About HB ratings...

[apprenticedj]

I've been doing an interesting little experiment, I've been rating the hottness of women I've been seeing out and about. This has lead me to reconsider our rating system. Let me see if I have this correct: We're using the standard 1-10 scale (1 being horrible, vomit inducing and 10 being model hot), pretty common in all BS ranking systems. So by that logic an HB5 would be exactly average? At least that is the mentality I'm using when thinking about this.

If this is the case, how many HB10's have you HONESTLY seen in the world? I'm trying very hard to think of some that I know but ZERO woman are in this category. In fact when I think about it I only know a handful of chicks that would be an HB8 on this scale.

Do I have it all wrong?!

Judging by the posters on this board (note: I take EVERYTHING I read on here with a grain of salt for sure) they seem to encounter them often. In the grocery store, at the bar etc. Also dudes are supposedly banging these HB9's on the regular? I've even heard guys talking about HB9-10's they've met on POF and OKC. I've been on both those sites and I've never seen a girl above a HB7 PERIOD. And those chicks had 4 kids, no job and no car.

So am I too critical when rating women or are my standards too low? Because I have no problem slamming a girl that I've rated a HB6!

 

[Eternal_water]

I don't use HB 1 - 10 or whatever it is.

I rank them thus

Yes (I would fvck her)
and
No (I wouldn't fvck her)

 

[LandingWood]

Average for me is 6-7. An 8 is overall attractive with no visible flaws and a 10 is a ****ing goddess like some fairy tale ****. Anything below 6 is bad.

 

[apprenticedj]

I don't use HB 1 - 10 or whatever it is.

I rank them thus

Yes (I would fvck her)
and
No (I wouldn't fvck her)

LOVE IT BRO!!! This is my new scale!

 

[Mike32ct]

HB numbers

1 - one look and you are scarred for life. Hideous.

2 - look at porn or turn gay

3 - look at porn and continue to enjoy the dry spell

4 - in case of ten year dry spell, break glass

5 - not too bad if you can get a boner

6 - average

7 - very cute

8 - hot

9 - super hot

10 - rare genetic perfection

 

[HumbleNinja]

I've been doing an interesting little experiment, I've been rating the hottness of women I've been seeing out and about. This has lead me to reconsider our rating system. Let me see if I have this correct: We're using the standard 1-10 scale (1 being horrible, vomit inducing and 10 being model hot), pretty common in all BS ranking systems. So by that logic an HB5 would be exactly average? At least that is the mentality I'm using when thinking about this.

If this is the case, how many HB10's have you HONESTLY seen in the world? I'm trying very hard to think of some that I know but ZERO woman are in this category. In fact when I think about it I only know a handful of chicks that would be an HB8 on this scale.

Do I have it all wrong?!

Judging by the posters on this board (note: I take EVERYTHING I read on here with a grain of salt for sure) they seem to encounter them often. In the grocery store, at the bar etc. Also dudes are supposedly banging these HB9's on the regular? I've even heard guys talking about HB9-10's they've met on POF and OKC. I've been on both those sites and I've never seen a girl above a HB7 PERIOD. And those chicks had 4 kids, no job and no car.

So am I too critical when rating women or are my standards too low? Because I have no problem slamming a girl that I've rated a HB6!

Depends in my view. If she looks good in here pictures she may start higher. Meet in person and not as good but body is slamming. lowered two points. chick has issues, kids etc. lowered even more.

It's a sliding scale.

Depends where you live with online dating itself. There are some 9s but not many. Big cities or places in the US by the water.

In real life? Much better chicks out. Especially in big cities where everyone's trying to make it and compete for the top spot.

Even still if a chick has issues, baggage, kids, is a moron, known slvt butt etc. that immediately changes the view of them and ranking in my eyes.

Unless you simply base everything off looks and don't actually talk to all kinds of women then that's all you have to go off of. (Not necessarily you but dudes who just see looks and either ignore everything else or simply look and never ever have talked to that "9-10")

 

[Lotus Effect]

I don't use HB 1 - 10 or whatever it is.

I rank them thus

Yes (I would fvck her)
and
No (I wouldn't fvck her)

^^^THIS!!

REPPED +1

(although I use the system for educational purposes)

 

[HyperAnalyze]

I mean if we are going on just looks, then Mike32ct has it down.

 

[GS750]

I use what I like to call the "Jones Scale". Star Jones is a 0. Catherine Zeta Jones is a 10...or used to be in the Zorro movies era. Everyone else is somewhere in between.

