Christina Aguilera Married to Pasty-White Nerd?

[God_of_getting_layed]

Fine. It's a fact. A disputed fact. Kinda like the fact that looks don't matter is a disputed fact. Gotta love finding middle ground.

Well, the evidence that says "looks matters" weighs more than the evidence that says "looks DONT matter".

gotta love proof, evidence, and the scientific method

I'm a year older than you, "son", first of all, and secondly refer to the Looks Matter Megathread in the Archives for any evidence you require.

My usage of the word "son" has nothing to do with age. More to do with my superiority over you in this argument. Okay son?

and another thing, your reference to that mega thread doesnt have a big collection of evidence for your side. your side is still "Evidenceless". And more importantly, there are certainly no explanations that explain ALL AVAILABLE EVIDENCE in that thread. So refering to that mega thread was a very bad rebutal, okay.

The fact that you're nodding in agreement to your OWN statements says it all.

The fact that you dont rebut points of mine that many independant sources would agree are strong is evidence that YOU KNOW YOU CANT REBUT IT BECUASE YOU KNOW IM RIGHT.

so my argument about you actually privately knowing that your wrong in this big debate stands strong!

Please. Even your looks matter cohorts average me at about 8.0 in crappy self-timered pics in bad lighting. And no, I won't say "some women say Im hot", because SOME don't. I get this on fairly regular basis to my FACE. The worst comment on my looks I've ever received, including third-party sources is "pretty cute". Facts are facts, Jack. But again, my looks are a very small piece of the path to enlightenment. There's much more compelling evidence out there.

um actually no. I think there was one guy who said your above average. Everyone else said your either ugly or average. I think one even said you looked like Frankenstein. But lets face it. YOU ARE NOT A HOT GUY. okay! You might be, (key word "might") if your lucky, slightly better than average. A negligable amount above average! and even being that isnt all that great.

The point is, if your not a "hot guy" then your more limited than hot guys out there are if looks matter theory is true. YOU ARE DESPERATE NOT TO BELEIVE THIS! YOU ARE DESPERATE TO BELEIVE YOUR ABILITIES WILL BE UNLIMITED IN POTENTIAL!

Are you seriously baiting me into a HotorNot faceoff? If you really want to, I'll do it I suppose...although proving that I'm better looking than you is pretty pointless imo.

Hey, if you want to put your pic on hot or not and prove to me that you are an "8", please do. Becuase Im really going to need some proof of that at this point.

Horrible analysis. You can't just rephrase my past quotes and expect that crap to work the same vice versa. Come up with your own material.

No, its an excellent analysis.

You "looks DONT matter" goons are desperate to beleive that you have unlimited potential for success. Youre desperate to beleive such rediculous "Sky is the limit, I can do anything and get any woman" kind of thinking. This kind of thinking will require looks to NOT matter, since "looks matter" implies limits! :yes:

I'll make you a deal. If I find 10 polls that list "Confidence" as the number 1/sexiest/most appealing quality in a man by women, then you'll never show yourself in another looks thread. If I can't, then I put "we can see here definitely that looks DO matter! :yes:" in my sig. How's that sound?

Okay, we have a deal!!

you show me 10 credible polls about this, and Ill stay away from looks matter debate. But your polls must be credible. Show me your sources, I WILL CHECK THEM!!!!

 

[spesmilitis]

I don't understand what you all are jelious of. Sure, i'd love to bang her. But I wouldn't marry her for a million dollars, unless I could divorce her after.

 

[chevelle]

I have always hated the old "you are jealous" criticism. Some people, are realists and call it like they see it. Not everyone is a jealous, bitter, person--so get over it!

For you individuals who spend your time defending others, including celebrities, how much money are you making from all of the defending?


....oh yea, the guy is a geek and C.A. is kind of cute (kind of short and dumpy though), but i do see girls everyday who put her looks to shame.

 

[shydude]

Someone is jelious... LOL:crackup: She prob got sick of sexy guys like us and decided to turn into a lesbian.

 

[God_of_getting_layed]

Ok. Send me your best pic, and I'll send you mine. I'm excited about this. Oh, and you may be sorely disappointed about the whole "8" thing, as when I did have a pic up there I was in the high 9's.

