5-7000 years ago, there were 17 men for every woman

[MatureDJ]

Why Do Genes Suggest Most Men Died Off 7,000 Years Ago?

Modern men's genes suggest that something peculiar happened 5,000 to 7,000 years ago: Most of the male population across Asia, Europe and Africa seems to have died off, leaving behind just one man for every 17 women.

www.livescience.com

Modern men's genes suggest that something peculiar happened 5,000 to 7,000 years ago: Most of the male population across Asia, Europe and Africa seems to have died off, leaving behind just one man for every 17 women.

According to their new explanation, the male population didn't take a nosedive, but rather the diversity of the Y chromosome decreased due to the way people lived and fought with each other.

It's OVER for 16/17thsCels.

 

[Plinco]

17 men for every woman or 17 women for every man?

 

[MatureDJ]

17 men for every woman or 17 women for every man?

16 men who didn't have poon one way or another - i.e., being either prehistoric Incels and/or corpses - and 1 that had a harem of 17.

 

[MatureDJ]

Yeah, you got your numbers reversed there buddy. If most men died off, women would outnumber men greatly.

17 sloots per player. Excellent ratio.

You have CorrectMogged me. Still, it means 16 Incels or DeadCels for every man with poon.

 

[Millard Fillmore]

But just think of all the men-only spaces!

 

[Serenity]

Looks like it's more about a lack of genetic diversity, so probably still way more than 1 man to 17 women, they just had the same Y chromosome. That's what they find and analyze after 5-7000 years, the DNA and more specifically the male chromosome, they're not directly counting the remains of 1 man for every 17 women.