Can women separate emotion from sex like men?

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

If you're talking about the nature of things, then actually, monogamy is not natural for men or women, but that's probably a topic for another thread.

It’s serial monogamy for both men and women, and polygamy is for men (although not for women) but by the time the children are raised, the two have likely already bonded with each other enough to stay with each other for longer.

 

[AJ84]

It’s serial monogamy for both men and women, and polygamy is for men (although not for women) but by the time the children are raised, the two have likely already bonded with each other enough to stay with each other for longer.

Polygamy is rare for women, but it actually does exist in remote areas around the world where there are less women then men or the culture is nomadic. The women will usually marry brothers. There's a YouTube clip of some woman who married five brothers or something. She looked a bit tired hahaha.

 

[NSX-R]

I was dating a chick like that recently. Made out with her in the first couple of hours we met . Hb7 .

She was very smart on spinning plates but damn she really had mental issues. I wanted to fck her but my gut was telling me not to . Everything seemed too easy.

Didn't do anything with her but remained friends. She has a bf since 5 months but i hang out with her all the time . When she sees some guy , she knows how to get approached by the guy she has targeted and get fcked by him or use him as a transport or as an investor for her needs . I can tell you , she feels nothing , neither about her bf that she's cheating neither with the guy that she gets fcked with or whatever . She's colder than most male players out there .

From time to time she uses some tricks to see if I'm attracted to her but thankfully my experience has taught me to not fall into these tricks. I have gained a lot of experience from her on how women react . She's a very useful subject to study about how women can take anything they want .

Only very smart manly males can deal with her . The answer is yes , women separate sex with emotion much easier than men.

 

[Dingo]

I don't think they can... They eventually catch feelings...

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

Polygamy is rare for women, but it actually does exist in remote areas around the world where there are less women then men or the culture is nomadic. The women will usually marry brothers. There's a YouTube clip of some woman who married five brothers or something. She looked a bit tired hahaha.

That’s polyamory. That is not natural. It only exists solely because it is needed for survival. I’m saying polygamy. I think polygamy is natural for men, but not for women. As in women aren’t okay knowing about it. But men are still wired to be able to be that way anyway.

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

I was dating a chick like that recently. Made out with her in the first couple of hours we met . Hb7 .

She was very smart on spinning plates but damn she really had mental issues. I wanted to fck her but my gut was telling me not to . Everything seemed too easy.

Didn't do anything with her but remained friends. She has a bf since 5 months but i hang out with her all the time . When she sees some guy , she knows how to get approached by the guy she has targeted and get fcked by him or use him as a transport or as an investor for her needs . I can tell you , she feels nothing , neither about her bf that she's cheating neither with the guy that she gets fcked with or whatever . She's colder than most male players out there .

From time to time she uses some tricks to see if I'm attracted to her but thankfully my experience has taught me to not fall into these tricks. I have gained a lot of experience from her on how women react . She's a very useful subject to study about how women can take anything they want .

Only very smart manly males can deal with her . The answer is yes , women separate sex with emotion much easier than men.

That’s clearly the exception and not the norm. I am talking about the norm. I’ve seen worse from men in different ways.

 

[zekko]

That’s clearly the exception and not the norm. I am talking about the norm

I agree that something like a woman marrying multiple men is very rare. But if something is an exception, does that really make it "unnatural"?

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

I agree that something like a woman marrying multiple men is very rare. But if something is an exception, does that really make it "unnatural"?

It’s about probability really. As far as I know, this has never really existed in history except in Pompeii or with the Etruscans really, and it never continued after that either. So I believe that it does make it unnatural.

 

[zekko]

It’s about probability really. As far as I know, this has never really existed in history except in Pompeii or with the Etruscans really, and it never continued after that either. So I believe that it does make it unnatural.

It's certainly very, very rare.

Here's a hot button example: Supposedly 10% of people are gay. Now does that mean that being gay is unnatural? Or does that mean that it is natural that 10% of people are gay?
Or maybe this is better: 2% of humans have red hair. Does that mean it is unnatural to have red hair?
If you're a 3% male like Corey Wayne likes to talk about (lol), does that mean it's unnatural to be a 3% male?

I've never agreed when posters have claimed that it is unnatural for males to be monogamist (speaking about serial monogamy specifically). I don't see how it can be unnatural when the vast majority of men in the country have been married (I would think that most of them would have been monogamous for at least a short time lol). Even if men have a tendency toward polyamory, I still don't see how that makes serial monogamy unnatural. Especially since pair bonding exists so that the man can help ensure that the children reach a viable age.

 

[Dingo]

And let's be honest...

Neither can us men.... Or else we wouldn't be here.

 

[RichardTheFrog]

If you're talking about the nature of things, then actually, monogamy is not natural for men or women, but that's probably a topic for another thread.

Tell me why monogamy isn't natural for females.

They don't go raping and pillaging like men, so what is their natural state?

 

[ohrein]

Tell me why monogamy isn't natural for females.

They don't go raping and pillaging like men, so what is their natural state?

Men spread seed, there's no need for monogamy when you can ensure your genetics pass on so easily. For women, it's quality over quantity. The best chance of the survival of her offspring necessitates the best genetics she can get, during ovulation. The only time at which monogamy is natural for women is if they are with the best genetic match they can attract, otherwise, monogamy is not a sound biological imperative strategy. Now, most people might jump to purely physicality in that case but humans have evolved intelligence as much as physicality. Anyway, hypergamy selects the highest possible mate during ovulation. Monogamy doesn't support that strategy, ergo, from a biological imperative, monogamy is not natural for females.

