Re:
On the Change in Bankruptcy Laws
http://bankruptcy.findlaw.com/new-bankruptcy-law/new-bankruptcy-law-basics/big-changes(1).html
Read up, boys.
Unless you're near poverty line, you'll not be discharging debt anytime soon. The government, in lieu of the massive growth in debt across the country, both federal and personal, has enacted laws to protect companies and prevent would-be debtors from racking up massive debt then discharging it. Just prior to 2006 when this law took effect, tons of filings amounted so that people could sneak under the old rules and start fresh.
Those who will discharge debt, will likely be very poor. The likely victims of this bill are older people, and younger ones. Those raising families will be somewhat shielded from the law's impact.
Student loans are never dischargeable. And students will be hurt since many kids default simply because they pile credit cards on top of student loans and other expenses in pursuit of LIFESTYLE, instead of being financially prudent. Moreover, you can borrow student loans like nobody's business, that's the detriment nowadays.
My buddy's gf can borrow, fully, two years worth of tuition, room, board, and living expenses, all on massive debt, with the EXPECTATION that her medical career (not a doctor) will fund the payback. Her debt will mount over $100,000, and while the debt MIGHT below interest, she'll begin payments near 30, with an expected pay-back period of 15-20 years, of debt tied to a non-appreciating asset. It's well and good because medical professionals earn above the norm, and over the long-term, they will, but her projected income is $90k, after taxes, $70, and then your monthly payments just for debt are $1,000, especially in a rising interest rate environment under fed chairman bernanke. The only way rates will begin coming down in future years are if the economy goes to pot, which is a bad reason for them to fall, since it signals normally less jobs, a bear market, and other declines. For a select few, this won't be a problem, but those not reading Rich Dad, or saving/investing for such days won't be ready.
If you're thinking of college, honestly, go the cheapest route, unless you get scholarships, or have parents/relatives willing to pay for it. The pressure at 22 to pay 200-500 or more per month, when you're not even using that toward rent is massive, and the exit jobs post-college aren't what they used to be, unless you go sales, or get the top 1% of corporate jobs, that would pay such dollars that you can pay it off quickly, it's enslavement to corporate america in most cases.
If people took the blinders off they'd see it for what it is. You go to school, normally subsidizing some or ALL of the debt for average america, with the parent's hopes of a better future. During it, you get ok grades, maybe even great ones, but without experience, or padding of internships and wonderful side projects, you're thrown into a pool of millions of candidates who likely did more than just drink their arses off. Come graduation, you owe a nice payment of $100+, which might be cheap, but for the duration of such payments, you only make the banks rich. And if your payment is higher, then you're really stuck paying back loans, since starting a business or taking a sales job is difficult for those who can't discharge the debt. It'd be 1 thing if at least that debt payment was rent, but it's not, so you're minimum lifestyle income is $1,000, not including food, gas, taxes, utilities, internet which is almost a requirement, and any health memberships, or clothing purchases, just the necessities. Worse off, college molds the long-term student into a tool of corporations, not an independent thinker which has more value to society and to him/herself. And because you want to rise up in the company, the logical step is an MBA, if your field has one, and they'll gladly sign over more money for it, or offer slight tuition reimbursement, because they know you can't rid yourself of the debt, and you'll have to work in your chosen field as you become MORE specialized, you lose opportunities elsewhere, and also lose any type of transferability and mobility, so you're further economically entrenched.
It all sounds like dreary, dreadful days, but it's not. A good college education, nearly paid-up can be a HUGE benefit for the person who wields it right. Only realize that such tools as information and education are akin to owning carpentry tools as a carpenter. It's not the tool that matters, but those who use the tool and their skills that do. A tool (information/education), has no inherent value. You can go to harvard and be at the bottom of your class, and as a result, you might be slightly better than someone from a lesser college who did well. However, if you excel with yourself and build your own personal economic and marketable value in various ways to the stratosphere, your income potential is limitless, and education isn't just limited to the classroom. In fact, that is all TECHNICAL information, the how's, what's, where's, why's, when's, of a robot. Robotic. The better the grade, the more efficient a robot you are. However, it's the interpersonal and personal skills that really determine how high you go. If you're the best TECHNICAL personal at a firm or company, you're TOO valuable to let any higher than what you do, so you'll be given enough raises that it's too difficult to leave. Yet, you know you want more. More free time. More challenges. More sites. New experiences. More resume building opportunities.
You can't get that when the best you can do is precisely what you've always done. This is why pilots, teachers, and truck drivers have unions. Over a long-enough time period, they've acquired few marketable skills that are transferable, and for anyone, in an ever-changing economy, it's vital to be well-rounded. You did know that liberal education was the foundation of the elite and still remains so? That is the cornerstone of elite private education, dating back as far as education begin. It was only the proletariat, the workers, the foundation of society that took technical classes. And there's nothing wrong with that. However, if you're a plumber, wise enough to run his own business and grow it, and also invest in homes, then you're not as bad off as just a plumber that works for a plumbing firm and only does plumbing. That plumber is at the mercy of his industry and employer and at the mercy of his value as a plumber, so long as that keeps up. At some point, it changes, and you want to speak of value, and loyalty, and longevity, and experience, but employers don't care. Bottom line they don't care, because if the employer doesn't concern itself with itself and it goes out of business because of its inability to compete, you're through, too. But if it does concern itself with itself, and can remain an ongoing entity, then it can likely hire another new YOU.
------------------------
Credit Cards are only good to those who are self employed, or can pay them off, or get benefits THAT can pay them off, like fly miles or hotel treats. My uncle pays them off, and uses the 3% cash back to amass extra dough each year. He has several cards and always gets PAID to use them, though he finishes them off each month. Otherwise that's a disincentive.
My accountant/partner always harps on me to use a credit card for business purposes because it tracks all purchases better than a debit card, and checks, and cash.
And my gf's father uses them regularly, but pays them off regularly because he has a corporate allowance, and he gets tons of air miles that he uses on the family. How long this lasts with failing airlines, we don't know, but as banks go, they'll find way to incentivize the use of debt money.
A-Unit