Replying twice to you is not "obessessing", nor is it it "neurotic". I guess you can't contradict my points, so you're left insulting me?
In a thread where you're making wild claims about dating Saudi royalty, spotting inconsistencies and false claims seems relevant to determining if we should trust a new poster making those claims.
My first post pointed out "you're adding up the wealth of 2,000 royals and pretending its owned by one Saudi Princess" [1], and here you are making the exact same flawed assumption: "the Saudi royal family is wealthier than those 2 people combined." Your virtual Saudi princess doesn't get to spend everything the Saudi family owns. If you weren't being literal, why do you keep repeating the same thing?
You can't conflate the Saudi family net worth with the net worth of this virtual Saudi princess you're dating. Her individual net worth - what she can spend as an individual - has nothing to do with what her 15,000 relatives can spend on themselves. So yeah, I've replied twice to correct you on the same point. You claim you weren't literal, then you take it literally. Then you respond again, making the exact same point you claim was you not being literal. Seems like you really think this - it's not out of context or taking it too literally.
How about this - you stop insulting me and making false assumptions, and I can let it go at that.
[1]