article: Fewer Sex Partners Means a Happier Marriage

[Soflobro#3]

Deep down most women want to find a high quality man that loves them and wants to take care of them. The reality is that women will not find this, either because those guys just don't show interest or the women themselves self sabotage their dream relationships. Why do you think so many women go for deadbeat loser "bad boys" but overlook a stable man. Women that sleep with tons of dudes have issues.

Because stable responsible men follow the rules, do the right thing and are boring and beta. Not all of them, but most guys are.

 

[Von]

You idiots can't see propaganda when it is staring you in the face. These are right wing religious nut balls, who will do anything to stop people from having sex.

Strong Families.
Sustainable Societies.
The Institute for Family Studies (IFS) is dedicated to strengthening marriage and family life, and advancing the well-being of children through research and public education. Addressing family life is what we do, and we invite you to learn more about ways to strengthen families in America and around the world.

Man BibleBelt, your account got hack? These days you seems to be on a range.

Yeah, this forum is pretty ''right-wing/religious''....

But the graphic is right.

There is such a ''thing'' as ''too much''....

Man want to redo his sexual prowess of previous partners with current one. Woman want the emotional/personal attributes for her previous into the current

A) A woman will want in each of her man to reproduce all the things she liked in the previous man.
EX: She liked Man 1 size, She Liked Man 2 Ambitions, She Liked Man 3 Independance, She Like Man 4 tenacity... She wants Man 5 to have M1, M2,M3,M4

B) A man who has alot of sexual partners... He will want to have his GF/LTR/Current Woman to REPRODUCE THE SEX ACT he had with his previous partners.
Ex: Girl 1 did Anal, Girl 2 did Deep, Girl 3 did public stuff.... Man for Girl 4 he wants her to do G1,G2,G3

For Both male and female... with more count, we become less 'tolerant'' (screening becomes a instant nexting weapon... like people who got hurt on their ego too much who anything will be a next)

The flip side: There is such thing has TOO LITTLE

A) Girl ain't satisfied sexually... so she always wonders what is ''next/grass next door''... she will hold if she has values or love her partner more than herself.... or the current guy improves!

B) Man hasn't bang enough women in his life... he will always want to ''be adventurous'' since he doesn't know ''other woman''...

In both cases.... If you don't have experience, you likely always want more/try out more/become adventurous before settling down.... except you settled down before ... so you feel caught

There need to be a balance. This balance however is hard especially now that life starts older (before you were an adult at 18... now 25 you likely not even out of school or your parents basement).

Anyway new DATA for Statistic shows the longer you wait for marriage... the longer it will last

You can't affect the market... no point in finding something or someone to blame... The only variable you have is YOU (the girl you find are the mirror of your soul)

 

[Soflobro#3]

I'd stop at blaming women, cratered or not.

I've travelled a lot, in the past it could be as often as once a week that I'm on a plane to somewhere. Among those business trips, I find myself in Sweden. Great place, beautiful women, superb looking men - almost beautiful. I get those men hugs whenever I'm there - am still not used to it, kinda gay-ish 4 me.

But it's in this country that has me totally convinced that men has turned women into who they are today.

The men has become feminine-like. Going out with some male buddies for drinks is like waiting for a girl to dress up. It's that serious. Guesstimate 30 mins - 45 mins for a man to get ready as opposed to me who gets ready in less then 10 mins. They can b1tch like a girl too. The men's hair are simply immaculately done when I'm at the club, strolling down the streets, at their work places, everywhere. It doesn't just stop there, their character too is perhaps a reflection on how they groom themselves.

The women are more masculine. Yes they dress like women but act manly. Even those really young girls. Truck drivers, plumbers, mechanics, etc those traditional male jobs is being done by women in Sweden. I could go on but I think you get my meaning here.

I strongly believe that women WILL assume manly roles when the men in their immediate vicinity becomes feminine or simply incapable of being manly.

I strongly believe that because of mens failure women HAS no choice but to subconsciously pick up traits that's necessary for their society to survive.

