B
BeDJ
Guest
This thread reveals the closet white knights and if they do their due diligence, women will love them for who they are.
Never thought I'd ever white knighted chicks, but if master DJs tell me I do I guess I do..You learn something new here everyday.BeginningDJ said:This thread reveals the closet white knights and if they do their due diligence, women will love them for who they are.
And there it is....BeginningDJ said:This thread reveals the closet white knights and if they do their due diligence, women will love them for who they are.
Whatever dude. Its obvious you have a real hard-on for me since you feel the need to insult me constantly (when I have done and said nothing to provoke these attacks).djjizzyjeff said:I'll do that. Thanks for your assitance KJ. LMAO
While you're spewing your thinly veiled sheild of text script to protect your butthurt while living in your basement I'm real life with chicks that you'd cry in a corner before even trying to open your mouth. Good day.
PlayHer Man said:Whatever dude. Its obvious you have a real hard-on for me since you feel the need to insult me constantly (when I have done and said nothing to provoke these attacks).
Sensitive 18-year old beta faggots like you don't pull hotties. At best you pull a HB6 (when you're not sucking c0cks :crackup
So go find your HB6 dream girl (or dream guy) and stop crying about the men who "don't believe in love" d!ck face.
This is true.djjizzyjeff said:There seems to be a common theme of fear mongering in the seduction community where it's like a "fact" that all or even most women will cheat on you.
That's nonsense. Not all chicks will cheat on you if you find the right one. If you are going for more or the most chicks to prove something to yourself or others the less you'll focus on finding the best chick for you (if you are truly interested in that.)
Most will act like they have each others backs and complain about "betas" yet the same "one for all and all for one" cult would gladly see themselves finish first before you.
If you look for the right chick for you, you might be completely surprised that that same chick would have your back more than ANY DJ can claim they would.
You really don't think the community that preaches all chicks will cheat on you "spin the most plates" etc. if they found the right chick for them would really give a crap if you found the right chick for you do you? Perhaps less than a handful.
Don't forget that.
That's the "hypergamy" talk. While there is such a thing that someone can leave a partner for a better partner, giving it a scientific-sounding name doesn't make it ever-present.BeginningDJ said:Do you consider it cheating if your GF meets a guy, dumps you and fvcks him?
Women DO NOT want to abandon the comforts of their current relationship until they have found someone else. Once they do, YOU are disposable.
Taken women have still have plenty of options. They will dump you if they find an upgrade because they aren't wired for loyalty, honor and for better or worse.
Understand that relationships have a shelf life and that men usually come out emotionally and mentally worse off than women.
It is thrown out to shut down debate, it seems.plate's_empty said:And there it is....
Would you care to explain further BeginningDJ? Always curious to hear the reasoning for the White Knight card being thrown out.
Marriage is unnatural. Avoid it like the plague.PeasantPlayer said:Maybe humans were never meant to get married or be in relationships.....jesus
I do not consider myself a "white knight", but of course women love me for who I am. What, are they going to love me for who I'm not? Of course, I don't go around with a fake Mystery PUA persona, so that makes it easier. Since I'm pretty much honest and upfront about who I am, at least any interest that I generate is genuine.BeginningDJ said:This thread reveals the closet white knights and if they do their due diligence, women will love them for who they are.
Agreed. I have always been bothered by the so called view of reality here that PUA types swear is all true, because when I look at the real world, I find it simply does not match. A lot of it is just bitterness, inexperience, and venting frustrations.Wolfgang D said:It is worth keeping in mind that most of those who visit seduction forums are those who are not successful in dating and relationships. Naturally they will be bitter, and with all the feminist laws today, it is easy to fall for the temptation to view women as The Enemy.
There will also be the few total freaks who normal people stay far away from in real life. Few but loud. Their lack of social lives gives them more time to spend online.
So the worldview we hear is skewered.
Very true. This is something I notice a lot on this forum lately. I call this "male shaming". If you don't agree with their viewpoints, they will try to shame you by using words like "white knight" or more recently "beta faggot". They just want you to shut up, and discourage real discussion.Wolfgang D said:It is thrown out to shut down debate, it seems.
Funny, I have been called hateful toward women and a misogynist so many times in other forums and in real life, for pointing out scientific facts about differences between the sexes. And for opposing feminists with facts and statistics. Back in high school, and also at the university, my grades were hurt by this in some classes and I made enemies among certain other students, while those who agreed with me were afraid to speak up. Yet here I run the risk of being called a "white knight" or similar if I say that women can be loyal in a relationship.
The guy in this link is a clown.HalfPUAHalfAFC said:When I clicked on the link below, it said it was posted 39 minutes ago...
http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1h7hrn/seducing_a_woman_with_a_bf_quick_pointers/
Truth.Wolfgang D said:It is thrown out to shut down debate, it seems.
Funny, I have been called hateful toward women and a misogynist so many times in other forums and in real life, for pointing out scientific facts about differences between the sexes. And for opposing feminists with facts and statistics. Back in high school, and also at the university, my grades were hurt by this in some classes and I made enemies among certain other students, while those who agreed with me were afraid to speak up. Yet here I run the risk of being called a "white knight" or similar if I say that women can be loyal in a relationship.
The reason I said that is because my last girlfriend who was in her 30's... when it came to sexual partners in her life I was her #6. She was BPD, but did like to talk about her life, and what she'd been through. She also did like to ask a lot of questions. This was one of the reasons I stayed with her, even after all the red flags. At the time, I felt she was being open and honest with me, which she was, but I felt it was because of me, I was someone special to her. Yes, she did suck me in, and it did....suck. She also told me about all of her relationships. And, what I pieced together, through countless conversations, is that she cheated on all of her LTR's.... either with the next guy she was going to be in an LTR with or with a previous one. She was in her 6th LTR, with me, and she had cheated on all of her previous ones, including a long term marriage.PairPlusRoyalFlush said:you must not have much experience with these demons.
That sucks that you have been cheated on, it really does. In my experience, which is vast, most women are not cheaters. Maybe my blinders have been up but I'm very perceptive and can read people very well. Maybe I have a different screening process that you do, I don't know. I will tell you this though, as far as experience, mine is up there.....it is.PairPlusRoyalFlush said:Like I said, you are lacking in experience. Just because non-slvta cheat too does not mean slvts won't cheat, on the contrary. Slvts are fooked in the head(which is why they are slvuts to begin with). If your point is that you shouldn't assume someone is a quality girl just because they aren't a slvt though then you are correct. I've been cheated on by all types. Of course take the # they give you with a grain of salt, particularly a known BPD.
Hmmmm....what?Halcyonique said:Neither are men. ("Honor" though? Lol...)
Biologically, actually men are less wired for monogamy than women, because men can impregnate many women with relative ease, whilst women rely on the man remaining faithful to her for long enough to cater for offspring during and after her pregnancy.
It's just the way our evolution has worked, and men and women have marched in lockstep where that is concerned.
Oh, now it makes sense.Halcyonique said:I sure am a woman.
If thats how you feel, wouldnt our male opinion of the opposite sex's behavior be invalid?Johnny_Kage said:Hmmmm....what?
Oh, now it makes sense.
Invalid opinion. Nothing to see here.
Feel better now bro?djjizzyjeff said:I insult you because you're nothing more than a KJing clown. Clown. You replied to me in a thread I posted. Foolio.
Playswithimselfman = The poor mans cheap imitation Burroughs.
Nice try son. But you aren't grown enough to fill your Daddy's shoes. Good day.