10K for a hug.

[corrector]

Fvck him. Simps are ruining the market.

How did he ruin the market if she was taken? She was not even in the market in the first place. Also, she doesn't fit into the black pill narrative, otherwise, wouldn't she be aware of her SMV and then breaking up with her bf and trade up for a chad? Her bf looks like a normie.

 

[corrector]

Well, the mistake is that he is a simp, and that he is simping.
I guess if that's what he wants to do, you might argue that it isn't a mistake. But you have to think there would be better use for that guy's $10,000. Surely you could buy a hug somewhere cheaper than that lol.

But it's his money and his choice of what to do with it. It's interesting that there are any standards at all on what is a secular board.

At the very least, if you are going by that angle, at least a guy benefitted from it which is the girl's normie bf. Isn't it at least good for him?

There is always a winner and loser with guys. That means her bf is a normie, was able to get this hot girl who is paying for vacations from her side hussle. Does it matter which guys is the winner or loser as long as some guy wins and it's not just the women at the expense of men?

 

[zekko]

There is always a winner and loser with guys. That means her bf is a normie, was able to get this hot girl who is paying for vacations from her side hussle. Does it matter which guys is the winner or loser as long as some guy wins and it's not just the women at the expense of men?

I'm not sure I'd consider the boyfriend the winner, considering the prize is this girl who is wh0ring herself out online (at least metaphorically). Maybe they have an open relationship?

 

[Dr.Suave]

Surely you could buy a hug somewhere cheaper than that lol.

He can hug me for $100

 

[HaleyBaron]

I bid $99 for the hug.

 

[AureliusMaximus]

Friendzone isn’t cheap anymore.

Its never been cheap dude.

 

[zekko]

He can hug me for $100

$100 for him, $50 for Chad lol.