Things Women Say But Don't Actually Mean (TIER LIST)

[CornbreadFed]

Good Video

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

Good Video

Great, some incel with too much time on his hands makes a 15 minute video to explain that you should never take whatever a woman says at face value. How incredibly insightful.

Trust? What does trust have to do with anything?

I may have mentioned this already several times on this forum: "Never take what women/anyone says at face value." Don't focus on the words, focus on the meaning.

View attachment 12465

Language is rarely used in the literal sense. Most of what people say is figurative. "That kills me, haha." No, it's not killing you.

When a woman tells you, "I love you till the ends of the earth" both of you know she speaking figuratively, since the earth is a globe, so there are no ends to the earth. Only idiots/flat-earthers take what a woman says literally.

Some men call this 'w0manese', but I just call it 'reading people'. If you stop listening to the words and listen to the tone and someone's non-verbal cues, you can see that their words are often unrelated or even contradicting what they mean to say.

Women tend to avoid confrontation. One way of conflict avoidance is to speak indirectly. Like using innuendo / double entendres to signal that she wants to have sex with you without telling you directly 'Hey, let's have sex'. Experienced men have no trouble reading the indirect speech correctly and act on it.

And that's what you should focus on, if you want to be a 'Don Juan'.

 

[CornbreadFed]

Great, some incel with too much time on his hands makes a 15 minute video to explain that you should never take whatever a woman says at face value. How incredibly insightful.

Okay Scrooge McCat lol.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

Okay Scrooge McCat lol.

I think you're lying about your age.

 

[Clockwerk50]

Okay Scrooge McCat lol.

Ask him for those receipts @CornbreadFed

 

[SW15]

I watched this in its entirety. I mostly agreed with the tier list.

I don't think the "I have a boyfriend" line was explained well, but I think his placement of it as an untruth was accurate enough.

In general, most women have a boyfriend or are married at any given time.

Women who are married are easily avoided. The ring on their finger on the left hand is obvious. I will do a quick hand glance in certain non-bar venues like grocery stores before approaches. It's very difficult to seduce a married woman off of a random non-bar approach, even more difficult than a woman with a boyfriend or a woman not in a relationship at that moment. Additionally, I choose to spend time in parts of my city that are mostly unmarried people. Unmarried does not equal unattached.

Women with boyfriends are tricky. Most of the time they won't let you know with words that they have a boyfriend. A good portion of women with boyfriend are good at avoiding getting approached. They will often put out bad body language indicating they don't want to be approached. They will be unresponsive to smiles and good eye contact. They will not engage verbally in any meaningful way if an approach actually happens, shutting down the conversation within 30 seconds. Most of them will be wearing headphones/earbuds on walking paths/in parks/in the gym and will avoid the approach. Some unattached women act similarly, but these are behaviors more common with attached and unmarried women in bigger city neighborhoods that are mostly unmarried people.

"I have a boyfriend" becomes an untruth when it is said in a longer approach at the moment when she is asked on a date or asked for her phone number. If she did a 3-5 minute conversation with you and she says that, then it is usually cap.

If a guy asks her out almost immediately in a conversation without working up to that point with some level of rapport (Vibing-Investing-Stacking from the London Daygame Model), then "I Have a Boyfriend" might be the truth. It's best to figure out if she has a boyfriend before bothering to ask her out and then collecting her contact information.

 

[CornbreadFed]

In general, most women have a boyfriend or are married at any given time.

Agreed, and I think that women start to monkey branch when their bf starts cracking or maybe she dated the bf for psychological reasons and doesn’t care. Usually women have 1-2 guys in the bullpen they have ready to call after the breakup happens.

 

[SW15]

I think that women start to monkey branch when their bf starts cracking or maybe she dated the bf for psychological reasons and doesn’t care. Usually women have 1-2 guys in the bullpen they have ready to call after the breakup happens.

Most middle aged or younger women (women 50 and younger) will have an opportunity to monkey branch. It doesn't mean that they will do it, but it's something that is in place for most of them in longer term relationships.

Things get more interesting when a woman decides to pass on her most immediate monkey branching options.

That's when she will be more likely to consider her social media DMs, swipe apps, and various real life approaches.

Women who have tended to ride the penis carousel and have shorter relationships (1 year or less) might have built up fewer monkey branch options. Women who have lived in a city for less time also won't have as many monkey branch options. USA Sun Belt cities like Dallas, Phoenix, Houston, Atlanta, Nashville, etc. have plenty of recent adult transplants in the dating pool who haven't had time to find monkey branch options too.

I've also noticed that aging (30s/40s) mid-tier women tend to have fewer monkey branch options, especially if they've had a history of relocation.

 

[Dr.Suave]

Usually women have 1-2 guys in the bullpen they have ready to call after the breakup happens.

Most women, yes. My younger sister recently broke up her relationship. Next thing you know she´s calling a former orbiter on the phone.

 

[CornbreadFed]

I've also noticed that aging (30s/40s) mid-tier women tend to have fewer monkey branch options, especially if they've had a history of relocation.

Never underestimate the power of thirsty men lol

 

[RangerMIke]

Really no need analyze what women say. This might have some entertainment value, as how Doc Love did in his book, it's funny but really meaningless.

Ignore what people, not just women, say while paying close attention to what they do and you'll be fine. This is something you should have learned in kindergarten.

 

[CornbreadFed]

Ignore what people, not just women, say while paying close attention to what they do and you'll be fine. This is something you should have learned in kindergarten.

Or just focus on yourself and not deal with hypocrites lol.

 

[SW15]

Never underestimate the power of thirsty men lol

I just made a post a moment ago about thirsty men.

Men are getting thirstier and more desperate for sex in general. When men lack sufficient sex, they will often consider new options for sex that they wouldn't previously considered.

There are 30s/40s men who will do thirsty things in order to get sex with 30s/40s women. I've seen childless men in this age range pursue single moms as a sexual strategy.

 

[CornbreadFed]

I just made a post a moment ago about thirsty men.

Men are getting thirstier and more desperate for sex in general. When men lack sufficient sex, they will often consider new options for sex that they wouldn't previously considered.

There are 30s/40s men who will do thirsty things in order to get sex with 30s/40s women. I've seen childless men in this age range pursue single moms as a sexual strategy.

I’m glad men have calmed down on “The Wall” argument because it was complete cope. I know plenty of men, high value, low value, good looking, ugly, that would put their weenies in a 50 year old woman lol.

 

[SW15]

I’m glad men have calmed down on “The Wall” argument because it was complete cope.

In 2014, Roosh wrote an article about The Wall being softer than most men think it is. It is still applicable in 2024-2025, if not more applicable.

The Wall Is Softer Than We Think

The Wall is softer than most men think that it is, though it can be felt by some women more so than others.

I know plenty of men, high value, low value, good looking, ugly, that would put their weenies in a 50 year old woman lol.

I agree that this can happen. I don't agree with it. I pursue women younger than me exclusively.

While a woman tends to get less attention as she ages, women 35+ do still get plenty of attention in a lot of cases and are pursued heavily. While a 35+ woman might get approached less in real life than a 20-25 year old woman, she can still use swipe apps to capture a lot of attention. Women in their late 30s/early 40s on swipe apps still have abundance on swipe apps and sometimes in their social media DMs.

There's still plenty of demand for older women's pussies out there, especially from the tech based methods.