 

[RichardTheFrog]

Men spread seed, there's no need for monogamy when you can ensure your genetics pass on so easily. For women, it's quality over quantity. The best chance of the survival of her offspring necessitates the best genetics she can get, during ovulation. The only time at which monogamy is natural for women is if they are with the best genetic match they can attract, otherwise, monogamy is not a sound biological imperative strategy. Now, most people might jump to purely physicality in that case but humans have evolved intelligence as much as physicality. Anyway, hypergamy selects the highest possible mate during ovulation. Monogamy doesn't support that strategy, ergo, from a biological imperative, monogamy is not natural for females.

Okay but does it really make sense for them to spend their whole lives hoping they can attract that 1 in a million guy? Just so they can fantasize about him for a few days per month while they spend their life with a guy who is willing to commit to her and raise her children.

Plus, all of this is THEORY, which even if it's true, it doesn't hold up to the daily grind of day-to-day life. I don't think the average woman is so cold-blooded to betray a guy who voluntarily spends his whole life by her. I mean, unless the guy is just completely pathetic and retarded, which I think is quite rare.

 

[ohrein]

Okay but does it really make sense for them to spend their whole lives hoping they can attract that 1 in a million guy? Just so they can fantasize about him for a few days per month while they spend their life with a guy who is willing to commit to her and raise her children.

Plus, all of this is THEORY, which even if it's true, it doesn't hold up to the daily grind of day-to-day life. I don't think the average woman is so cold-blooded to betray a guy who voluntarily spends his whole life by her. I mean, unless the guy is just completely pathetic and retarded, which I think is quite rare.

It's month to month, not their whole life. Each month at peak ovulation, they're subconsciously looking to secure the best genetics they can. Can that be controlled with conscious thought? Many guys would say no, I say absolutely yes, depending on the woman. If a woman is happy with a guy and has a lot invested, she's not going to sacrifice it all. If she's unhappy though, you can be sure she'll be looking for something better.

It's theory in the same way evolution is a theory. The daily grind is absolutely influenced by the myriad of ways our subconscious influences us. No, women aren't cold-blooded. It's not an ethical argument. It's a question of subconscious drives and circumstance.

 

[Von]

It really depends on the context:

Drunken one night stand - she will probably forget his name the next day and not care.
Using some unattractive guy for money - she will go through the motions of sex but not be emotionally (or even physically) connected because she's just doing it for the money.
Revenge sex - sleeping with someone else's guy, or her ex's best buddy, no emotional cares there, just doing it to cause problems.
Conformity sex - everyone else is paired off doing it (think spring break) and she doesn't want to be left out so.....
Pity sex - she feels bad that he's so nice but all alone and and well, it's Christmas/his birthday/ the anniversary of his mother's death and he really has been so sweet so why not 'thank' him.
Dating that leads to sex and more dating - likely emotions will come into play if she likes the guy enough and he has tapped into whatever makes her click. This can happen quickly or slowly, depending on the girl and depending on what happens immediately after the sex.

Women forget the people they have "sex" with.

But they will always remember the man they loved who she slept with.

So girls might forget they even had a ONS.

But she will never forget her LTR/Date.

Remember... A girl number count is always multiplied by 3. A boy number count is always divided by 3.

So to OP: Yeah... Its possible... That's why there is a difference between "sex" and "love"

 

[lizardking82]

I get what you're saying for relationships but I'm afraid you're giving women too much credit around catching warm and fuzzy feelings and wanting to nest after sex. It really depends on the context.

The girl, pushed up against a bathroom wall at 2am in some bar with her pants down around her ankles isn't thinking of bonding or nesting, sorry to disappoint

The reptilian brain doesn't know she's in a bathroom having sex and doesn't wanna have kids. That layer of the brain is programmed to hump anything that moves and attracts you and everytime you have sex, it thinks you're making a kid LOL

 

[AJ84]

The reptilian brain doesn't know she's in a bathroom having sex and doesn't wanna have kids. That layer of the brain is programmed to hump anything that moves and attracts you and everytime you have sex, it thinks you're making a kid LOL

Now I have this image in my head of a guy f**king a Gecko.

 

[AJ84]

Do go on, amy jo, or is it Amanda Jane?

Hahaha you know it's true.

 

[BeExcellent]

Women can seperate sex and love. Historically women had to have this ability...especially if marauding bandits or enemy soldiers came through raping & pillaging a village.

Longer term/repeated exposure creates bonding over time in both genders.

Hook up culture is rife with women who use men for sex in a similar way that men do it. Its not a particularly new thing either. I used to see it/hear about it in the bar/nightclub business 20 years ago & still see it in the nightlife today.

Look at the free love (sex) 60's and the hook up 70's disco culture. Look at the debauchery that Ancient Rome descended into. This is nothing new.

Women can enjoy sex strictly for pleasure just as men can.

 

[NSX-R]

That’s clearly the exception and not the norm. I am talking about the norm. I’ve seen worse from men in different ways.

There are still many examples there .

Women who marry guys because they have millions in their bank accounts. These women care only for the paper and not for the poor guy .

Women from 3rd world countries looking to get a pasport in a different more developed country . They marry those poor guys by selling love, interest and sex only to become legal .

I don't know any guy out there trying to seduce a woman for these examples and if those men exist it's close to 0% . But women arw famous for such tricks .