jhonny9546
Master Don Juan
Let's imagine your city has 10 gyms, and each gym has 1,000 members.
We have two individuals with very different approaches:
John: He's been going to the same gym for 10 years. Over that time, he's met about 100 people and formed close friendships with 10 of them. He's a well-known and respected figure within that single gym.
Mark: He goes to a different gym every year, cycling through all 10 gyms over a decade. He's met around 1,000 people in total and made friends with about 100. While he has a wide network of friends, he's not a central figure in any one gym, but is generally considered a friendly and approachable guy.
Which approach, John's or Mark's, is better if your goals are to maximize exposure to new people, establish true friendships, meet new women and expand your community? Would you rather be John or Mark?
(we could replace gym with everything that comes to your mind like "art club", "fishing club", "tennis club", etc etc)
We have two individuals with very different approaches:
John: He's been going to the same gym for 10 years. Over that time, he's met about 100 people and formed close friendships with 10 of them. He's a well-known and respected figure within that single gym.
Mark: He goes to a different gym every year, cycling through all 10 gyms over a decade. He's met around 1,000 people in total and made friends with about 100. While he has a wide network of friends, he's not a central figure in any one gym, but is generally considered a friendly and approachable guy.
Which approach, John's or Mark's, is better if your goals are to maximize exposure to new people, establish true friendships, meet new women and expand your community? Would you rather be John or Mark?
(we could replace gym with everything that comes to your mind like "art club", "fishing club", "tennis club", etc etc)
