I agree with this. This has been unfortunate for me as a White male most interested in White females. The majority (95%) of my interactions have been with White females. I do find Hispanic/Latina women attractive though.
Being 5'10" and a White man pursuing White women isn't ideal. White women are the ones most likely to demand 6'0"+ men.
Your height has been a large part of why you have achieved what you have achieved. I'm sure your face and overall fitness level has likely helped as well.
I disagree with you that women don't want a tall, rich top tier guy with a good frame. Women want that. The problem is that most women cannot get that type of man to commit to her longer term. A top tier woman in looks (typically 8-8.5+) has a chance to get this sort of commitment from a man, especially if she locks him down earlier in life. This will typically happen for women somewhere in the 18-29 age range when they are in that 8-8.5+ looks range.
The issue is that most women are not good looking enough to get the top tier man. What do they do?
There are some that end up riding the penis carousel for a long time, choosing to have sex with alpha males. At best, they get shorter term commitments from time, typically lasting one year or less. Often times, they end up in casual sex situationship type arrangements with these top tier men.
A lot of the more average looking to slightly above average looking women find commitments with someone near their level. These are women finding relationships with middle of the bell curve men in looks and maybe even semi-successful men financially. These men aren't elite looking men to be in the top tier on looks/money and they haven't adopted the personality tactics of the Manosphere/red pill (think Rollo Tomassi/Iron Rules of Tomassi or lessons from Rich Cooper's videos or Unplugged Alpha book). These are typical males, commonly called beta males or Average Frustrated Chumps (common term from the late 1990s-2000s era pickup community).
At the bottom of this post, I've linked an article and a video. I have linked an article from 2012 from Caleb Jones (aka Alpha Male 2.0 or Blackdragon in the past). In 2022, he turned about 90% of the content of that article into a YouTube video.
Jones identifies 3 types of women: Dominants, Submissives, and Independents. Dominant women tend to have strong personalities and try their best to dominate the frame of relationships. One type of dominant woman is the Girl Boss degreed and career-oriented woman. Submissive strongly respond to and prefer a male leader in their relationships. Independents tend to be outcome independent women who do not desire to dominate the frame of relationships and boss men around in a relationship. He has theorized that 60% of Western women are Dominants, 30% are Submissives, and 10% are Independents.
If you think his categorization of the quantity of women is accurate, then you start to see the common interactions. It's been said many times that 80-85% of men are betas/omegas and 15-20% of men are alpha/sigmas.
There are a lot of pairings with a Dominant type woman and beta male. That's the most common pairing and what
@FlexpertHamilton calls "the average guys they can control under the guise of a 50-50 relationship or in some cases a completely spineless guy they psychologically dominate". The majority of married men now are beta males who don't know or follow Iron Rule of Tomassi #1 (Frame is Everything and control it). A beta male with a Dominant woman will produce a relationship where the woman controls the frame of the relationship. Given that this is the most common pairing in a Western nation, this is why there are a lot of mediocre to subpar marriages with Dominant women dictating the terms of the interaction. Much of this depends on the degree to which a woman is Dominant and the degree to which a man is beta. Dominant and beta behaviors are exhibited on a continuum.
The women who tend to end up with alphas and sigmas in longer term relationships would be Submissives and Independents. While all relationships do erode in quality over time (I've long believed in a common shelf life of goodness of about 5 years), sometimes what remains after the quality erosion is good enough to warrant continuing on and it has a reasonable degree of quality. When this happens (less common), the more common type of pairing would be an Alpha/Sigma male and some Submissive/Independent woman.
-By Caleb Jones In our last post we talked about the three types of men. Now let’s talk about women. Women are quite different than men, obviously. Sometimes the term “Alpha woman” is thrown around, but it’s not quite accurate. Instead, a woman is either a...
alphamale20.com