By 2030, 45% of American women will be single & childless

[MatureDJ]

Michael Sartain is well known for saying that 80% of men are invisible to women. Rollo Tomassi is well known for saying that the average woman isn't interested in the average man.

You're correct that women are far more selective now than in recent decades in the past. Sexlessness has even increased since the 2000s, which wasn't too long ago.

The middle of the bell curve man has struggled more since the 2000s as compared to a middle of the bell curve man of the 1970s-1990s.

It's OVER for BellCurveMeanCels.

 

[SW15]

It's OVER for BellCurveMeanCels.

I laughed. While there is no such thing as a BellCurveMeanCel, it is true that more men in the middle of the bell curve on SMV are incel/borderline incel.

 

[MatureDJ]

I laughed. While there is no such thing as a BellCurveMeanCel, it is true that more men in the middle of the bell curve on SMV are incel/borderline incel.

This is just a way of saying it's OVER for MidNormieTierCels.

 

[MatureDJ]

Other things that improve your smv drastically is living a cool life. You can score 1-2 points from this too if done properly

Uh, have you ever noticed that it's a lot easier for Chad-tier men to be "cool"?

You can get also extra 1-2 points if you are not boring like the vast majority of guys, basically being a good conversationalist

I agree with this - but this only works with intelligent women, as less-intelligent women will take the dumb Chad over the smart Normie. Thankfully for me, intelligence is the only thing that I definitely mog most men on.

 

[Bigpapa]

Uh, have you ever noticed that it's a lot easier for Chad-tier men to be "cool"?

This thing is like saying that rich people can afford to spend more

You have to make the best with what you got, this is how things work

 

[SW15]

Pearl offered her take on what she sees in the future based on the Morgan Stanley 2030 projection mentioned in the first post.

 

[Manure Spherian]

Pearl offered her take on what she sees in the future based on the Morgan Stanley 2030 projection mentioned in the first post.

One should also see her recent conversation with Michael Knowles, who expressed the most severe case of tradcuck delusion I’ve ever witnessed in my personal sex education.

Having such a severe excess of unmarried, childless women is going to be a brutal burden on society, just like mass inceldom is a burden on society.

Fixing the American sexual market will take measures that even those who are currently suffering from its current conditions are scared of being implemented because they involve being mean to women. Anything short of allowing women whatever they please is mean to women, including literal society-wrecking behaviors.

Hopefully one day we can go back to not only slut shaming, but shunning tradcucks and make feminists, putting the divorce industry out of business, and reimplementing male authority over wives and daughters.

 

[SW15]

One should also see her recent conservatives with Michael Knowles, who expressed the most severe case of tradcuck delusion I’ve ever witnessed in my personal sex education.

Pearl isn't much of an original thinker. Most of her ideas come from people like Richard Cooper or Rollo Tomassi. Pearl's YouTube channel has more Followers than Fresh & Fit, Richard Cooper, or Rollo Tomassi. Her Follower count makes her worthy of mention in discussion even if her originality is often lacking. Her Follower count is due to her having a vagina and breasts. Her looks are not that impressive either.

If Rollo believed his long marriage (25+ years) was a sustainable model for a large percentage of males to follow, he would have ended up being similar to Matt Walsh, Ben Shapiro, or Michael Knowles.

Thank you for posting the video as I think it is a good idea.

make feminists

You meant 'male feminists' here. Male feminists are annoying. Male feminists are doing what they are doing to try to get laid with female feminists.

Having such a severe excess of unmarried, childless women is going to be a brutal burden on society, just like mass inceldom is a burden on society.

A severe excess of unmarried, childless women is nearly unprecedented in history.

I'm 40 years old. There are many unmarried, childless women near my age if I chose to date women close to my own age. I have typically dated slightly younger women up to this point but would like to achieve some bigger age gaps now.

From age 30 to today, I have not had much of a problem finding women close to my age who are childless to date. I know where to hunt to find these women.

 

[Manure Spherian]

From age 30 to today, I have not had much of a problem finding women close to my age who are childless to date. I know where to hunt to find these women.

I get that. However, your ease in attracting such women has nothing to do with the societal burden they represent.

