The way your post sounds, I would imagine you'd think that no guy needs help. So, what are legitimate cases in your view?5string said:Des
I get what you are saying about men being ignored and the emphasis is on women....because they are women. I get the point.
But granted, some people need help and should get it no doubt.
How do you figure that? What about the ecomony? What about all the jobs being shipped to India and China and the shrinking middle-class? You've got a nation of haves and have nots. Statistically, most of the wealth is concentrated into a few hands.5string said:If one in three single guys needs goverment assistance in Canada, that tells me that they have one bigtime fvcked up entitlement system there.
Yes, he should go and panhandle for change on a busy street, rob a bank, join organized crime, or break and enter people's homes. Having no other options, as you said, a man should take care of himself first. That way, tax-payers can subsidize jail costs, hey maybe a lawsuit for millions of dollars against the system for unfair treatment against the police or system.5string said:Boo fvcking hoo.
A man should step up and take care of himself first and foremost, and not rely on his fellow taxpayers to subsidize his bad decisions and lifestyle.
But why shouldn't a woman have to do the same? About the only way a man can take care of himself is with a job, which is easier for a woman to get. Men have not only an unfair and unlevel playing field, but a sometime no field out to get into the game. Plus a female can always shack up with a man to support her.5string said:Des
I get what you are saying about men being ignored and the emphasis is on women....because they are women. I get the point.
But granted, some people need help and should get it no doubt. If one in three single guys needs goverment assistance in Canada, that tells me that they have one bigtime fvcked up entitlement system there.
Boo fvcking hoo.
A man should step up and take care of himself first and foremost, and not rely on his fellow taxpayers to subsidize his bad decisions and lifestyle.
It has nothing to do with it practically. But it is commentary on why women can function without men. Seduction is tied to economics. When women didn't have so much economic choices, they had a strong incentive to attract and cling to men. Women will working the pvssy for economic reasons. All this feminism and social leanings to give women economic advantage is largely so they don't have to work their sexuality.Zarky said:what does this have to do with seduction?
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.
Nothing, but here's the description of what is acceptable in this forum:Zarky said:what does this have to do with seduction?
I pity guys who believe cvnt is the only thing worth fighting for or discussing.Zarky said:what does this have to do with seduction?
So this is a place to discuss prostate problems and liver spots too?Desdinova said:Nothing, but here's the description of what is acceptable in this forum:
A forum for DJs at least 25 years old to discuss problems, situations, and techniques UNIQUE to older and more mature men.