Desdinova said:WTF? The answer is 21 days. If he's got enough money to pay both of them, then you go with the lowest common denominator which is the carpenter, and he's got some cash left over to go buy beer.
...unless the wording of the question is incorrect.
After re-examining that question, yes it is worded rather ambiguously.Desdinova said:Did that, and this is what I read in the original post:
He has enough to pay a plumber for 28 days and a carpenter for 21 day.
It could be read in the same manner you read it as: 'He has enough to (pay a plumber for 28 days and a carpenter for 21 days)'
Or it could be read in this manner: 'He has enough to pay plumber for 28 days, and (implied: enough to pay) a carpenter for 21 days'
It's like in real life when your friend says: 'I have enough money to buy a Lexus and a BMW.'
Usually you would interpret that to be: 'My money is enough so that it allows me to afford a Lexus or a BMW.' You wouldn't think: 'Your friend has enough money to buy BOTH the Lexus and BMW.'
But I agree, the wording is very suspect