Women will continue jumping from men to men in the hopes of finding that one man who can truly assume his god given nature. It's instinctively woven into women. No matter how they justify you are a good man, they'll be drawn towards others that's manly.

It's easy to blame women for everything.

But perhaps deeper down, we as men were the root cause of it and women were just picking up the slack.

In Sweden it's not the womens fault. It's the state and the propoganda. This is what happens when feminism is allowed to take over and have heavy influence. It's leftists taking over the educational institutions. Sweden is probably to far gone.

It would be relative if men raged for not having children and getting pregnant like Arnold in Junior. An abysmal film.

Honestly, let women walk off the cliff. Embrace the collapse of Western society. When SMV craters, I won't be holding up the Fort.

They're is nothing that can be done to stop it. The US school systems have only gotten worse since the 90s by a significant margin.

 

[Ranger]

Maybe feminism makes women unhappy

Damn soflobro. I agree with you again. Knock it off dude.

 

[Bible_Belt]

Man BibleBelt, your account got hack? These days you seems to be on a range.

Yeah, this forum is pretty ''right-wing/religious''....

But the graphic is right.

There is such a ''thing'' as ''too much''....

Man want to redo his sexual prowess of previous partners with current one. Woman want the emotional/personal attributes for her previous into the current

A) A woman will want in each of her man to reproduce all the things she liked in the previous man.
EX: She liked Man 1 size, She Liked Man 2 Ambitions, She Liked Man 3 Independance, She Like Man 4 tenacity... She wants Man 5 to have M1, M2,M3,M4

B) A man who has alot of sexual partners... He will want to have his GF/LTR/Current Woman to REPRODUCE THE SEX ACT he had with his previous partners.
Ex: Girl 1 did Anal, Girl 2 did Deep, Girl 3 did public stuff.... Man for Girl 4 he wants her to do G1,G2,G3

For Both male and female... with more count, we become less 'tolerant'' (screening becomes a instant nexting weapon... like people who got hurt on their ego too much who anything will be a next)

The flip side: There is such thing has TOO LITTLE

A) Girl ain't satisfied sexually... so she always wonders what is ''next/grass next door''... she will hold if she has values or love her partner more than herself.... or the current guy improves!

B) Man hasn't bang enough women in his life... he will always want to ''be adventurous'' since he doesn't know ''other woman''...

In both cases.... If you don't have experience, you likely always want more/try out more/become adventurous before settling down.... except you settled down before ... so you feel caught

There need to be a balance. This balance however is hard especially now that life starts older (before you were an adult at 18... now 25 you likely not even out of school or your parents basement).

Anyway new DATA for Statistic shows the longer you wait for marriage... the longer it will last

You can't affect the market... no point in finding something or someone to blame... The only variable you have is YOU (the girl you find are the mirror of your soul)

Do you understand checking the source of research before drawing conclusions from it? The place exists to crank out propaganda. The tobacco companies used to present research in court that suggested smoking was not unhealthy. They were the ones funding that research, of course. Science does not operate on a pre drawn conclusion, but propaganda does.

What's happening here on sosuave is that when you tell someone what they want to hear, the last thing they do is check the source. And that is where our society, at least the US, is headed, a complete inability to think critically. It is like the way our president can say any ridiculously untrue thing, but as long as it jives with his overall message of hate, his followers ask no questions.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Yes but what she's doing is better dealing the guys she's with. If someone comes along and offers what she perceives to be a better deal at the moment, the guy she's currently with is toast.

Again, a accurate portrayal of female entitlement and discontentment. A bulking season post wall woman bragged online about picking fights with her husband. Of course, she could lose a hundred pounds but that would require work.

Herein lies why marriage is retarded. TRP debunks slut tells. Tattoos, IG ass pics, attention *****, and a variety of other things that suggest a poor candidate with high kills.

While I don't agree with guys being able to sue other guys in court when their spouse/mate cheats with the other guy, I do see some value/pushback in society as we know that type of behavior is wrong. If you're going to allow women to drain men of their resources in court, at least he should have some type of means of striking back through the courts to sue any guy who helps aid in the dissolution of their relationship. If he wants to hop in bed with her while she is still with someone, there should be some punishment for one or both of them.

