persiangino said:
Son? haha
Their are universal traits that all women find attractive in a man (ie tall, large eyes/shape of the eyes, facial structure)
Just because some short, fat, kid may seem attractive to some ugly ***** don't mean jack ****. We're talking about the looks that attract HB9+ as a generality but of course their are always exceptions.
OK son?
heres a lesson for ya son.
those traits you list arent truly universal. for example, you find me a tall guy with all those traits you listed, and Ill find you plenty of hot women who think hes fugly. In other words, there are no traits in existance that can be attractive to 100% of the female population. This is due to variance in genetic and environmental influences which dictate our behavior, including what we are attracted to.
In the reverse, I can find you a man who lacks all those traits (an ugly dude), and I can also find you some hot women who think hes fine as hell.
universally attractive traits really arent universally attractive, universally ugly traits really arent universally ugly.
Although, its true that a guy with those "universally attractive" traits will have a higher probability of a random woman thinking he hot than a guy who lacks all those traits. but my point is, theres a subjective element involved, alot of guys including you cant grasp this.
Theres an element of randomness and subjectivity to attractivness and beauty. Its not really universal. Look at women, take pamela anderson, she has the "universal" female beauty traits, yet there are plenty of men out there who tihnk shes ugly. take any "hot" female celebrity and ask guys opinions, alot will say shes hot, others will say shes ugly. proof that theres subjectiveness involved. same goes for male attractiveness.
get it right son.