So what does my pic/score have anything to do with you truly being an 8+ or not? where does that enter into the equation? hey, if youve already posted your pic, and got "high 9s", then please feel free to post the url so I can see for myself. The burden of proof is on you!!!!

Sounds good.

Yeah, it does sound very good. SO why are my 10 credible polls at huh?

Just when you make it seem like your going to provide some credible evidence, you only further damage the credibility of the "looks DONT matter" side. Are you like secretly trying to destroy the credibility of the "looks DONT matter side" or what? Ive been waiting for you to post these polls for a while now, you havent done it. So whats up man?

no credible evidence from the "looks DONT matter" side again! Shocking :yawn:

 

[Mr. Unique]

losers

 

[BBX]

losers

If he's talking about everyone replying to this sh*t analyzing the aspects of what this means in terms of human nature, yea I second that. Only post worth reading in this thread.

 

[God_of_getting_layed]

You say that hot women will only seek out good-looking men who are of the same caliber of looks as they are. Therefore, if you are the God of getting layed(sic), you will score no less than 10.0 on HotorNot IF what you've been saying has any truth behind it. By the same token, since I'm a WBAFC that has only had a handful of female "companions", I should score around 3.0 on HotorNot IF what you've been saying has any truth behind it. Savvy?

This makes no sense. So your going to draw a connection between the truth of looks matter theory and some guy's hotornotscore who has the screen name "god of getting layed"? So how is some guy with such a screen name and his hotornot score going to provide any information about the truth of wither looks matter to women or not? It wont!

I could just as easily have the screen name "WBAFC", and have a hot or not score of 0 and preach the same looks matter thoery.

Really, weither or not looks matter to women is independant of my hotornot score and my screen name

We've already established the bet, no need to get into the whole multiple exclamation point/excessive font size routine. And considering that "looks" is entirely subjective, "burden of proof" doesn't really factor into this bet.

okay, you came on here claiming you have a high hotornot score, and now its clear your not going to post proof when the burden of proof was on you.

Again Deus, YOU LOSE CREDIBILITY.

When you say "why", you mean "where", right? If so, then I will begin the googling process some time this week. In the meantime, please feel free to peruse any of the number of looks matter threads currently clogging up the bandwidth of SoSuave.net. However, you will have to search manually considering the phrase "looks matter" is too common to enter into the search function.

Yeah, where are my polls?!! where the fvck are they?!!!

begin the googling process NOW, not "some time this week". Unless, you want to lose more credibility :crackup:

 

[selfmademob]

hes jewish

 

[God_of_getting_layed]

Simple. If you are in fact a God of getting laid, then you will be a 10.0 on HotOrNot IF and only if what you've been saying about looks mattering and women only dating men who are as good-looking as they are is true. Also, since I'm a WBAFC and rarely get laid by anybody but my girlfriend at the time, then I should score a 3.0 or less since obviously there are no good-looking men who don't get laid since looks matter to women. Get it?

Weither or not looks matter to women is independant of my screen name and hotornot score. This means learning what my hotornot score is will provide you with ZERO information about weither we live in a world where looks matter to women or or not.

I don't even have a HotOrNot profile. Scroll back; I never said that. And I will post it, after you send me your pic.

So your not going to post it huh. again, lose credibility :yawn:

Unlike you, I actually have a full-time job and can't spend all day appeasing looks-matter fanatics online. I will start some time later this week most likely. Now. If you don't calm down, I can just go ahead and ignore you and we can forget about it all together. How does that sound?

didnt you say that you like to come on here and post on this forum WHILE AT YOUR JOB? :yes: Do I need to pull up your quote from a past thread where you say that you post in this forum while on your job (obviously you must have internet access at your job with no supervision). :yes:

So no excuses, google it NOW! stop procrastinating!

 

[God_of_getting_layed]

So you admit your not a god of getting layed?

my screen name fits me well; I bang plenty of hotties that most men will never know what its like to be with.