If anything is wrong, it's the blue pill idealism.

Marriage is retarded but, that bloke who wife's up a girl he got through teens and twenties is doing it right over 99% of men.

If fat, I next her. If lmr, next.

Once you live common law married or have kids, you are ****ed. Her cuckin is irrelevant

 

[Spaz]

Do you understand checking the source of research before drawing conclusions from it? The place exists to crank out propaganda. The tobacco companies used to present research in court that suggested smoking was not unhealthy. They were the ones funding that research, of course. Science does not operate on a pre drawn conclusion, but propaganda does.

What's happening here on sosuave is that when you tell someone what they want to hear, the last thing they do is check the source. And that is where our society, at least the US, is headed, a complete inability to think critically. It is like the way our president can say any ridiculously untrue thing, but as long as it jives with his overall message of hate, his followers ask no questions.

That's the extremist, a wholly uneducated bunch of men that for most part is not capable in life or has trouble making ends meet.

I doubt that someone who's made it in life or at least playing the game being that naive.

 

[highSpeed]

Man BibleBelt, your account got hack? These days you seems to be on a range.

Yeah, this forum is pretty ''right-wing/religious''....

But the graphic is right.

There is such a ''thing'' as ''too much''....

Man want to redo his sexual prowess of previous partners with current one. Woman want the emotional/personal attributes for her previous into the current

A) A woman will want in each of her man to reproduce all the things she liked in the previous man.
EX: She liked Man 1 size, She Liked Man 2 Ambitions, She Liked Man 3 Independance, She Like Man 4 tenacity... She wants Man 5 to have M1, M2,M3,M4

B) A man who has alot of sexual partners... He will want to have his GF/LTR/Current Woman to REPRODUCE THE SEX ACT he had with his previous partners.
Ex: Girl 1 did Anal, Girl 2 did Deep, Girl 3 did public stuff.... Man for Girl 4 he wants her to do G1,G2,G3

For Both male and female... with more count, we become less 'tolerant'' (screening becomes a instant nexting weapon... like people who got hurt on their ego too much who anything will be a next)

The flip side: There is such thing has TOO LITTLE

A) Girl ain't satisfied sexually... so she always wonders what is ''next/grass next door''... she will hold if she has values or love her partner more than herself.... or the current guy improves!

B) Man hasn't bang enough women in his life... he will always want to ''be adventurous'' since he doesn't know ''other woman''...

In both cases.... If you don't have experience, you likely always want more/try out more/become adventurous before settling down.... except you settled down before ... so you feel caught

There need to be a balance. This balance however is hard especially now that life starts older (before you were an adult at 18... now 25 you likely not even out of school or your parents basement).

Anyway new DATA for Statistic shows the longer you wait for marriage... the longer it will last

You can't affect the market... no point in finding something or someone to blame... The only variable you have is YOU (the girl you find are the mirror of your soul)

Look, familes are better with the relationship in tact. No family is better when the wife is on her 3rd marriage, with 5 kids to 3 different men. Yes, sex is awesome and I do think you can have a great sex life with a wife but it has to be something that is worked on by both parties. Right now, you've got a system in place that encourages bad behavior for women. If you knew for instance, that you could never show up at work and still get your paycheck, how many people do you think are going to show up at work? Some, maybe those that want to get ahead but the vast majority, you will likely only see them on paydays so they can pick up their check.

It's the same thing with marriage. Once the ring is on, you've got a couple of kids? That guy is exposed. Yep, maybe he has a decent pre-nup but most guys, they either got married when they had nothing and/or were still in the fantasy love world and simply didn't do it. Even with a pre-nup, you're still going to get taken to the cleaners to some degree. There is the rare guy who made out ok in divorce but that's just not the norm.

