Can you be both the Alpha Fuk and Beta Buck?

[Guy69JackBlue]

If you're Alpha Fux you have abundance, so there's little incentive to invest in one woman. Alpha fux could be providers, but it would make no sense for them because of their options. It would be like eating the same meal every day, when you have a selection of millions of different delicious meals.

Beta bux invest and provide for women because of their scarcity and lack of options. Paying for pvssy and affection is their only option.

Ok but actually the best way to fvck the most (and hottest) girls is to pay for it. I don't mean pay a girl in the context of a relationship.

I'm on another forum where guys talk about escorts in countries all over the world. Some of those guys are fat and ugly and have an infinite supply of HB8+ to fvck. They can afford it, so it's not costing them any quality of life.

Despite all the bragging here, I don't think anyone can say that they do that for free.

 

[Velasco]

Some of those guys are fat and ugly and have an infinite supply of HB8+ to fvck

Who will never love them. Why your not happy despite getting what you want.

 

[metalwater]

Ok but actually the best way to fvck the most (and hottest) girls is to pay for it. I don't mean pay a girl in the context of a relationship.

I'm on another forum where guys talk about escorts in countries all over the world. Some of those guys are fat and ugly and have an infinite supply of HB8+ to fvck. They can afford it, so it's not costing them any quality of life.

haveing that ability makes it more difficult to ever learn the other ways. the girls in those places are generally easier because the escorts are cheaper and more available making the entire landscape more even. but still, they are the same.

 

[Guy69JackBlue]

Who will never love them. Why your not happy despite getting what you want.

The guys don't love the girls either.

 

[Guy69JackBlue]

On top of that, you're getting "transactional sex" from women who don't truly desire you. The sex is different. It's more mechanical. A woman who is truly attracted to you and wants your validation gives you genuine, desire-filled sex that is far more satisfying. The difference between these 2 types of sex is stark if you've experienced both.

Not much of a difference between the two. Depends on the individual girl. And "free sex" is not always free, either.

Paying a little cash can allow you to keep your freedom. And there are many escorts who are good at what they do and provide a good service and don't just lay like a dead fish. It's mostly dependent on the individual girl, and not on whether cash was exchanged.

 

[SirBigBell]

Paying for sex is transactional sex, and obviously you could bang most women in the world doing this. But is it practical? It would certainly be extremely expensive.

On top of that, you're getting "transactional sex" from women who don't truly desire you. The sex is different. It's more mechanical. A woman who is truly attracted to you and wants your validation gives you genuine, desire-filled sex that is far more satisfying. The difference between these 2 types of sex is stark if you've experienced both.

When interaction even with the most beautiful woman in the world starts with her telling you “lets get the business end out of the way first” (referring to you paying her upfront) you know you’re foraging in the gutter and need to quickly get a grip of your life. Where is the joy in fvcking a beautiful woman who is hoping you nut quickly so she can get to the next client?

Each to their own; escorts are never an option for me

 

[RickPound]

Not much of a difference between the two. Depends on the individual girl. And "free sex" is not always free, either.

Paying a little cash can allow you to keep your freedom. And there are many escorts who are good at what they do and provide a good service and don't just lay like a dead fish. It's mostly dependent on the individual girl, and not on whether cash was exchanged.

So are you saying paying for all sex in solves a problem? In some way it takes you out of the “rigged” game?
How fulfilling is life?

 

[Velasco]

Think it's about an individual doing what he likes. If he feels joy, by all means he should pursue it. I'm guilty of making fun of guys who resort to paying escorts to fulfill their sexual needs. Different strokes for different folks.

 

[Guy69JackBlue]

Think it's about an individual doing what he likes. If he feels joy, by all means he should pursue it. I'm guilty of making fun of guys who resort to paying escorts to fulfill their sexual needs. Different strokes for different folks.

And I can guarantee I've fvcked way hotter girls than you have. In fact, I doubt you've ever been with a girl I would look twice at.

 

[Guy69JackBlue]

So are you saying paying for all sex in solves a problem? In some way it takes you out of the “rigged” game?
How fulfilling is life?

