Here's the deal: I get a lot of action, so I don't mess with women who have boyfriends/husbands. But then again, I am looking for quality rather than quantity, and most quality women of my age are not on the market. Should I change my policy?
Boyfriends
- Thread starter The Shoe
- Start date
Gro0ver
Senior Don Juan
No.
It sounds like you're looking for a quality girl who would make a good stable girlfriend (please correct me if i'm wrong). If a girl cheats on her boyfriend/husband with you, how could you then trust her?
It sounds like you're looking for a quality girl who would make a good stable girlfriend (please correct me if i'm wrong). If a girl cheats on her boyfriend/husband with you, how could you then trust her?
True and this is one reason why I havd avoided such situations in the past. But then again, some of the most stable relationships I know were ones that were plucked from disasterous relationships. I suppose if one did decide to pursue, infidelity and heartbreak are an increased risk.Gro0ver said:
All is fair.
scrouds
Master Don Juan
I try not to speak too much about quality, because what men define as quality in women isn't always "static". Her behavior, honor as we would call it, will change depending on the situation and the man and what hormones her body is releasing that week.
That being said, I have no problem going after "taken" women. We have an innate need to have our women be loyal to us. Its a biological imperative designed to try and keep our offspring to ours and not another man's seed. Because of that, I don't think a woman's branch swinging should be considered a bad mark upon a woman.
Rather it is up to the man to dominate the mind and emotions of this target(s), impose your will and set for her boundaries that she shall only cross at her peril. Because of that, I see a "quality" woman is one that will fully accept your leadership and your rules.
I reject the premise of "once a cheater always a cheater" for women. I think cheating depends on the man, the relationship, and other external conditions including the friends she keeps, society's rules and enviroment, and how slutty she is.
Slutty is different then cheating. She could be a raging slut that doesn't get into relationships. She's still not good to date.
She can be a branch swinger. Maybe she cheats for a short period between branches, but usually she ends the old relationship shortly.
Or she can be following the biological imperative of both finding a provider and alpha seed. If she finds both in one person, will she cheat on that person?
That being said, I have no problem going after "taken" women. We have an innate need to have our women be loyal to us. Its a biological imperative designed to try and keep our offspring to ours and not another man's seed. Because of that, I don't think a woman's branch swinging should be considered a bad mark upon a woman.
Rather it is up to the man to dominate the mind and emotions of this target(s), impose your will and set for her boundaries that she shall only cross at her peril. Because of that, I see a "quality" woman is one that will fully accept your leadership and your rules.
I reject the premise of "once a cheater always a cheater" for women. I think cheating depends on the man, the relationship, and other external conditions including the friends she keeps, society's rules and enviroment, and how slutty she is.
Slutty is different then cheating. She could be a raging slut that doesn't get into relationships. She's still not good to date.
She can be a branch swinger. Maybe she cheats for a short period between branches, but usually she ends the old relationship shortly.
Or she can be following the biological imperative of both finding a provider and alpha seed. If she finds both in one person, will she cheat on that person?
( . )( . )
Banned
Scrouds knows his sh!t, couldn't have said it better.
My personal code is to be against cheating and I won't do it when I'm in a committed relationship after having made that mistake in a prior marriage. With that said, I have gone after women before who were married/in a relationship and swore that off as well, but just bagged a very sexually aggressive girl who has a boyfriend. I guess it depends on the situation.