And that's why most women simply lay the blame and the responsibility for the relationship onto the guy. He has more skin in the game, he has more to lose, so it's easy for her to lay the responsibility off onto him. She can now put in nothing and get whatever she wants out of the relationship, which is little more than him being a pair of pants with a paycheck. Who is really going to desire and want to work on continuing to build the relationship when that's the case? She's got him over a barrel and she's supposed to give a sh*t about the state of the relationship? Most women are checked out by that point.

Sex? Companionship? Respect? Only a distant memory for him at that point. Gone are the times when they were dating when she hung on his every word and his johnson. Gone are the days when she bent over backwards and forwards for him. She has complete power over the relationship. She wants to walk out? No problem, she'll have the next guy lined up in a week. She wants him to do all the work to "save" the "relationship"? Why not, he has everything to lose, not her.

These types of organizations and statistics only work when both parties have responsibility in the relationship. You're two kids deep and now she has to put in half of the money and only gets the kids 50% of the time if the relationship/marriage fails? You mean she doesn't get alimony and half of his retirement? Now she has a reason to try and work it out, even if she doesn't like him all that much at the time. Responsibility people, that's the only way marriages and families work, but it has to be on both.

You can't have it both ways. You can't have a bunch of hoes who are going to lay down with someone within 4 dates and have quality women who are worth being in a serious LTR with. You can't have a bunch of different plates and have one that is going to be worth putting any sort of risk into.

 

[MatureDJ]

Look, familes are better with the relationship in tact. No family is better when the wife is on her 3rd marriage, with 5 kids to 3 different men. Yes, sex is awesome and I do think you can have a great sex life with a wife but it has to be something that is worked on by both parties. Right now, you've got a system in place that encourages bad behavior for women. If you knew for instance, that you could never show up at work and still get your paycheck, how many people do you think are going to show up at work? Some, maybe those that want to get ahead but the vast majority, you will likely only see them on paydays so they can pick up their check.

It's the same thing with marriage. Once the ring is on, you've got a couple of kids? That guy is exposed. Yep, maybe he has a decent pre-nup but most guys, they either got married when they had nothing and/or were still in the fantasy love world and simply didn't do it. Even with a pre-nup, you're still going to get taken to the cleaners to some degree. There is the rare guy who made out ok in divorce but that's just not the norm.

And that's why most women simply lay the blame and the responsibility for the relationship onto the guy. He has more skin in the game, he has more to lose, so it's easy for her to lay the responsibility off onto him. She can now put in nothing and get whatever she wants out of the relationship, which is little more than him being a pair of pants with a paycheck. Who is really going to desire and want to work on continuing to build the relationship when that's the case? She's got him over a barrel and she's supposed to give a sh*t about the state of the relationship? Most women are checked out by that point.

Sex? Companionship? Respect? Only a distant memory for him at that point. Gone are the times when they were dating when she hung on his every word and his johnson. Gone are the days when she bent over backwards and forwards for him. She has complete power over the relationship. She wants to walk out? No problem, she'll have the next guy lined up in a week. She wants him to do all the work to "save" the "relationship"? Why not, he has everything to lose, not her.

These types of organizations and statistics only work when both parties have responsibility in the relationship. You're two kids deep and now she has to put in half of the money and only gets the kids 50% of the time if the relationship/marriage fails? You mean she doesn't get alimony and half of his retirement? Now she has a reason to try and work it out, even if she doesn't like him all that much at the time. Responsibility people, that's the only way marriages and families work, but it has to be on both.

You can't have it both ways. You can't have a bunch of hoes who are going to lay down with someone within 4 dates and have quality women who are worth being in a serious LTR with. You can't have a bunch of different plates and have one that is going to be worth putting any sort of risk into.

POWERFUL BLACK PILL!

 

[Desdinova]

So the c0ck carousel makes women less likely to feel happy in their eventual marriage. Alpha widow effect?

Yes, it's the alpha widow effect. Women go through a transformation after they've been alpha-widowed. I'm watching two women I know go through it. One was supposed to get married to a guy she was with since she was 16, and one split from her husband who was her one and only partner. Both of them were highly appealing women before their partners fvcked off on them. Now they're both becoming pieces of 5hit right before my eyes.

