecies. Always assume the positive. Assume she likes you. Assume she wants to talk to you. Assume she wants to go out with you. When you think positive, positive things happen.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
NOT.Francisco d'Anconia said:So what are you saying dude? Does Diablo suck or not?
There is too much fat here, trim it, nip it, axe it.
Probably a result of my extremely short attention span. Make me a mod and no post would ever exceed 4 sentences (and non of that weird-ass james joyce thousand-word sentence sh*t!).
47, but I am now reading on a 50 year old level.
I was too vague. My point, there is TOO much here, its not one forum, its 10 and expecting it all to be moderated (properly or not) is unrealistic.
There is a lot of great stuff here, but huge heaps of garbage too that needs to be taken out (by the mods) on an hourly basis.
I was too vague. My point, there is TOO much here, its not one forum, its 10 and expecting it all to be moderated (properly or not) is unrealistic.
There is a lot of great stuff here, but huge heaps of garbage too that needs to be taken out (by the mods) on an hourly basis.
wavejams007
Master Don Juan
actually, I haven't checked out mystery method, and don't intend to. In defense of Diablo, I haven't ever seen him post an illogical or overreacted post, and I have been with this site for a fair amount of time (although of late I have not checked in at all). I respect him. I am not a$$kissing right now, but just stating some truth. Besides, even if Diablo was perfect, he will always have someone to detract from him, as do all authorities.Carlos Xuma said: