Impact of being low inibition and NT

jhonny9546

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 17, 2024
Messages
744
Reaction score
98
Age
30
Location
Italy
While being low in inhibition and low in neuroticism and high NT might seem beneficial in certain contexts, it generally poses challenges for developing maturity in men. Maturity typically involves self-control, emotional intelligence, and the ability to navigate complex social landscapes.

On the other hand, low inhibition and high neuroticism can be beneficial for the "IDGAF" mindset, which is also a key aspect of life.

It would be awesome to hear more about how these characteristics change your life and open "doors" to social possibilities.

---


There's also something that connects to this topic, like a quote I've heard from my friend, the CEO, and I've also seen it in various posts on the forum: "It doesn't matter WHAT you say, or if what you say is nonsense; it's HOW you say it that makes it a statement—something that is 100% true and reliable."

Nothing could be more true.

It's like when you scold a child by saying that if he doesn't eat everything on his plate, the black wolf will come and eat his feet. You know that it's completely fake, but you understand how to say it in order to get the child to follow your advice.

But is this really how we should live our lives with other people? How do we feel about ourselves in such situations? Will this improve our value to others? It’s essentially how politicians talk.
 
Last edited:

GoodMan32

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 14, 2022
Messages
1,244
Reaction score
399
Since I'm high inhibition, I'm unable to comment on what it's like to be low inhibition.

I will say, however, you made a good point I hadn't thought of. While being low inhibition is beneficial in the sense that you have no qualms about making a move on broads, low inhibition traits also mean you're prone to impulsive behavior (which could come back to bite you)
 

jhonny9546

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 17, 2024
Messages
744
Reaction score
98
Age
30
Location
Italy
(which could come back to bite you)
I think there should be a median treshold for a good combination of both.
For example, what I've noticed lately, is that you can be good, and convince with actions, but there is an irresistible charm for those who can convince with words, even in the long term they can maintain things. (if they are not devoid of content)
 
Top