Maybe feminism makes women unhappy

From what I've been seeing, feminism is adopted AFTER the woman becomes alpha-widowed. I haven't seen women who are still with their earliest love encounters turn into feminists. They have no reason to become one. Feminism is adopted after she's been alpha-widowed along with the c0ck carousel, multiple tattoos, and multiple pets.

 

[highSpeed]

POWERFUL BLACK PILL!

Look, I don't want to be nihilistic but you have to look at reality. I'm not saying you can't have fun and can't enjoy yourself with women but you have to be careful. I think you have to be smart, you have to think with the big head. Once you let the little head control the game, you're done. With modern society the way it is, 3rd wave feminism, the courts, the deck is stacked against marriage. You can still have fun though and if you do run into that rare situation, timing (you've already made your money), have a strong pre-nup and find a great woman, consider it but consider how you plan it very carefully.

Is it easier to score with women, get what you want and have a happy life if you look like a male model? Sure it is. There are plenty of guys that have an awesome adventure with a hell of a lot less though. Again, these are the guys that plan. Me, I've definitely made mistakes that have lessened my ability to have fun with women. Moving forward, my goal is to help some of the younger guys avoid those mistakes. My dad was a crappy role model and didn't make time to teach me or interact with me. It would have been great to have a strong male presence that showed me how to interact with women and be choosy. Make no mistake, even before the modern crap-fest with western women going on, there was women being women. Smart guys have always made good choices and therefore increased their satisfaction and happiness levels.

For men, a lot of your happiness in life is setting yourself up to have fun. Is life for men all about sex? No, there's career, interpersonal relationships, other stuff like that. But sex and women are a big part of that happiness. Yes, I know, make yourself happy before thinking about women but let's be honest, think about all the stuff that you enjoy. Now what at the top of that list in most cases? A great massage? A promotion at work? Running that elusive 4 minute mile? Building that hot rod? Making your parents proud? Starting that charity? Or a great piece of *ss? There truly is not much like a great piece of *ss.

Would I sacrifice my life over it? Hell no but boy I truly would walk a mile for a good quality vertical smile. The key is not letting it take over your life. The key is not getting wrapped up in the emotion of a relationship because women win the emotion game literally like 100% of the time.

 

[peanutbuttablunts]

"Alpha widow effect"? Don't get hung up on the post-modernist lingo. It's all very simple: the more relationships you have (both short and long-term), the more jaded you become and the less happy you are in those relationships. This applies to both women and men, though the effect is probably more pronounced on women as they tend to be more emotional than men, on average.

dont get hung up on the post modern lingo xD. you seem to think alpha widow effect is some post modern philosophical buzz word. hilarious. post modern language is actually extremely useful as a tool to understand the world that we live in. its beyond insane (dangerous, even) to walk through this world without having at least a mild understanding of the era of thought that you live in.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Look, familes are better with the relationship in tact. No family is better when the wife is on her 3rd marriage, with 5 kids to 3 different men. Yes, sex is awesome and I do think you can have a great sex life with a wife but it has to be something that is worked on by both parties. Right now, you've got a system in place that encourages bad behavior for women. If you knew for instance, that you could never show up at work and still get your paycheck, how many people do you think are going to show up at work? Some, maybe those that want to get ahead but the vast majority, you will likely only see them on paydays so they can pick up their check.

Agreed. But what marriage is and was aren't the same anymore.

"happy wife, happy life" is the doctrine of the western women. No matter how much her SMV declines be it through skiing down cawk mountain, fat as ****kkk, ****ty personality, student loans for absurd major like women studies or gender theory and basket weaving, low sex drive/not in the mood, cuckin, etc is what's wrong with women. How men dare flip a coin on said crap shoot with virtually Zero ROI is beyond stupid.

Peterson is correct in suggesting that marriage is for children contrary to female narcissistism. Ironically enough, it's women initiating 80% + divorce causing insurmountable trauma to the children. Higher risk of divorce, promiscuity, and a number of dangers as mommy goes slumming once single again.

