Unlock the Secrets to Dating Success

New to the SoSuave forum? Start your journey to becoming a dating rockstar with our essential guide.

This comprehensive resource will give you the tools and strategies you need to overcome obstacles, build confidence, and attract the women you've always wanted.

Don't let another day go by without taking control of your dating life - start now and get ready to experience the success and fulfillment you deserve.

Thanks for visiting, and I look forward to your success!

article: Incels Are the Product of an Incomplete Sexual Revolution

DEEZEDBRAH

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 24, 2017
Messages
6,093
Reaction score
4,850
Age
34
From the article.........Progressivism's promise is to move toward social arrangements that increase the number of winners and diminish the number of losers.

It sounds like this was the author's proposed solution. It reminds me of "give every a kid a trophy" mentality that helped get us in the mess we are in. Not everybody is a winner. We have lifted all of the sanctions(slut shaming, single mom shaming, stay at home cook and make babies) that made it easy to get and keep women. It now requires men with better hunting skills and better weapons than it did years ago.

I'm all for survival of the fittest. Let nature weed out the losers and men who can't get what they want in life.
I watched Shark Tank where a millennial startee crying because his joke of a hobby doesn't get free money. Wimpering on TV because he sucks as a entrepreneurs. I blame low testosterone. Single mother victimhood. No father in sight and mommy coddled him. Its pathetic.

On a JRE podcast, there was open debate with peterson and rogan regarding sex, incels, and Chad. Peterson basically pedals equality of outcome if children. He then goes to war with it with resoect to the matxist, leftist, cucks. I concur, a society who has 10% getting all the females begs for a violent epidemic. In all domsins, there are winners and there are losers. Failure to compete is warranted with a participation trophy. This isn't real life.

I am all for Darwin, Survival of the fittest but not a one wsy flow. The preset is women at peak SMV skiing down cawk mountain till the wall then seeking beta msle cuck provider or daddy government to unleash the dogs of the state to extract male resources. For any male woke rather than asleep at the wheel, he pursues top form SMV 18-23. Women at the wall beta male shame cucks into raisin some other man's baby. Marry the *****s.

Not all things are equal regardless of the jargon pushed in society. If a woman leaves, you date younger but, women with the state hedge their bets. If a mannis stupid enough to marry, she can divorce rape ****ing him from future women.

I won't marry. I won't get condoms from a woman. I wont listen to lies about cannot have kids or on the pill. I lost count of accidentally on purpose pregnancy.

Darwin is fine. Fittest should survive but eith daddy government, beta thirst, there's no fix to a solution beyond not playing house.
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,845
Reaction score
3,757
MGTOW is not the answer although, I see value in 'purpose' rather than blindly following the female biological strategy nor bringing the state into my ltr given the 80% divorce Stat by women. Going monk mode is no solution unless you are asexual and you are seeking enlightenment.
Why are you assuming MGTOW is only monk-mode? Perhaps you should visit their site or learn the definition of the term. I can say that everything you've wrote in this post and the other post sounds like 100% hardcore MGTOW. By definition, everyone here who is not in a LTR or married or is sincerely looking for that because of the reasons you've put in (and arguably rightly so) is MGTOW.
 

MatureDJ

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
11,322
Reaction score
4,681
Why are you assuming MGTOW is only monk-mode? Perhaps you should visit their site or learn the definition of the term. I can say that everything you've wrote in this post and the other post sounds like 100% hardcore MGTOW. By definition, everyone here who is not in a LTR or married or is sincerely looking for that because of the reasons you've put in (and arguably rightly so) is MGTOW.
Uh, true MGTOW-ism *is* monk mode. Of course, there are a lot of MGTOWs who are TFLers in denial (i.e., True Forced Loneliness, aka Incel), as TFL prophet "Roller" Steve Hoca would say.
 
Last edited:

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,845
Reaction score
3,757
Uh, true MGTOW-ism *is* monk mode. Of course, there are a lot of MGTOWs who are TFLers in denial (i.e., True Forced Loneliness, aka Incel), as TFL prophet "Roller" Steve Hoca would say.
You didn't make up the term so you can't define it. That's not what their own website says its defined as. It sounds like you and others DJs are in denial that the lifestyle promoted by MGTOW is just re-packaged red-pill or red/black pill hybrid.
 
Top