But your whole argument was that learning weither or not this is actually true about myself would some how provide us with evidence that the theory I preach must be true or falase depending on weither the screen name fits me well. Im just trying to correct you on such stupid logic. THere is no connection between the my self, my screen name, and the theory I preach. Learning about me and my screen name will tell you nothing about my theory, so why talk as if it will?

Only if your screen name is fraudulent, yes.

um no, If my screen name was found to be fraudulent, we would gain no additional evidence about weither my theory is true or not. If my screen name was confirmed to fit me, then we still would gain no additional evidence about weither my theory is true or not. This is all becuase the theory is independant of my abilities and my screen name. Do you understand what it means for a theory's truth to be independant of some factor such as my attractiveness and screen name?

Did I say that? No. I'll post it as soon as I receive your pic. I just checked my inbox and it's still empty, so...

um, well I have no plans to send you a pic. So it will stay empty, and if you keep your word, you wont be posting any link to your hototnot score.

What this means is that the evidence is still against you; I havent seen your score, but my judgement combined with the statistical fact that most men ARE NOT HOT suggests that its unlikely that youre an 8+. So again, things arent looking too good for you, and untill you post your pic, YOU HAVE NO CREDIBILITY about your claim that goes against the current evidence that we have right now (which says its unlikely that youre an 8+)

Are you asking me or telling me? Because you nodded to yourself after your own statement, so I'm a bit confused. If you're ASKING me, then yes I did say that. Unfortunately, I still have to work to do which means that no, I can't spend all day long on SoSuave.

oh so wait a minute, you have enough time to post an average of 2.34 posts per day, but yet cant seem to find the time to google polls? hmmm, okay, so wheres your credibility?

 

[joekerr31]

i dont have time to read through the 50 million posts on this thread. although i read throught he first 2 pages.

at least in those replies everyone missed the friggin obvious!

CA isn't that hot, but she's still attractive enough that with her fame she could easily be banging a MUCH hotter dude.

so why this guy?

99.999% guarantee that this guy has social proof. i guarantee you that as a result of his job, money, or whatever he's got access to plenty of hot babes who are more than happy to suck his d*ck for a chance at being famous.

that social proof then sky rockets his value and women can actually go from seeing him as 'fugly' to 'a catch'. more over, if he befriended her on top of all that she's all the more likely to be wearing beer goggles.

but trust me, this dude had plenty of other hot chics interested in him and that's why CA was able to delude herself that he was a catch.

give it a year or two and they'll be divorced though after she gets tired of banging some 120lbs pasty white guy.

the other explanation is that CA is a lesbo and this guy is just a cover to appear heterosexual.

 

[God_of_getting_layed]

First of all, :crackup: at your first statement. Second of all, I've already told you this at least three times. You claim to be a GOD of getting laid by your declaration that you "bang plenty of hotties that most men will never know what its like to be with". You claim that no women will be with a guy unless she considers him good-looking. Now if "plenty of hotties" consider you good-looking, then you will have NO problem posting your HotOrNot pic.

oh so your taunting me into using myself as evidence for my own argument huh. well, too bad what I actually look like/hotornot score is considered personal information, and will not be given out on a message board. I really could care less if you think Im telling lies about the kind of women I get and my attractiveness. OH well....

I dont need to use myself as evidence for my argument, theres plenty of evidence for my arguement as is

Yes. If your screen name and the quality of women you sleep with had nothing to do with your insistence that looks matter, then those factors would be independent of your "theory".

A factor is independant of a theory if learning about the factor provides zero information about the actual truth of the theory. This is the case for my screen name, learning if its fraudulent or not will tell us nothing about the truth of the theory I preach. Understand?

Correct. If you puss out on sending me your pic, then there will be no screenshot of my HotOrNot score provided.

correct, AND the currently available evidence will remain against you being an 8+ untill you take action to provide additional new evidence; you know what this will consist of. But I like things how they are now

Your judgment also dictates that police officers deserve to die for enforcing the law.

My beleifs about police and law enforcement are irrelevant for this discussion. Again, another example of a factor that is independant of the truth about the theory that I preach on looks mattering.

But dont get off topic please, remember that one current piece of available evidence is the statistical fact that most men are NOT hot. This means current evidence says its unlikely that your an 8+.

