Poon King said:
You missed the entire point of the post.
No I did not, I just partially disagree.
Poon King said:
In this world change is a constant. Therefore, getting "comfortable" means you will be unprepared for change. It means you only have the tools to meet the challenges of TODAY as they are today.
Change is constant, true. Getting comfortable means being unprepared, untrue. Having the tools to meet the challenges of today is exactly what being prepared for unpredictable changes means. I wouldn't know it in the past since I didn't predict it, but that's not an issue because I have the tools to deal with it when the problem appears.
Poon King said:
The man who never gets comfortable and never CLINGS to outside things or outside situations (jobs, women, consumer goods, etc.) for happiness is the strong man. The alpha man. He is not living in constant misery. He is just always looking for improvement and new opportunities to IMPROVE his situation. He is also not clinging to anything because he is self-contained. Only the faggot beta clings to things.. because the faggot beta always feels incomplete.
I clearly stated that if I knew quitting my job, selling my house and marrying a stray dog would make me happy I would do it. It means I would let go of my job, let go of my house and I wouldn't mind breaking up with my girlfriend if I didn't feel happy with it and I had no other way to change it for the better.
I keep (not cling) to what I like and let go of what I don't like. If I was unaffected by anything around me I wouldn't know what I liked or not.
I change my outside situation because it's uncomfortable in order to make it comfortable. It's dumb to make myself feel uncomfortable just to change my situation if I'm comfortable with it in the first place. It seems you're stressing yourself to not feel comfortable so there's constant change and constant stress which makes you uncomfortable, I dunno about you but I call that a downward cycle. How can you feel happy if you're constantly uncomfortable regardless of external circumstances? It sounds like a psychological issue to me. So my question to you is: When is it good enough and what would it take to make you happy?
Poon King said:
If you are still looking outside yourself for happiness (consumer goods, dogs, women, sex, etc.) then you missed the point completely.
Wake up men.
Apparently you need nothing to be happy and thus don't have any motivational force (emotion), but I don't believe that because you're human.
I responded to the point in the OP made that Donald Trump made and continues to make his fortune because he's never satisfied. Not satisfied = not comfortable = not happy. Unless he takes satisfaction in what he does rather than what he gains from it, this would mean that the assertion that Donald Trump is never satisfied is invalid. Rather it means he's satisfied when making more and dissatisfied when not making money or losing money, so the question is if Donald Trump would still be happy if he lost at what he's doing? I highly doubt it, most likely he would be motivated to reverse the trend.
Conclusion: Go make a fortune if that makes you happy or stop trying to get rich if it makes you unhappy. The latter looks like this:
http://40.media.tumblr.com/287e29bbe705c4fbd57fa44ab493a1d4/tumblr_nilpgsdIxK1qc6r6co1_1280.png
If getting money is your game then the situation in this picture would be solved by not chasing the money on the stick. Stop for some time to reflect, realize that you're doing it wrong (thus getting no money) and find the way that works (in this specific metaphor understanding that the stick is attached to you, so you just pull in the stick and the money comes to you).
Same goes for women. If you're chasing them, getting nowhere and it's making you feel unhappy then you're doing it wrong. So stop chasing, reflect upon what you can do (stick is attached to you) and find out how she will come to you. The result is that you get the woman without killing your happiness, that's a win-win.