It's the same thing with marriage. Once the ring is on, you've got a couple of kids? That guy is exposed. Yep, maybe he has a decent pre-nup but most guys, they either got married when they had nothing and/or were still in the fantasy love world and simply didn't do it. Even with a pre-nup, you're still going to get taken to the cleaners to some degree. There is the rare guy who made out ok in divorce but that's just not the norm.

Which is why it's not on a option.

If one is religious, create a new event if your own outside state and between you and God. State had nothing to do with marriage originally until women were made property in the event of cucking.

As long as cucks raise other man's babies, are marrying *****s, and the lack of consequences for disgusting female behaviour, nothing will change. I see the welfare state collapsing and women needing men due to war or some event. Women will be back in the kitchen making sandwiches and hiding with the children.

Cool story bro.

Women have shown their true nature. They are as they are and it's retarded to risk it all on a SMV that crumbles pretty fast.

RMG 38 depicted "are you getting her best."

This is SMV top form. This is a number of things but beta thirst clings to the first semi decent looking woman interested.


Years of pickup, I've seen patterns, and it's redundant. The best women I've had the pleasure with were sheltered as ****kkk, nuclear family, mom and dad at home, and the difference between the rest is unreal. I have learned when to pudh/pull/&&& next. Willingness to walk is key but with kids and marriage, it's not even a option. Nor is it if a wife cuts you off.

And that's why most women simply lay the blame and the responsibility for the relationship onto the guy. He has more skin in the game, he has more to lose, so it's easy for her to lay the responsibility off onto him. She can now put in nothing and get whatever she wants out of the relationship, which is little more than him being a pair of pants with a paycheck. Who is really going to desire and want to work on continuing to build the relationship when that's the case? She's got him over a barrel and she's supposed to give a sh*t about the state of the relationship? Most women are checked out by that point.

Rollo pointed out that women are a sexual commodity and act the part. Dress like sluts and are still entitled as if they were a prize regardless of how low her SMV is.

I know countless men who marry, give kids, are provider and they get cuucked plus divorce raped.

Said women in the middle East would be taken out, shot, and pissed on.

Sex? Companionship? Respect? Only a distant memory for him at that point. Gone are the times when they were dating when she hung on his every word and his johnson. Gone are the days when she bent over backwards and forwards for him. She has complete power over the relationship. She wants to walk out? No problem, she'll have the next guy lined up in a week. She wants him to do all the work to "save" the "relationship"? Why not, he has everything to lose, not her.

When the blow job's stop, it's over imho. The interest is gone.

What women fail to realise is that, what one woman won't do, another one will.

This herein lies a woman's performance burden but the barrier being the state. Women vote for large government. Women are the problem but it gives free resources.

These types of organizations and statistics only work when both parties have responsibility in the relationship. You're two kids deep and now she has to put in half of the money and only gets the kids 50% of the time if the relationship/marriage fails? You mean she doesn't get alimony and half of his retirement? Now she has a reason to try and work it out, even if she doesn't like him all that much at the time. Responsibility people, that's the only way marriages and families work, but it has to be on both.

You can't have it both ways. You can't have a bunch of hoes who are going to lay down with someone within 4 dates and have quality women who are worth being in a serious LTR with. You can't have a bunch of different plates and have one that is going to be worth putting any sort of risk into.

The whole quality woman mumbo jumbo is nonsense. The same do called quality is getting banged out in cancun SNL raw. Some cuck will call her wife.


Was seeing a chick age 25. So, 5yrs before the wall, and then, what? 70 maybe of the wall? Not in the mood? It fizzled out but my outlook is to chain gun cold approach. Spam. Obv calibrate.

The #1 female quality is her SMV and that includes her fertility. Women are in blissful ignorance squandering said resourced but it doesn't matter as some cuck will play house, foot the bill, and do so deeming the badge of honor marrying a *****.

Gun in the mouth when reality hits.

 

[highSpeed]

Agreed. But what marriage is and was aren't the same anymore.

