I recently checked out one of the online dating forums, and man, it had the lowest standard of discussion I have ever seen online. SS is like a London gentleman's club by comparison. There were the usual trolls, thread derailments, and flame wars but they're a fringe presence everywhere. What stood out was the bullsh!t that the community (a clique of senior female posters) accepted as being a reasonable way to make a point (hint, it was neither).
It was relentlessly predictable in nature. A guy, or a renegade girl would pose a question or make a statement that threatened to shake The Matrix up a little. Cue the ad homs. Now, I don't mean that the discussion descended into personal attacks, I mean that's where it started. The poster (usually male) would stay on point making careful arguments, and the women would simply attack his appearance, character and motives until he was hounded out of the community. Sickening. Throw in some strawmen and shifting goalposts and that's as sophisticated as the female counter-arguments ever became.
It was almost entirely one-sided, the male posters exercised a tremendous amount of restraint, if they got personal it was only after a lengthy period of goading.
Even when their logical fallacies were pointed out to them and they were made to acknowledge that they weren't actually arguing the point, they were unapologetic. They felt entirely justified making venomous personal attacks because their feelings had been hurt when someone criticised something that was only peripherally related to them.
A lot of these vipers were capable of some thoughtful opinions when they weren't in attack mode, it just went out the window if they felt slighted by something. At which point, I was like oh damn! That is every argument I've ever personally had with a woman; at the first hint of being proven wrong, out comes the muttered comment about my height/weight/cawk/bank balance etc. you get the idea.
What does it mean? How is it useful? I'm not exactly sure.
Walk away, don't waste your breath probably.
Master DJ's, how do you argue with a woman and make it worth your while to do so?
It was relentlessly predictable in nature. A guy, or a renegade girl would pose a question or make a statement that threatened to shake The Matrix up a little. Cue the ad homs. Now, I don't mean that the discussion descended into personal attacks, I mean that's where it started. The poster (usually male) would stay on point making careful arguments, and the women would simply attack his appearance, character and motives until he was hounded out of the community. Sickening. Throw in some strawmen and shifting goalposts and that's as sophisticated as the female counter-arguments ever became.
It was almost entirely one-sided, the male posters exercised a tremendous amount of restraint, if they got personal it was only after a lengthy period of goading.
Even when their logical fallacies were pointed out to them and they were made to acknowledge that they weren't actually arguing the point, they were unapologetic. They felt entirely justified making venomous personal attacks because their feelings had been hurt when someone criticised something that was only peripherally related to them.
A lot of these vipers were capable of some thoughtful opinions when they weren't in attack mode, it just went out the window if they felt slighted by something. At which point, I was like oh damn! That is every argument I've ever personally had with a woman; at the first hint of being proven wrong, out comes the muttered comment about my height/weight/cawk/bank balance etc. you get the idea.
What does it mean? How is it useful? I'm not exactly sure.
Walk away, don't waste your breath probably.
Master DJ's, how do you argue with a woman and make it worth your while to do so?