Rollo and Cooper aren’t original either.

 

[Manure Spherian]

Thank you for posting the video as I think it is a good idea.

Thanks.

However I think Rollo’s marriage is sustainable as are some others, though they obviously are becoming rarities. I personally will not divorce except for serious transgressions (abuse, cheating, withholding sex, dereliction of duties).

 

[Fortune_favors_the_bold]

Having such a severe excess of unmarried, childless women is going to be a brutal burden on society, just like mass inceldom is a burden on society.

All those single unmarried childless women are gonna be a political and economical burder on society that even if male incels were to form a militia coulnt even come close to in terms of general damage.

 

[Manure Spherian]

All those single unmarried childless women are gonna be a political and economical burder on society that even if male incels were to form a militia coulnt even come close to in terms of general damage.

We already are paying for women’s excesses, socially, financially, and mentally. Even so-called Chads are presenting anti-social behaviors.

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

More often than not, when women get older and they still don't have children they go looney toons.

And many of them get involved in politics or other positions of power or even make crappy Star Wars content.

 

[SW15]

From age 30 to today, I have not had much of a problem finding women close to my age who are childless to date. I know where to hunt to find these women.

your ease in attracting such women has nothing to do with the societal burden they represent.

Part of being an effective seducer is knowing how to game the system.

Your point is valid though. What might be acceptable for me on an individual level isn't good for the collective of the culture.

 

[Manure Spherian]

And many of them get involved in politics or other positions of power or even make crappy Star Wars content.

Spot on. They become the shock troops and proxy warriors of society-wrecking causes and policies.

Lol at female politicians, judges, lawyers, and yes, voters. Freaking lulz.

Men should vote on behalf of their families, and that’s it. But we know we’re not going to do that because that would be mean.

 

[Manure Spherian]

The effects on children will be even worse than they are now.

All those single unmarried childless women are gonna be a political and economical burder on society that even if male incels were to form a militia coulnt even come close to in terms of general damage.

 

[SW15]

They become the shock troops and proxy warriors of society-wrecking causes and policies.

Lol at female politicians, judges, lawyers, and yes, voters. Freaking lulz.

Men should vote on behalf of their families, and that’s it. But we know we’re not going to do that because that would be mean.

In blue pill normie circles in the USA, no one would ever discuss the idea that the 19th Amendment ratified in 1920 (women gaining the right to vote) was a bad thing.

Various Manosphere commentators have mentioned that in their content.

I believe there is some link between feminism (a driving force behind the 19th Amendment) and the trend of more unmarried, childless women.

Most unmarried, childless women between ages 25-44 do have boyfriends at any given time and are not seeking new penis. This doesn't affect the sexual marketplace that much on the individual level but likely has broader cultural consequences.

 

[Manure Spherian]

Most unmarried, childless women between ages 25-44 do have boyfriends at any given time and are not seeking new penis.

My hunch is that nearly all of these relationships or what we call “boyfriends and girlfriends” are utterly worthless, hence why they are changed like underwear.

Boyfriend and girlfriend. Def: Two people playing house and screwing each other until one or both “get bored”. A sexual union in which either sex plays employer or employee.

 

[SW15]

My hunch is that nearly all of these relationships or what we call “boyfriends and girlfriends” are utterly worthless, hence why they are changed like underwear.

Boyfriend and girlfriend. Def: Two people playing house and screwing each other until one or both “get bored”. A sexual union in which either sex plays employer or employee.

You have a valid point on the worthlessness of relationships in this era. This goes well with my heavily promoted "shelf life of goodness of relationships" idea. Marriages are worthless in this era as well. No fault divorce exists and women can leave whenever they want. Additionally, the family court system benefits women. There's not much of an incentive for women to stay in marriages in the current era.

The best way to keep a woman in any sort of relationship in this era is to have a hot physique and D her down better than other guys.

 

[Manure Spherian]

What we have to look forward to, more of this, unhinged, lunatic women rallying, complaining, hooting and hollering and made-up criminal charges (I’m not talking about actual rape), neglected and abused children, and simps doing whatever they demand, either for profit or to get laid.