"happy wife, happy life" is the doctrine of the western women. No matter how much her SMV declines be it through skiing down cawk mountain, fat as ****kkk, ****ty personality, student loans for absurd major like women studies or gender theory and basket weaving, low sex drive/not in the mood, cuckin, etc is what's wrong with women. How men dare flip a coin on said crap shoot with virtually Zero ROI is beyond stupid.

Peterson is correct in suggesting that marriage is for children contrary to female narcissistism. Ironically enough, it's women initiating 80% + divorce causing insurmountable trauma to the children. Higher risk of divorce, promiscuity, and a number of dangers as mommy goes slumming once single again.



Which is why it's not on a option.

If one is religious, create a new event if your own outside state and between you and God. State had nothing to do with marriage originally until women were made property in the event of cucking.

As long as cucks raise other man's babies, are marrying *****s, and the lack of consequences for disgusting female behaviour, nothing will change. I see the welfare state collapsing and women needing men due to war or some event. Women will be back in the kitchen making sandwiches and hiding with the children.

Cool story bro.

Women have shown their true nature. They are as they are and it's retarded to risk it all on a SMV that crumbles pretty fast.

RMG 38 depicted "are you getting her best."

This is SMV top form. This is a number of things but beta thirst clings to the first semi decent looking woman interested.


Years of pickup, I've seen patterns, and it's redundant. The best women I've had the pleasure with were sheltered as ****kkk, nuclear family, mom and dad at home, and the difference between the rest is unreal. I have learned when to pudh/pull/&&& next. Willingness to walk is key but with kids and marriage, it's not even a option. Nor is it if a wife cuts you off.



Rollo pointed out that women are a sexual commodity and act the part. Dress like sluts and are still entitled as if they were a prize regardless of how low her SMV is.

I know countless men who marry, give kids, are provider and they get cuucked plus divorce raped.

Said women in the middle East would be taken out, shot, and pissed on.



When the blow job's stop, it's over imho. The interest is gone.

What women fail to realise is that, what one woman won't do, another one will.

This herein lies a woman's performance burden but the barrier being the state. Women vote for large government. Women are the problem but it gives free resources.



The whole quality woman mumbo jumbo is nonsense. The same do called quality is getting banged out in cancun SNL raw. Some cuck will call her wife.


Was seeing a chick age 25. So, 5yrs before the wall, and then, what? 70 maybe of the wall? Not in the mood? It fizzled out but my outlook is to chain gun cold approach. Spam. Obv calibrate.

The #1 female quality is her SMV and that includes her fertility. Women are in blissful ignorance squandering said resourced but it doesn't matter as some cuck will play house, foot the bill, and do so deeming the badge of honor marrying a *****.

Gun in the mouth when reality hits.

Going to disagree on the quality woman comment. There are not many but they are out there. And my point to that was, you can't have it both ways. If someone or any of us would like or prefer a serious LTR, you can't be running around, expecting every woman to put out within 4 dates. If all you are looking for is a sperm dumpster, sure, I get it. If there are any women out there who are worth some type of long term commitment, it's not the type who will bend over on the first few dates.

 

[Chi Town]

Women want a strong, masculine, assertive and dominant man, but they also want him to be reliable, compliant and sensitive to her needs ECT the problem is most women can't find a guy with a good balance.

The guys who are the strong masculine ones are usually unreliable and not likely to stick around or there just not good long term material.

The guys who are reliable and are nice, loving caring guys who make great long term partners tend to be pushovers and weak azz men.

This is where the dating world gets frustrating for women.

If they can find a guy who is strong and MANLY with moments of kindness and sensitivity then she has a winner and she will hold on to him for dear life.

And yes, if a women finds a guy who is better than her current bf then she might not leave the bf because she's emotionally attached to him but she will definitely cheat behind his back, it's not a big deal, men do the same thing lol i don't know why guys on this site act like women are evil when we both do the same exact things lol

 

[Chi Town]

Because stable responsible men follow the rules, do the right thing and are boring and beta. Not all of them, but most guys are.

