CornbreadFed
Master Don Juan
You aren't competing against 4chan lurking incel Nathaniel for women.I'm all for it, it removes my competition so lets go baby lets get these neck beards into AI and leave the real woman for me.
You aren't competing against 4chan lurking incel Nathaniel for women.I'm all for it, it removes my competition so lets go baby lets get these neck beards into AI and leave the real woman for me.
I think there will be just as many men as women that give up, cut back, etc. That's why I don't see the competition getting any easier. It will be less men to compete with, but also less women in the pool to select from.I'm all for it, it removes my competition so lets go baby lets get these neck beards into AI and leave the real woman for me.
Doesn't matter, because none of these attention wh0res are worth the attention they crave.It's going to affect both sides of the equation because it will make women's standards even more unrealistic. The 1% will move upwards with AI-based male social media accounts. Even if (some) women know certain IG-type accounts are fake, the overall set of features that women have on their laundry list of "must haves" will be influenced by AI. That feedback loop will impact dating as a whole, even for the guys with game.
You cant have kids with a 50 year old women either. I guess older guys then are justified by that argument if they cant get child bearing age women.You can't have kids with a sexbot.
You can't have kids with a Playstation 5 either. Most older guys are still invisible...they haven't become high value enough.You cant have kids with a 50 year old women either. I guess older guys then are justified by that argument if they cant get child bearing age women.
That is besides the point. If one makes a morality argument about sex is for procreation then that argument goes out the window after a certain age category.You can't have kids with a Playstation 5 either. Most older guys are still invisible...they haven't become high value enough.
At least a 50 y.o. has a real pu$$y where a sexbot does not.
Wait up, what if they make sexbots that can bear children? Some weird concept eh?
You are correct about the age because of eggs drying up barring if they get frozen. I'm personally not looking to have children right now.That is besides the point. If one makes a morality argument about sex is for procreation then that argument goes out the window after a certain age category.
You essentially upped your VALUE in her eyes by showing her that, if she wants you, she has to at times do things that you like to do. You are SOMETHING after all. You are NOT FREE. If she wants to hang with you, it's going to cost her something — time, effort, money.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
I dont disagree, but to be fair, that hapctic feedback and addaptive triggers are not half bad.Real box feels so much better than a robot, a PS5 controller, and my right hand.
Agreed. I don't think AI sex robots could ever replace a man for sex or companionship.Women are naturally social creatures a sex robot could never replace a man.
Once sex robots hit it wont be long till iRobot 13 comes out with the latest artificial womb with gene editing. The only implications I see happening is the female sex will die out (From an evolutionary stand point it isnt unheard of, lots of species that are unisexual).
It could be the next step in human evolution.
What makes you think Chad and Tyrone wouldn't buy a sex robot ?Most men are invisible to most women.
Chad and Tyrone don't worry about this because Bob and John are the ones simping/ dropping out/ buying sexbots.