 

[Mr Wright]

It's subjective, hence it's stupid rating a girl.

Besides on different days, I find different things more attractive. Some days I want a taller girl, other days big boobs, another day a rounded behind. If your plates reflect your variety, you're doing it right.

Sometimes when guys post pictures of "super hot" girls on here, I cant help but think that some of those girls would be towards the end of my Christmas list because they'd have to be really naughty since they don't look nice :crackup:

Hence why the yes/no method works the best. Plus that gets the whole "omg shes a 9, I have to get my best game on" or if you get rejected by a 6, you wont get all vaginal about it.

Happy hunting

 

[Maximus Rex]

I've been doing an interesting little experiment, I've been rating the hottness of women I've been seeing out and about. This has lead me to reconsider our rating system. Let me see if I have this correct: We're using the standard 1-10 scale (1 being horrible, vomit inducing and 10 being model hot), pretty common in all BS ranking systems. So by that logic an HB5 would be exactly average? At least that is the mentality I'm using when thinking about this.

I rate 5's and 6's as average. There's nothing extraordinary about these chicks. Average looks, average titties, and an average a$$. These chicks are so f*cking plain that you wouldn't even notice them in the street.

The exception being chubby chicks (i.e. THE DOMINICAN CHICK that I'm practicing on or the Thai chick on the left. http://i850.photobucket.com/albums/ab64/OmnipotensMaximusRex/TheThaiChicks_zps5f9c09f5.jpg. When like this (though smashable,) don't come in higher on the Hot Babe scale because they're overweight. If they drop some pounds, they might come in a point, maybe a point and half higher.

7's are your basic cute chicks. For example, Taylor Swift http://www.resimdeki.com/foto/Taylor-Swift-Resimleri-5.jpg

Jennifer Lawrence http://www.hdwallpapersdj.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Jennifer-Lawrence-Hot-6.jpg

or Chloe Moretz https://static.squarespace.com/stat...o-join-denzel-washington-in-the-equalizer.jpg

I would say that 7's have a girlish innocence about them.

Then you have your 8's. Chicks that are nicely proportioned and look very womanly. Chicks like Beyonace http://blog.northjersey.com/thebeat/files/2013/08/fanpop.jpg

Selena Gomez http://www.theimproper.com/film/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/SelenaGomez-Bikini-SpringBreakers071.jpg (though Selena looks like she's 16)

I would say that Kate Upton and Scarlett Johansson are 9's

http://25.media.tumblr.com/ff23786d4a5d4b2225d51112bdff77ca/tumblr_mtyufgPtIY1ra1vdmo1_1280.jpg

http://www.sumcss.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/scarlett-johansson-height.jpg

If this is the case, how many HB10's have you HONESTLY seen in the world? I'm trying very hard to think of some that I know but ZERO woman are in this category. In fact when I think about it I only know a handful of chicks that would be an HB8 on this scale.

I have. Once at the Metropolitan Avenue train station there was this Spanish chick about 5'4" 5'3", big titties, big ass, long black hair, light in complexion.

Another time was in the nudey bar I used to frequent, the one of the working girls was just straight BAD. She was built the same way as the fore mentioned Spanish chick and she was absolutely gorgeous. I would to the nudey simply to look at this chick.

Kim Kardashian (pre baby) Kim Kardashian is exactly how many fantasy b*tch is built. The only thing she's missing is green eyes.

This chick was a 10 at 15 http://blogs.bet.com/entertainment/spotlight/bet-blog/assets/2008/10/kim-k-15yr-old.jpg

http://i850.photobucket.com/albums/...e-2548-474c-a01b-0962e891a939_zps58e8b81f.jpg

http://img18.imagevenue.com/aAfkjfp01fo1i-31856/loc671/96348_tiara470_123_671lo.jpg

^^^ That's Tiara my godkids auntie. The first picture is of about 14 or 15 in high school and the other one is one of her modeling pictures. I always thought she was a 10.

 

[NewJack]

Making a scale implies there is universality to this concept, e.g. whats true for you is true for me.

But that clearly isnt the case. So...

 

[Vidrio]

Average for me is 6-7. An 8 is overall attractive with no visible flaws and a 10 is a ****ing goddess like some fairy tale ****. Anything below 6 is bad.

I've yet to consider any woman a "10."

Both of these. A 10 to me is a woman who is literally physically perfect in every way. That doesn't exist.