This, there always on there best behavior and always try to do everything right, does everything she says and are overly compliant. Women want men who will challenge them sometimes and a guy who is not afraid to stand up to her or put her in her place when she needs it. It's really that simple.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Going to disagree on the quality woman comment. There are not many but they are out there. And my point to that was, you can't have it both ways. If someone or any of us would like or prefer a serious LTR, you can't be running around, expecting every woman to put out within 4 dates. If all you are looking for is a sperm dumpster, sure, I get it. If there are any women out there who are worth some type of long term commitment, it's not the type who will bend over on the first few dates.

If you take the billion of people on the planet, subtract mm en from the equation, and just focus on women, you could not quantify the percentile worthy of marriage. It doesn't exist. Not by my definition.

Women, not men are the gatekeeper of sex. If after three encounters, if she's not caught hell or at the least, swallowed, I am onto the next one. This is the precedent that women set. I have to remind you, women aren't waiting, and the argument that all things are equal is moot at best. The things that make a man attractive aren't the same qualities in women. My **** isn't hard for her gender studies or basket weaving degree. I couldn't give a damn.

Pissing away her best years as a booty call in the name of edu, single mother victimhood, and or becoming infertile doesn't get my **** hard.

Women have been sold a bill of no goods and they're taking the bait, hook, line. And sinker. So be it. Society cheers women off the cliff. Cucks and betas chase down cratered SMV.

Meanwhile, new girls are turning 18 everyday.

So, I just sit back with that smug look on my face. I'm watching it burn. Entropy. I welcome the collapse. I just won't be putting society back together nor around for women seeking refuge as the sky falls.

Zero ****s given. I know 99% of men will be still thirsty little betas picking up the pieces of society and playing house with the women that brought the chaos in the first place. Not me. I will smash for sport. Chain gunning cold approach. And still deezed. But son, I will watch it all ****ing burn with a smile on my face.


The irony isn't lost on me. Its an actual inversion. Men seek order in a society and by their very nature, women bring chaos. A hard patriarchy is nazi Germany. We're seeing a hard matriarchy.

The female chameleon will be back in the kitchen making sandwiches and hiding with the kids when society fails. A lot of men will be back to the plantation. A growing amount of men are checked out.

I am out for number one. The collapse must happen in order for change but as long as the welfare state, daddy government, the parade of free resources, and thirsty betas, the inevitable will be prolonged. Its similar to the bail outs and printing of money.

Tuck that chin son. This won't end well.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

This, there always on there best behavior and always try to do everything right, does everything she says and are overly compliant. Women want men who will challenge them sometimes and a guy who is not afraid to stand up to her or put her in her place when she needs it. It's really that simple.

There's something to be said for one man who is high in conscienceness and low in agreeableness. The following converts in crushing it in business and *****. Women are aware be it consciously or unconsciously that the following is recipe for success and it coincides with hypergamy precisely.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Women want a strong, masculine, assertive and dominant man, but they also want him to be reliable, compliant and sensitive to her needs ECT the problem is most women can't find a guy with a good balance.

They can. The disconnect is in her entitlement.

The guys who are the strong masculine ones are usually unreliable and not likely to stick around or there just not good long term material.

The guys who are reliable and are nice, loving caring guys who make great long term partners tend to be pushovers and weak azz men.

This is where the dating world gets frustrating for women.

If they can find a guy who is strong and MANLY with moments of kindness and sensitivity then she has a winner and she will hold on to him for dear life.

And yes, if a women finds a guy who is better than her current bf then she might not leave the bf because she's emotionally attached to him but she will definitely cheat behind his back, it's not a big deal, men do the same thing lol i don't know why guys on this site act like women are evil when we both do the same exact things lol

A common thread. High earner man and woman mate. That or he's a higher earner. The promise being the great life and family they could have.

Kids come and she quits working. Dude now must work 2x as hard. Put in 80-100 he work weeks to sustain lifestyle. She cucks excusing his absenteeism and divorce rapes him for everything.


This is a redundancy in Western society and cucks fall for it time and again. Many a times, the wife cuts hubby off, and emasculated him in the workplace.

It's failed but, a slut tells are key in vetting women for retarded men stupid enough to marry.