In past eras, betas benefitted from the institution of marriage as it created a more beta-friendly sexual marketplace.
Agreed but I would go as far as to say, SOCIETY as a whole benefited VS untethered females hypergamy and single mother victimhood
we actually never know the true answer. All i know is marriage helps betas out big time in terms of getting a girl and getting laid. Because most girls would in a million years NEVER be with a beta other than marriage. And thats just facts.
.Lor mate,) (respectfully) I disagree.
It's a straw man argument feminism uses. The benefit is society VS that governments state and consequently single mother victimhood. The man backs a deprecated asset (if you dare to call it a asset).
There's a critique of a female dating coach. She warns 35+ women because of the wall, weight gain, and being virtually nonexistent. The woman goes on to say that women will want to be married to have her nails and hair done tohho shopping, and lists a series of things all monetary based, and nothing to do with love. It's sold out by mainstream marketing and to women who are on the carousel but need a fallback strategy. It's no longer even camouflaged otherwise.
She cannot compete with the hotter girls so she settles in her mind for provider. The only way back is forward. This is what is. Fellas need to get her on their program or #next.