Alright, perhaps some of you guys can explain this to me, because it seems like pure idiocy.
There is a lot of advice (from financial advisors and friends, etc,) on saving, and how absolutely important it is. Don't get me wrong, if you're able, putting a little money away for investment and/or emergencies is great.
But people seem to think that saving is so important that you should do it even when you're in debt.
To me this seems like a horrible suggestion, and here's why:
Unless you're some investment god (in which case you shouldn't have money problems anyway), you're not going to be getting any good returns on your savings. Most people will just throw the money in a savings account and make like 3% a year, ie nothing.
Meanwhile, they are paying interest on whatever loans they have, almost always at much higher percentages. This can range from low single digits for mortgages or car loans, up to the crazy 15-20% or more for credit cards.
So where is the logic here? Why would you take money that you could be using to pay down these crazy loans, and instead invest it in something that pays pennies (savings).
Instead, put ALL of your extra money toward your debts rather than savings, unless the debt is at 0% interest, in which case it obviously makes sense to invest the money. This WILL save you money.
And I don't buy the argument that you have to save even in such circumstances for emergencies. If you encounter an emergency, use loans/credit cards to cover them. This is better than saving the money, because until that emergency (or even better, if it doesn't happen), you're saving tons of money on interest.
Am I missing something, or is the conventional advice on this matter dumb?