HaleyBaron
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2021
- Messages
- 2,465
- Reaction score
- 2,098
I've seen enough young men who say things like:I noticed this. Alot of young men, 25 and younger sound (mannerism and vocabulary) like women. Its like 2pm on a Saturday afternoon at the hair salon. I even hear young and older dudes smacking their gums like women. I hear men and women well out of their teens using slang words tying to sound young and hip. It would be the equivalent to men in the 90s and early 2000s talking like valley girls.
I feel bad for the young men coming up, their are no places left for masculinity to be properly expressed.
Good. Less competition for us hahaI noticed this. Alot of young men, 25 and younger sound (mannerism and vocabulary) like women. Its like 2pm on a Saturday afternoon at the hair salon. I even hear young and older dudes smacking their gums like women. I hear men and women well out of their teens using slang words tying to sound young and hip. It would be the equivalent to men in the 90s and early 2000s talking like valley girls.
I feel bad for the young men coming up, their are no places left for masculinity to be properly expressed.
Don't always be the one putting yourself out for her. Don't always be the one putting all the effort and work into the relationship. Let her, and expect her, to treat you as well as you treat her, and to improve the quality of your life.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
Would you mind giving me an example? I know what you mean when it comes to mannerisms, like vocal fry and just acting like a queer is what sets most of them apart. As for the vocabulary I'm not so sure.(mannerism and vocabulary) like women
Using lots of female verbal tactics such as shifting of blames, taking no responsibility, making the guy out as if he's in the wrong [despite being men themselves]. This is the surface level stuff. In the comments above, you can see huge examples. Everything the guys are saying is something a woman says. It feels almost self depreciating of their own respect.Would you mind giving me an example? I know what you mean when it comes to mannerisms, like vocal fry and just acting like a queer is what sets most of them apart. As for the vocabulary I'm not so sure.
No disrespect, but your use of the word "toxic" is also female born from feminine energy getting into the gaming scene. In those days, it wasn't called "toxic." It was called bantering and arguing.@HaleyBaron So just manipulation? Yeah, things have progressed pretty far south when it comes to that, in school and the workplace. Even when you're in the right, there's a flock of both guys and girls ready there to socially shame you into silence. Sh*t's insane. I remember logging into a match of CSGO 2 years ago, and after having said some critique about a female team player all the guys were on top of of me ready to white knight and simp for this chick they've never even seen. Online FPS lobbies used to be the most toxic communities out there, which is just crazy to see how far things have gone in the other direction.
Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
Simps gonna simp.These guys are just simps, nothing new
"Locking them down"Here's the the thing - it's mostly the simps that are banging these chicks. You can look down on them all you want, and criticize white knighting, but these are the guys that are getting relationships with these women and locking them down.
That kind of life would drain the hell out of me. I already choose to not have a girlfriend cause I don't want to deal with that kind of thing again. I could get one now and ride through ignoring the bs, but I could also just keep having multiple girls and filtering out all the ones who try to play games with me. Those guys above unfortunately are too pussified to break out of their own cycle of self depreciation, and it makes me more disappointed to them rather than angry."Locking them down"
Sure, if you want to be their Plan B (or in reality, C, D, etc.) and experience a relationship full of constant frame wars, manipulation, and emotional blackmail, by all means employ every blue pill tactic you can to "lock down" these women.
There is more to life than locking down a woman for sex once a month by selling yourself out and having no self-respect. Your insinuation that this is somehow a good thing and that we got it all wrong is very misplaced IMO.
What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.
You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
I agree that it can be very difficult to maintain a healthy relationship over a long period of time. However, I am actually an LTR type guy if I find a high value woman. What I do not condone though is what Great Owl was seeming to say - that being a white knight/blue pill guy is somehow a good thing if it helps you "lock down" women. The long term implications of being that way are almost purely negative and will leave you miserable in an LTR for the reasons I described. Simply not worth it.That kind of life would drain the hell out of me. I already choose to not have a girlfriend cause I don't want to deal with that kind of thing again. I could get one now and ride through ignoring the bs, but I could also just keep having multiple girls and filtering out all the ones who try to play games with me. Those guys above unfortunately are too pussified to break out of their own cycle of self depreciation, and it makes me more disappointed to them rather than angry.
I actually looked up the meaning of the word feminist and it just says that someone who believes in equal rights for women. So I say I'm a feminist. But I also say the movement is majority extremists and they try to make double standards of everything etc. It's actually easier to have a conversation about that type of thing. And they don't by default think you 'hate women'.I agree that it can be very difficult to maintain a healthy relationship over a long period of time. However, I am actually an LTR type guy if I find a high value woman. What I do not condone though is what Great Owl was seeming to say - that being a white knight/blue pill guy is somehow a good thing if it helps you "lock down" women. The long term implications of being that way are almost purely negative and will leave you miserable in an LTR for the reasons I described. Simply not worth it.
And I agree with you - pvssy is not the be all end all and we as men need to realize that. But, it is very easy to have that mindset when you have it. When you are a blue-pilled simp who never gets any, it is much harder to have that mindset.
Things like, "I felt some bad energy" or the example OP provided, gossiping and complaining about what another man does behind closed doors with women.Would you mind giving me an example? I know what you mean when it comes to mannerisms, like vocal fry and just acting like a queer is what sets most of them apart. As for the vocabulary I'm not so sure.
Who's Tony Baker, and why should I care?