I have driven plenty of BMWs and know ALOT of people that have them. Far superior I think not...they have too many issues to be that. Granted Porsche has their share but there is a certain feeling that you get when driving a Boxster with the top down that can't be matched.The Juan and only said:
yes I understand there may be technical issues to look at, and I'm not going to pretend I know anything about cars, BUT..we must also consider the aesthetic side of things; the BMW looks nicer, no doubt about.blinkwatt said:
Don't take this personally.....Are you blind?The Juan and only said:
That doesn't mean they wouldn't also praise the BMW, if you owned one.blinkwatt said:
It doesn't matter how good-looking you are, how romantic you are, how funny you are... or anything else. If she doesn't have something INVESTED in you and the relationship, preferably quite a LOT invested, she'll dump you, without even the slightest hesitation, as soon as someone a little more "interesting" comes along.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
To each his ownKrassus said:Almost bought a GST when i was 19. Glad i didn't. 350Z > DSM
I'm glad I invested my time and money into my DSM. I can toy with just about any car out there, most memorable a heavily modified $70k + Corvette Z06. Ferrari's, Porches, Lamborghinis....childs play The roadster concept is that the car should be low slung, have a long bonet, stubby tail and the rear wheels are right behind the drivers seat. It gives a unique driving experience where the car appears to pivot around you. Its the look and feel in place of practicality and everyday usability. My choice would be the Z4, the boxster is for people who cant afford a proper 911BingoBango said:
Dream car is a 911turbo though...*sigh* one day!I bet this is from someone who hasn't driven both the 911 or Boxster. They are two completely different breeds of cars. By the way in case any of you are wondering,Boxsters do beat out 911s at autocrosses.xBoost said:the boxster is for people who cant afford a proper 911
I wouldn't say it was that simple. If you spell M out completely it reads: "frustrated middle-management sales tool" car, which equals out with "angry divorcee with a great lawyer" so far as I can tell. In any case, the Boxter has it's engine in the right end of the car, and is a better balanced machine... not to mention that it comes from a company that has somehat of a soul (well... if you ignore that Cayene thing, that is...S1NN3R said:
)Funny you say that, but I'd say the Boxter (or, moreover, Cayman) platfrom is more "proper", and the aging 911 simply more powerful and better equipped so far as performance pieces go. The Boxter S will put in the same lap times as a Carrera 4 after all for $20+k less. They should just do a 400 bhp, GT3-esque spec car on the Cayman underpinnings and kill the big ol' rear-engined 911 for good... and I'd take a GT3-RS over a standard (non GT2) Turbo ANY day of the week.xBoost said:The roadster concept is that the car should be low slung, have a long bonet, stubby tail and the rear wheels are right behind the drivers seat. It gives a unique driving experience where the car appears to pivot around you. Its the look and feel in place of practicality and everyday usability. My choice would be the Z4, the boxster is for people who cant afford a proper 911
