But that shouldn't stop you from seeing and leading women.
They become manipulative and bring out their destructive inner behaviors because they aren't being led properly. They become serial c0ckriders, rationalizers for lack of loyalty and integrity, attention wh0res, downright insincere pr0stitue-type b*tches, and beta-chump value vampires.
It's just a fact of life.
It's also a reason why, if you want to play the LTR game, you need to take a woman who is already being properly led by her family (which includes a powerful father figure). This increases the likelihood that her innate desire to drain chumps and attract as much attention as possible from everyone has been tamed and that she is still unaware of her ability to do so.
But that's just for dudes who prefer the more peaceful route. I'll date any woman as long as she's interesting and not bad to look at. The only thing is, the worse her history is, the harder she'll have to work for any kind of exclusivity.
I'd say that the majority of women are capable of being led. The question, at least for me personally, is whether I want to lead her or not. Unless she's clinically BPD, histrionic, or has any real mental issues, I think most women, even those who have some masculine traits, can become deferential to a Man. Again..the question isn't whether it's possible or not...it's whether a dude wants to or not. A lot of you-go-girl chicks think that Men can't handle them. Actually, a Man can, but her looks probably aren't good enough to justify wasting the time to tame her.
Your girlfriend, your wife, your mom, your sister, your aunt. All are capable of being complete wh0res. The reason why they're not is probably because they have that healthy fear of being abandoned by that which gives them light and direction (husband, boyfriend, family, kids, etc.). Or they're just really ugly.
They become manipulative and bring out their destructive inner behaviors because they aren't being led properly. They become serial c0ckriders, rationalizers for lack of loyalty and integrity, attention wh0res, downright insincere pr0stitue-type b*tches, and beta-chump value vampires.
It's just a fact of life.
It's also a reason why, if you want to play the LTR game, you need to take a woman who is already being properly led by her family (which includes a powerful father figure). This increases the likelihood that her innate desire to drain chumps and attract as much attention as possible from everyone has been tamed and that she is still unaware of her ability to do so.
But that's just for dudes who prefer the more peaceful route. I'll date any woman as long as she's interesting and not bad to look at. The only thing is, the worse her history is, the harder she'll have to work for any kind of exclusivity.
I'd say that the majority of women are capable of being led. The question, at least for me personally, is whether I want to lead her or not. Unless she's clinically BPD, histrionic, or has any real mental issues, I think most women, even those who have some masculine traits, can become deferential to a Man. Again..the question isn't whether it's possible or not...it's whether a dude wants to or not. A lot of you-go-girl chicks think that Men can't handle them. Actually, a Man can, but her looks probably aren't good enough to justify wasting the time to tame her.
Your girlfriend, your wife, your mom, your sister, your aunt. All are capable of being complete wh0res. The reason why they're not is probably because they have that healthy fear of being abandoned by that which gives them light and direction (husband, boyfriend, family, kids, etc.). Or they're just really ugly.
