spider_007 said:
oThe whole sex industry is plagued with drugies and victims of child abuse. There might be that 1% that's clean and normal, but I’m talking about the majority.
I don't know about that. Some women are into that too.
spider_007 said:
Just because she's cute and charges $1000 / hour doesn't mean i can't find one that looks & fvcks like her for $100. It' also doesn't mean she's doing it cause she likes it...
Allot of people do jobs they don't necessarily like to do...at least she is being generously compensated. A janitor, or someone cleaning toilets that have sh1t around may be getting minimum-wage.
Let's face it, these escorts probably make $ 10 000 in a week and receive validation that men love them sexually and are willing to pay to have them for a time.
spider_007 said:
Who do you think thought them to fvck whenever someone else wants...I’m telling you, it's either daddy, uncle, or mommys old boyfriend...
Take a week off, put together 5,000 and spend a week in a stripclub....you'll learn quick what sex industry really is.
I could give a day long lecture on the subject.
But you only use mainly street-hookers. I've contended that I think street-hookers are disgusting because now-a-days, most escorts that are worth fvcking put up ads on the internet and operate from their apartments and want to make quick cash to pay the bills or tuition and while I don't participate with that, I can see why a horney guy may go to them. Paying $ 100-$200 to do a hot girl that looks like a model and treats you like a king (assuming the service is good) does not seem like you are targeting a druggie, child abuse, or trafficking case but looks like a win-win scenario. She's making allot of money from people like you, and you have instant access to a hot girl that wouldn't give you the time of day in real life or don't have to worry about false rape charges after you are gone.
That being said, I think there is still one big disgusting red-flag element out of all this. The fact is the guy you just saw walk out of her apartment before you walked in will hit home that this lady may be seeing more than one guy that same day. Some of them do not clean up. Imagine going on a bed that is wet, or seeing her still dirty from the previous guy after you paid her, what you call "evidence of traffic". That to me is very disgusting to the point of nausea. I would imagine if you pay a higher price for some escorts, or look for it, you may find an escort that just sees one guy per day or a few guys but are spaced out so it doesn't look like an assembly line. But beyond that -- and I mean from a male's perspective, and not speculating on whether the woman has some sort of issues with drugs, child-abuse, or whatever, this sort of thing does seem rather disgusting on the "assembly line' or "evidence of traffic" sort of thing.
I don't think that ALL women who are promiscious, whether they do certain types of men in their preference or whatever premise they will do a random guy (including a fixed set of money) are necessarily abused as children. Some women actually just love having sex, right?