Lets not also forget that it is now "later this week", so where are my polls you Looks DONT matterist? How about representing your side instead of damaging its evidence providing credibility any further?

 

[bigjohnson]

Can't we just all agree that looks are not the the only thing, that other factors matter right along with looks? Watching you two spar is disturbing; don't get me wrong as I believe you're both probably great guys but in logic and reasoning it's like a Special Olympics is going on here. No one is winning, really, and the contest is slow and not pretty.

 

[God_of_getting_layed]

Can't we just all agree that looks are not the the only thing, that other factors matter right along with looks? Watching you two spar is disturbing; don't get me wrong as I believe you're both probably great guys but in logic and reasoning it's like a Special Olympics is going on here. No one is winning, really, and the contest is slow and not pretty.

Um, I agree that looks arent the only thing that matters. Personality matters too. But it seems almost everyone agrees personality matters, so why discuss the obvious and established? Its the 'looks mattering' part that seems to be controversial. A lot of fools beleive your looks are negligable, Im here to set them straight as well as exposing the truth that looks do matter. SO I only discuss the looks mattering part in my threads, this is the part people cant seem to grasp despite all credible evidence.

 

[God_of_getting_layed]

Puѕѕy. Don't defend yourself when I laugh at your bullѕhit claims about bagging women most men only dream about, then.

either beleive me or DONT beleive me.

ITS YOUR CHOICE

Perfectly. You need me to draw you a picture to get you to see the relationship to being a God_of_getting_layed and your looks-matter rhetoric, since words obviously aren't working. I'll whip one up for you on MS Paint sometime.

well, if you understand me, then youll have to agree that there is no relationship between my theory and my status as a god of getting layed. So then dont bother using MS paint, you wont be able to paint a picture of such a relationship, becuase it doesnt exist. okay?

In looks-matter minds, yes. Clear-thinking people understand that there is no relationship to being a WBAFC and one's looks.

the current evidence is the fact that most guys areny 8+, so its unlikely that your an 8+. This UNliklihood is why its against you untill you provide further evidence otherwise.

And no where did I say that your WBAFC was evidence that youre ugly. Thats not the evidence I speak of.

WRONG. You began talking about your "judgment" in reference to this debate. In order to establish a frame of reference for this "judgment" of yours, it's necessary to put it into context. We need to understand that the same person that is making judgments about looks mattering is the same person that believes that there should be a congressional order to revoke the ability of police officers to pursue criminals.

no, my beleifs about police are irrelevant for this discussion just as my releigous beleifs are. To know weither my theory is true, you dont look at my other beleifs, you look at my theory and see how well it fits WITH ALL AVAILABLE AND RELEVENT EVIDENCE. If your logical and atleast average intelligent, youll see it fits very well with ALL evidence, much better than a "looks dont matter to women" kind of theory. Your kind seems to have a problem fitting your theory to ALL evidence, thats why you cherry pick evidence, which is an anti-scientific thing to do. DO I REALLY NEED TO GET BACK TO HOW UNSCIENTIFIC YOU AND YOUR KIND ARE DEUS?

This is true. We agree on something. However, this statistic is irrelevant because of the facts at hand.

um, no its not. It is relevent. Its about as relevent as the statistic that says you have a .00000000000000000001 probability of having Disease A despite the fact that a disease test you took (evidence) came up positive for disease A; which is a 99% accurate test. basically, since its soo rare that youll have such a disease, we must conclude you got a false positive on the test, because thats more likely than truly having the extremely rare disease. See how prior probabilities are still relevent even after additional evidence arrives? good

Looks are the only thing that matters!!

My reason for making this thread has already been explained (I even explain so in that very thread). Even when I made that thread, I beleived other things matter in addition to looks I still beleive this.

 

[ChrizZ]

This is what would happen if Deus and God_of_getting_layed met in real life!:cheer:

 

[God_of_getting_layed]

bump, your turn deus

 

[mpimpin]

This has turned into just another argument over the looks matters threads. Getting a bit off topic. I'm doing this for Deus's benefit as well as God of Getting laid's. How bout we lay off disproving each other and go sarge. Thread Closed