Women request a certain height from men on datings apps, interviews, when they are being set up, etc. Its what they say they want. It’s not so much about worrying about it, it’s a fact in attraction.
Yep... these women really don't exist to a man that does not meet their criteria, and should be ignored by men that do not fit their wants.
When I was writing what I was writing about 38-42 year old men, I was thinking about men with some affluence but not outrageous affluence. I was thinking about men who might be making about $200,000 - $300,000 annually and maybe a net worth in the high hundreds of thousands to possibly low millions.
Sadly it seems men don't want to be the exception to the rule anymore on this forum but want to have confirmation bias. I always say the best wingman I ever saw "Pick Up" was 5'4 broke, 140 pounds(always wore the same white button-up), and looked like a balding dollar store version of Tom Cruise. Mind you I got 8 inches on him and at the time was in the best shape of my life but this guy was killing me infield Truly an inspiration at the time.
That's because he looked like a version of Tom Cruise.... Doesn't matter if it's a not as good Tom Cruise. This reinforces what @Hamurabimbi believes which is that face trumps all.
Why do you figure that? He got the Asian because he was White, not because of his height.
Short & unattractive is life on hard mode. White & tall is probably something she likes.
If he was White & Short then he'd still have a looksmatch Asian gf. You said they were looksmatch after all. The point of the thread was about height. In other words, I'm challenging your assertion that if he was shorter he would be incel. I've seen funny and scruffy looking White guys, in the past, with hot Ethnics that you would wonder "what is the deal here?"
The SF Bay Area is WMAF central.
Okay. It's like Toronto then.
he’s a 3/10 facially.
While I am not fond of the terms Alpha, Beta.... and all the Greek alphabet descriptions of men because that is mostly that is an over simplification, this is true. I have seen this A LOT.
You do what you can with what you have been giving, some men look good, it's easier some men are ugly it's harder
Which ones?
I place experience above 'theory'
What if what they say its just to be "nice", but instead they want to say "something else"?
So that's a matter of experience. Pattern recognition. Are they doing it to politely end the conversation? Are they managing your perceptions (manipulation)? Or do they being candid (honesty in 'motion')?
I agree. The Pure Black Pill is wrong. But. I do believe the Black Pill, which holds. looks>>>everything else, is generally correct. Perhaps a pure Black Piller would hold Looks alone matter. But. A step out into the real world proves that false.
How you look is very much integrated with everything else you do in life, your physical health, emotional health, financial and professional health, etc. The debate over whether which is more important, looks, game, status, ect. is nonsense in my opinion because all of these traits go together. So if you are short you can compensate in other ways. I'd be willing to bet that height doesn't matter as much as black pillers think it does.