I don't care to play games or to waste time. The only reason to interact with a female on a personal level is to get a nut off.

The only reason to get into any "relationship" type thing is if children are involved. Everything else is a waste of time.

 

[Guy69JackBlue]

You can fvck women who like you and still be free. Just don't LTR them.

Like I said, if you havent experienced sex with a woman who actually likes you then you won't understand what I'm writing about. Most betas have transactional sex, so validational sex is a mysterious concept for them.

Lol. Trying to talk down to me to keep your imaginary perch. Good luck.

I've had sex for free and it's no different. It's actually a liability having the girl around afterwards.

 

[Velasco]

And I can guarantee I've fvcked way hotter girls than you have. In fact, I doubt you've ever been with a girl I would look twice at.

Lol. I have pics but they're nudes. Can dm if you want?

 

[Guy69JackBlue]

The joke is actually on the guy who is paying because the woman doesn't actually like him. Banging women who don't like you is bad for your inner-game and soul.

I think you have no experience with the topic. Everyone knows it's a transaction. The guys don't "like" anything about the girl either other than they get a nut off.

 

[Guy69JackBlue]

Betas (like you) know it's a transaction because women don't genuinely desire them (you).

Paying for sex isn't Game. You can keep trying to promote your life of brothel creeping, but it's not impressing me.

Aww I'm sorry you're so insecure you have to resort to petty name calling.

I doubt you've ever been with a girl I'd be interested in at all. My standards for looks are extremely high due to how many I've been with. My standards for relationships are impossibly high because I don't feel they have anything to offer "for real" (other than sex).

Despite how many times girls claim how "smart" they are or how great their "conversation" is, this is false.

And who ever said I was trying to play a game? I'm such a "beta" that I'm self-employed with almost $2 million. I can tell you're an inexperienced kid just regurgitating the same stupid nonsense you hear from all the other wannabes

 

[RickPound]

Jeezuz, another thread hijacked into talking about banging hookers and who’s banged hotter women.

Surely some members would like to have an advanced conversation like the OP intended. No?

 

[Guy69JackBlue]

If you're paying for transactional sex (with your impossibly high standards), then of course it will appear that women have nothing to offer other than sex. You're fulfilling your own prophecy here.

Femininity is lovely. You will experience how lovely femininity actually is if you focus on seducing hot women who actually like you, rather than paying for mechanical sex with women who don't like you.

1. Stop trying to be Sigmund Freud.

2. You falsely assume that it's always mechanical.

3. The reality is that I'm too experienced to look for the stuff you claim. It is fake and only an inexperienced person would mention it.

 

[Guy69JackBlue]

The topic is about beta bucks. So guys here promoting paying for sex is entirely related. It's a transactional beta bucks mindset.

The question has already been answered anyway = if you're alpha fux then you don't need to be beta bux because you have abundance. Paying for sex comes from scarcity and an inability to seduce women with genuine desire.

No... Beta bux refers to giving ONE girl lots of money in the context of a relationship.

Paying attractive and inexpensive escorts is just a way to have fun and enjoy life.

I can't even begin to guess how many attractive girls I've been with. Whether it's paid or not is irrelevant, and in fact, these transactions are much more honest than most of the games talked about on this site.

 

[Guy69JackBlue]

The topic is about beta bucks. So guys here promoting paying for sex is entirely related. It's a transactional beta bucks mindset.

The question has already been answered anyway = if you're alpha fux then you don't need to be beta bux because you have abundance. Paying for sex comes from scarcity and an inability to seduce women with genuine desire.

You're also forgetting the fact that many/most females have absolutely horrible personalities (especially young and attractive ones), and so it's a way to not have to deal with that.

You're pedestalizing them

 

[metalwater]

You're also forgetting the fact that many/most females have absolutely horrible personalities (especially young and attractive ones), and so it's a way to not have to deal with that.

You're pedestalizing them

that is exactly the issue. if they desire the man the personality will be good.

 

[Velasco]

"Horrible"