“By the end of the year, there’s supposed to be 1.4 million people infected with Ebola and 62 percent of them dying, according to the [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention],” Marine Corps Gen. John F. Kelly said. “That’s horrific. And there is no way we can keep Ebola [contained] in West Africa.”
So there is the slip.
It's been deployed, now it's time to "stick to the plan".
If you read further into the article, it's the little details of "tone" that paint a bigger picture than the specific details the average american mouth-breather would be paying attention to.
"By the end of the year, there's SUPPOSED to be 1.4 million people infected with ebola and 62 percent of them dying, according to the CDC".
"Supposed"?
Here's a US military general talking in terms of what is supposed to happen. As in, "planned on", as in, "intended". He goes on further in the article to rap about indirect paths that terrorists
will lead infected people through to the U.S. border crossings.
Does anyone else get crazy chills reading this? Here is a general, talking in terms of "what will happen" as if "what will happen" is a "maybe". Oops, general, your tone is telling.
He might have just as well said: "So, our virus has gotten established, and nobody is paying attention since we've beaten them over the head for a few months in the media with it, now it's just a matter of getting Hasim Skari Boogeymohammed into Nicaragua so we scare everyone into upping border funding/closure to the south. Get those caskets and FEMA camps ready!"
When a general speaks in terms of "will", instead of "might", how is one left with any shred of doubt that this is a planned event? It seems obvious through this general's foreshadowing that what he described, with Ebola going through Nicaragua and into the US through the south, that it's settled and will go as planned. Wait, watch, and see if this isn't exactly how it's told to us. "Fox Alert: Ebola comes with terrorist through Texas border from Nicaragua; 62% dead."
“That’s horrific. And there is
no way we can keep Ebola [contained] in West Africa.”
DUHN, Duhn, Duhhhhh!
"No way"? Or, "we
won't contain it"? Because, their most certainly ARE ways to contain it, but, I don't believe the planners want it contained: the world is crazy overpopulated. What's the number for population they put on those "Georgia Guidestones"? Five hundred thousand? We've got a few to lose, according to that number.
Yes, I know what 'supposed' means. It could mean "projected", however, the syntax/context here is either indicative of knowledge that is understood, or, indicative of intimate familiarity with the subject due to planning and exposure to the concepts for a long while. The difference being the comfort level and familiarity with the subject:
"Well, listen interviewer, since you haven't been sitting through planning meetings discussing this stuff for the last couple years like I have, let me break it down for you according to how I have understood how this is going to play out."
All the ammunition shortages/purchases, the "conspiracy theorists" ideas about the stockpiles of plastic coffins, giving police military surplus, the FEMA camps...
Even a mouth-breather could see all the signs and go "Hmm... all the signs point to pre-planning for a catastrophe". But, even after false-flag evidence shows up like operation Northwoods, the same mouth-breather will continue to insist "our government wouldn't intentionally do anything bad".
When you get to the supermarket this weekend, and there is no canning salt on the store shelves, will it even register in your mind as "unsettling"?
It seems inevitable to me that, just with overpopulation of any species, humans have gotten to a point where mother nature checks the population. Be it with a disease, starvation, or violence, an overpopulated species has always balanced to a sustainable level through some sort of adversity. Too many fish in a tank? They start eating each other. Too many coyotes in an area? They get parasites from each other and die until parasites aren't transmitted anymore. We're facing that: we'll get parasites until the infected population can't infect the rest due to physical proximity.
The scariest part is that the media/government is blatantly explaining what will happen and people will deny the reality until blood is squirting out of their eyes onto their monitor while they are making "your mom has Ebola" troll threads on the internet.
I can't wait until we're all running around with paper masks on like they do in China. As if a paper mask does anything beyond make you look stupid. "I have a mask on! I'm safe!"
I'll say one thing is for sure: the day I see the mail carrier in a biohazard suit is the day I stop going to the mailbox. The whole "dot on the mailbox" thing is misunderstood. Red dot means infected body to pick up. We have the technology to selectively infect via unsuspecting vehicles like junk mail. I mean, if we can have "direct advertising", surely we can send anthrax covered or ebola infected mail to a mailing list of turds that need flushing. Data mining? You thought that was for anti-terrorist reasons? No... it's an IQ test to weed out human duds in the gene pool.
I will say one thing is also sure: I enjoy letting my imagination run buck-wild, but, sometimes things I laugh off happen for realz. As always, I have a feeling that I should be paying attention to something getting snuck by me that ISN'T in the news.
